|
fuming over rhetoric, few look at actions & results. let's list some.
obama: - mass bail out of wall street & bank corps. but middle & low income workers & home-owners - not so much. - sends out mass-murdering scum* kissinger, on diplomatic missions. - appoints corporate hack & kissinger associate, geithner, to one of the most important cabinet posts. - keeps bush flacks on in important cabinet posts; viz.: secdef gates. - spends more effort trying to cajole repukes into his bipartisan coalition, than listening & providing a say, to true progressives like kucinich. - allows a free hand to the cia & pentagon, in continuing the status quo. cases in point: as many posters pointed out - school of the americas; drone attacks in pakistan; continuing presence of troops in iraq. - vote in support of govt. eavesdropping. - but, he's a smart, intelligent, ivy-league post-grad, and - i agree - a nice, decent guy, who is sympathetic to those not at the top of the money pyramid, and did & does try to help and look out for them.
chavez: - nationalization of resources to benefit poor & indigenous venezuelans. - free elections, vetted by the european union, jimmy carter, et al. - oil assistance to poor countries, and the poor in rich countries. - trying & succeeding in increasing literacy in venezuela. - trying & succeeding in decreasing the poverty rate in venezuela. - tried to bring farc to the negotiation table; negotiated on hostages. - allowed the fascists who tried to shut his govt. down in the coup attempt to continue their miserable existence, ad our nauseam. - helped to propagate a renewed nationalism in the south american continent, to benefit the people of the land; instead of a bunch of rich oligarchs, and the multi-national corps. they ride on. - but, he's a blunt, plain-spoken, rough-talking, drop-out from grad school, who doesn't have the smooth facade of your average statesman; and will insult other world leaders at the drop of a hat, when they indulge in b-s.
yet, who's the more progressive here?
|