Reply #27: No. I thought of that pretty quickly too. The difference is that

[Joe Chi Minh]

you don't seem to realise that by accepting any of Bill Clinton's private life as a fit matter for bent Neocons to ridicule, plays straight into their hands.

And the whole business doesn't double me up with laughter anyway, because blokes in suits and high-power jobs are more likely, not less likely, to be more morally weak than than the general population, whether in terms of sexual morality in their private life, or much more commonly, in terms of their personal enrichment and lust for worldly power and status, at the expense of the people they are supposed to be serving.

Fortunately for the USA and the rest of the world, Bill's weakness was for the former, while his public service was and still remains in the hearts and minds of most Americans, and certainly the rest of the world, monumental. You have your Mt Rushmore to remind you of your great leaders, but the rest of the world still has the memory of Bill Clinton's administration fresh in its mind.