The
Contra Government
May 7, 2002
By Bridget Gibson
The twentieth century has been characterized by three
developments of great political importance: the growth of
democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of
corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power
against democracy.
—Alex Carey
How does one describe a government that is intent upon the
destruction of "government?" The word contrarian comes to
mind because it is for all intents and purposes, an anti-government
movement within the government. There are those among the
citizenry that wish to see the end of the government for a
variety of reasons. Some associated with David Koresh and
the Branch Davidians were "dooms day-ers" or "cultists" and
wished a departure from our society - it appears they got
their wish. Some militias have attempted secession from the
United States (Bo Gritz of Idaho, the Texas Constitutional
Militia and the Freemen in Montana come to mind). We can see
from the actions of George W. Bush and his administration
that he, too, wishes to end our government as we have known
it.
Bush has taken our Securities and Exchange Commission and
given it to the very folks that it is to monitor. He has taken
the Environmental Protection Agency and given it to the polluters.
He has taken the State Department and given it to a radical
fringe. He has taken the Justice Department and given it to
a fundamentalist zealot. He has taken the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission and given it to the power companies. He has taken
the Department of the Interior and given it to the companies
that will profit from the removal of public resources.
We have the former Alcoa CEO, Paul O'Neil, as the Treasury
Secretary who advocates that corporate taxes should be completely
abolished and that "able-bodied adults who have the ability
to earn income have an obligation not to pass part of their
own responsibility on to a broader population." Bush appointed
a commission to find the best way to dismantle our Social
Security trust fund entirely. We have Michael Powell, son
of Colin Powell, as the man in charge of the Federal Communications
Commission (this is the segment of government that monitors
the use of our publicly owned airwaves). Michael believes
that he can only look at mergers one at a time and not look
at the change in the landscape of the past in determining
the landscape of the future.
Looking at the appointment of John Negroponte as Ambassador
to the United Nations, one can only shudder. Mr. Negroponte
helped conceal from Congress the murder, kidnaping and torture
abuses of a CIA equipped and trained Honduran military unit,
Battalion 3-16. Bush's recess appointee Assistant Secretary
of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Otto Reich (also
of Iran-Contra fame), was involved in the CIA-assisted attempt
to overthrow Venezuela's democratically elected President,
Hugo Chavez.
Many of George W. Bush's appointees have a common bond. They
hold membership in two groups: one known as the "Federalist
Society" and the other as the "Council for National Policy."
These innocuous sounding names have been a part of a winning
strategy for the radical fringe of the conservative movement.
It is only in looking behind the facade of bland and vanilla
pronouncements that one can see that the intertwined objectives
of these two groups are to radically alter all three branches
of our government. By securing the placement of members of
these organizations to judicial appointments or upon advisory
boards and councils, the landscape of our country begins to
shift before us. Small steps have assumed the proportions
of major victories. We now have a United States Supreme Court
that has shown a disregard for the interpretation of our Constitution
and Bill of Rights (April 2001 decision regarding warrantless
arrest for misdemeanor charges - in this one case of failure
to wear a seatbelt). This SCOTUS decision easily places the
security of all citizens in doubt and can lead to a police
state.
The financial backing from these groups helps to assure that
advertising is skewed toward the victories (through election)
of like-minded individuals. The word "conservative" has been
taken as a mantle to cover the deeds and intentions of these
radical organizations. It was not so very long ago that I,
too, thought that I was "conservative" in my thinking. I now
realize that the "party of Lincoln" is no longer about justice
for all, but about the destruction of our democracy.
There is a place in our society for conserving and progressing.
We, the people, have been taken for a ride. The United States,
has gone from being the world's greatest producer to being
the world's largest debtor. As our deficits skyrocket and
our production declines, our debts mount. It is only a matter
of time before we are no longer able to repay the monies that
we owe. Much of our debt is held publicly, but other portions
are held by foreign interests. We should question all things
that are being done in our names and with us as cosigners
on loans that have no chance for repayment. For sixteen of
the past seventeen months, the lay off of non-farm workers
in the United States has exceeded 100,000 people per month.
Our unemployment rate is higher than anytime in the past eight
years. The creation of new jobs has in no way matched the
losses of the "old" jobs, and there appears to be no immediate
recovery in sight.
The radical policy makers of the current administration have
proven they cannot be trusted. What they are showing is their
agenda for America's future. This agenda includes the corruption
of the judicial system; the abuse of Christian principles
to impose a theocracy (through the "faith-based" initiative);
the destruction of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (through
the USA Patriot Act); the destruction of democratic organizations
(such as unions - as in the prevention of the UAL strike,
which thwarted legitimate employee grievances); the dismantling
of the public education system (through under-funding in excess
of $10.5 Billion); the transfer of public and private assets
(through eminent domain - recently in Mississippi the Courts
ruled that independent landowners could not refuse to sell
their land to Japanese-owned Nissan). We also have the continued
usurpation of our public airwaves through media mergers. All
major media is now controlled by fewer than ten (10) corporations.
Their agenda is to shift our country from being one of individual
liberty (as enumerated in the Bill of Rights) to one controlled
by the ruling class of a self-selected few.
|