You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #232: They were never "banned" (popular misconception), they just couldn't have [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #230
232. They were never "banned" (popular misconception), they just couldn't have
adjustable stocks, threaded muzzles, or bayonet lugs if manufactured between 1994 and 2004, unless the protruding handgrip was eliminated (post-1994 rifles were limited to one "evil feature" only).

As to uses, they dominate competitive and recreational centerfire target shooting in the United States. They are functionally ordinary civilian rifles (non automatic, 1 shot per trigger pull) but generally use smaller calibers than traditional hunting style rifles and so are more pleasant to shoot due to less recoil.

Some target-shooting pics in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3757507&mesg_id=3758687

I personally shoot competitively with a SAR-1 (non-automatic civilian AK derivative), in IPSC/USPSA style competition.

They also make excellent home-defense firearms (if you choose to own a gun for that purpose), as the smaller calibers make them less likely to penetrate exterior walls than full-power rifles would be. The .223 Remington/5.56mm rifles are particularly good for that purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC