The
Right's Mendacious March to War
July
17, 2003
By punpirate
Maybe
it's time to stare the Bushies in their collective face, and
speak the truth - they're bald-faced liars about the reasons
for war.
While we endure endless Sunday pundits repeating the administration
line that the President considers the matter closed, and George
Tenet has, as more than one headline has put it, fallen on
his sword for the administration, the truth in the reasons
for war is still to be determined, and the truth likely will
not be found in the Executive Branch, given its general aversion
to speaking the truth.
What no one in the administration wants to admit (or will
admit) is that the war was a con job. As recently as Sunday,
July 13th, Condoleezza Rice was heard to say, when questioned
about the validity of Bush's Niger/Iraq uranium claim in his
State of the Union speech, "The statement that he made was
indeed accurate. The British government did say that."
Well, take me to logic prison and put me in Nietzsche's
cell. The intent of Bush saying that was to convince
Congress and the American people of the rectitude of a pre-emptive
war.
Much of the recent debate is centered around the particulars
of one document, which has since been clearly determined to
be a forgery. However, the point is not just this one issue
of whether or not intelligence or the President was deceived
by it. There is a mass of evidence, now apparently forgotten,
which bears on the matter. The principal nuclear operation
in Iraq at Tuwaitha had been under IAEA seal long before the
appearance of the forged document. Both UN inspection teams
had revealed no new nuclear processing facilities. The much-heralded
high-strength aluminum tubes which "could" be used for gas
centrifuge enrichment were quickly determined to be unusable
for that purpose. Later, even the strength of the alloy specified
was questioned as suitable for centrifuge use. Lost further
in the argument is that the tubes were never delivered.
The thousands of tons of chemical weapons, anthrax and other
biological agents said to have been harbored by the Iraqis,
capable of being deployed in "45 minutes" (thus suggesting
that Hussein's military was an "imminent threat to the U.S.")
have yet to be found, let alone capable of being deployed
quickly against U.S. citizens.
The drones capable of showering U.S. territory with deadly
chemical and biological weapons turned out to have been little
more than crudely-built model airplanes with ranges not in
the thousands of miles, or even hundreds of miles, but, rather
more like five miles (at least that's about as far as they
got in testing).
The alleged liaison between al-Qaeda and Hussein was found
to be non-existent. The threat posed by Ansar al-Islam turned
out to be a fiction.
The repeated stories of so-called "evidence" have come and
gone. Three-hundred pound bags of castor beans found in a
factory were "evidence" of a massive bioweapons program. That
they were found in a factory which made brake fluid (castor
beans being what brake fluid used to be made of - does anyone
know how the brand name "Castrol" was derived?) seemed not
to be of interest.
Indeed, the manifold assertions from the British and U.S.
governments that they'd found the mobile weapons labs which
their intelligence (rumors from INC exiles) proved existed
no longer have much clout - even though the intelligence agencies
of those two countries still insist they've got the incontrovertible
proof, bioweapons specialists are saying quite the opposite,
that the trucks were precisely for the purpose described by
the Iraqis, for the generation of hydrogen gas for artillery
balloons. That the British themselves sold the trucks to the
Iraqis seems to have been downplayed a good deal since the
original find.
The simple truth is this: virtually all of the assertions
made by both Tony Blair and George Bush about Iraq being an
imminent threat to the "world" are just so much nonsense.
They were nonsense right from the start. They were intended
to be nonsense, right from the start. The U.S. public was
led to supporting the war by an administration which used
the ignorance of a compliant press about such matters, and
by stoking the fears of the public over the possibility of
another attack on the U.S. similar to that of 9/11.
Bush and administration officials are quick to say they
never asserted there was evidence of Iraq being responsible
for the attack. But, they never missed an opportunity to put
Iraq, Hussein and 9/11 together in the same paragraph. Such
is the power of suggestion, and of propaganda, that nearly
two-thirds of Americans polled believed not only that Hussein
had orchestrated the attacks, but that Iraqis were among the
hijackers, as well. In other words, two-thirds of Americans
believed fiction and innuendo to be true. Two-thirds of Americans
had been suckered by the Bush administration with the help
of the mass media.
Does no one remember that the overthrow of Iraq was a plank
in the Republican platform for the 2000 election? Does no
one recall that a declaration written by the Project for the
New American Century think-tank which included the domination
of the Middle East, by force, if required, was signed in September,
2000, by several people who are now influential members of
the Bush administration, along with the current President's
brother, Jeb? Does anyone recall that changes in the national
security strategy to include pre-emptive war came well before
the pre-emptive war on Iraq? Does anyone recall that on the
day of 9/11/01, both Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, even
though the sensible and expected thing to do would be to find
the truth, were exhorting their assistants to find connections
between Iraq and the attacks?
Apparently not.
Years from now, perhaps when the people regain their senses,
and vote in a government with saner and cooler heads prevailing,
we will discover the truth about these times. That truth will
likely be that Bush and his administration used 9/11 to accomplish
a long-standing goal of the right - to topple Iraq, for personal,
political and economic reasons. Years from now, the government
will speak of what should have been obvious to the populace
had it not been whipped into a patriotic, unthinking frenzy
by the cheerleader in the Oval Office through an uninquisitive
press - that the war itself was a con job, that the plans
for Iraq after the war had nothing to do with liberty and
democracy, that the open-ended war contracts given to friends
of the administration were graft, and that privatization of
an entire country was the ultimate aim, including its lucrative
oil fields.
That economic domination of the world through trade treaties
wasn't quick enough, or profitable enough, for America's multinational
corporations, so military force would be used to change governments
and regions of the world to its liking. That the United States
of America finally, openly, became the bully-in-arms that
the countries of the world had known it to be in trade. That,
through Iraq, the right wing in the U.S. had finally expressed
its desires to dominate not just its own country, but the
world, as well, and had been planning the march to war for
a very long time.
punpirate is a New Mexico writer, remembering Phil Ochs'
advice.
|