Democratic Underground  

Rot on the Vine
January 28, 2003
By Ted Westervelt

In the early 1990s, Newt Gingrich and Bob Dole both smugly agreed that despite the fierce convictions they shared with generations of their party forefathers, a frontal assault on Social Security should be finally abandoned. They both concurred that a better tactic would be to merely watch it "rot on the vine." In essence, they both believed that in an increasingly federal resource starved environment, programs like Social Security simply wouldn't stand a chance of being funded.

Just in case anyone thought that that partisan paradigm ended with the millennium, in rides George W. Bush and the Republican controlled Congress. Before the sucking siphon on federal resources that they applied to the budget via their ten year, trillion dollar tax cut of 2001 has been fully installed, they are preparing to add a further six hundred billion dollar drain on it in the guise of another "stimulus." During a war. On the eve of another war.

Through this approach, George W. Bush and the GOP have taken "rot on the vine" one step further. With the flood of baby boomers rushing headlong toward a battered Social Security, they are actively weakening the foundations, removing buttresses, and avoiding regular maintenance by driving up the federal debt and floating various privatization schemes. When the boomers hit, hopes are high Social Security and other "wasteful" government programs will be washed away cleaner than if they were scoured by thousand years of right wing rhetoric.

As the mounting federal deficits show, the first siphon is working great. Good soldiers that the GOP Members are, with grisly examples of those slaughtered in decades of more traditional frontal assaults on Social Security and Medicare haunting them, they are holding to their stealthy flanking maneuver. Federal resources are continuing to be scattered to the four winds partly in hopes that the day of reckoning can be brought even closer.

The GOP is busily constructing the battlefield for that final act. They are digging a massive trench of debt in which to cover their actions. With ever higher percentages of our taxes going to service the debt racked up in the Bush giveaways, and the baby boomers poised to hit the system like a geriatric tidal wave, they hope that their suction grip on tax cuts and compassionate rhetoric will be enough to see them through, and will somehow enable them to avoid the responsibility for starving the federal government of the resources it needs to provide bare bones support to the less fortunate among us.

Of course, at that point Bush and his cohorts will be gone, spiritually secure in the notion that they were able to hold true to their wayward philosophies without ever having to address them above boards. Their gamble that in a final battle on Social Security and Medicare, the weakened, emaciated and indebted hulk of the federal government they left in their wake will require such a massive infusion of capital that only hefty tax hikes can save either. On that battlefield, they are comfortable taking their chances. And at that point, they will be beyond accountability.

The genius of this plan is that is makes wonderful use of the one area over which this President has displayed solid command. George W. Bush and many of his shadier corporate friends and supporters have a solid track record on bankrupting stuff. And their stands against government programs of any kind that do not involve direct payouts to them and their companies via tax cuts are in virtual lockstep.

Nobody knows how large a pool of red ink will it take to drown all the programs they abhor. But just two years ago, nobody thought that Enron could slip so quickly into a shady bankruptcy after becoming the largest supporter of a certain victorious presidential candidate.

One thing is for sure. Time is running out. They need to take full advantage of the post 9/11 world, in which they can retreat to the warm and cozy safety of the flag should anyone question their motives.

But they have stretched that flag so very thin.

Printer-friendly version
Tell a friend about this article Tell a friend about this article
Discuss this article
Democratic Underground Homepage