As a historical researcher, I've always felt that McAdams has dealt with the evidence openly and fairly. He doesn't try to answer questions he can't answer and when those situations occur he often gives fair time to differing opinions.
So I'd really like to know who wouldn't take me seriously if I cited his work, and please don't tell me I wouldn't be taken seriously by the Kennedy Assassination Book-of-the-Month Club, because those folks have money to make off of their theories. I'm pretty sure McAdams has tenure.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
