Government takes undeveloped property that owner is sitting on (former site of demolished parking garage) and turns it over to private developer who agrees to use it for a mixed use development: combination of commercial property and residential, with a set percentage dedicated for low income property. Original property owner sues government, claiming its an infringement of its property rights. My bet: a lot of folks on this list would be rooting for the government to win that case. The principle upheld in today's ruling is the same.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
