You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #33: Now that's not true. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Now that's not true.
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 08:35 PM by caseymoz
A lot of things might have kept them from putting the cases together. To say that they're just too lazy to go after the real rapist-- there are a lot of things you could say that police are probably guilty of, but that charge is unbelievable. Where's their trial to prove they're doing that?

What question should be asked is why his DNA wasn't on file? After the fact, when they have the corpse, they could check against his DNA all they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC