You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #5: enforce is the wrong term, should have said "apply" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. enforce is the wrong term, should have said "apply"
of course the ruling must be constitutional, that is to follow the intentions of the lawmaker (which one can hope has checked before that the law to be voted was constitutional).

but there problem is still there. If it is the judge(s) personal political taste that in the end defines how the law should be interpreted (specially when you refer to "translation" of old texts written in a different context) giving a thumbs up or down for the sentence, you'll get an "ad hoc justice" depending on the current dominating opinion. Which is extremely dangerous in the end.

"the court is in effect giving a thumbs up or a thumbs down to the law"

what's that ? a "judiciocracy" ? Congress (or whatever body) shall make law, not courts. Courts are only an instrument.

obviously the concepts between the EU and the US vastly differ

in many European countries (inclusive France) judges are appointed by their peers to ensure the lack of political influence from politicians.

the equivalent of "Supreme Courts", don't deal with constitutional matters, there is no need because all laws are already constitutional or else they couldn't be voted.

a constitutional council (composed of lawyers and laymen) appointed for ten years (case France) checks the constitutionality before the law is passed. Then judges can apply the law and "interpretation" is seldom required. If there is such (jurisprudence) a new law more adapted to the new cases will be required.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC