Democratic Primaries

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)

38. In the 'gas guy' article it says 'sabbatical'

Reply to R B Garr (Reply #35)

Tue Apr 16, 2019, 06:41 PM

Apr 2019

which surely would be paid in increments, not lump sum, no?

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Where did Jane Sanders report her $200K in severance pay in 2011? Could someone who knows [View all] pnwmom Apr 2019 OP

Right wing talking point. nt hay rick Apr 2019 #1

So just because a question is uncomfortable, it has now become a "right wing talking point"? SFnomad Apr 2019 #4

First sentences of the vtdigger article... hay rick Apr 2019 #12

I didn't post that ad or anything Vallee said. The VT Digger is a legit, non-rightwing source. n/t pnwmom Apr 2019 #13

Would you look at that melman Apr 2019 #14

But that's not the article itself, is it? Hortensis Apr 2019 #15

"his own behavior has revealed he's the wrong stuff for any position of power in a democracy" -AMEN... NurseJackie Apr 2019 #26

That's hardly the definition of a "right wing talking point" SFnomad Apr 2019 #18

So only right-wingers care about candidates' taxes? That's news to me. nt pnwmom Apr 2019 #6

You should consider that this is not the same thing as getting a check for $200K mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #2

Thank you. I knew someone would know more about this than I do. pnwmom Apr 2019 #3

That would NORMALLY be how it works for an average person, but it doesn't have to always be :) mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #8

You answered my question well -- could there be a legit reason. Thank you! n/t pnwmom Apr 2019 #9

It was paid out for two years Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #5

Thank you for this. Could you add the link please? n/t pnwmom Apr 2019 #7

Which is logical, it's often to both parties advantage to spread large payments out ... mr_lebowski Apr 2019 #10

What does this have to do with why it's not on their tax return? R B Garr Apr 2019 #20

It's in the top income line (7) wages, salaries and tips. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #25

That looks about $100,000 short, at least. R B Garr Apr 2019 #27

Their Line 7 W2 income with her working in 2009, 2010 and 2011 is between 282 - 295k Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #31

Are there W2's to view?? You said in another post that they R B Garr Apr 2019 #33

Lol. Severance pay isn't a Golden Parachute. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2019 #34

LOL, they all call golden parachutes severance pay. R B Garr Apr 2019 #35

In the 'gas guy' article it says 'sabbatical' floppyboo Apr 2019 #38

Jane called it that. nt R B Garr Apr 2019 #40

I'm an accountant this would normally be on a W2 ALBliberal Apr 2019 #11

You're correct, severance pay (sabbatical pay?) is considered normal income and should be reported.. George II Apr 2019 #16

Interesting! why wasn't this reported. R B Garr Apr 2019 #21

As I've pointed out, many (if not all) of these tax returns are incomplete.... George II Apr 2019 #22

Thanks for the research into this. Basically, these aren't really his taxes. R B Garr Apr 2019 #24

That's why he too so long Docreed2003 Apr 2019 #32

case closed! You guys are so funny. Who needs cable! floppyboo Apr 2019 #39

Jane Sanders isn't running DeeDeeNY Apr 2019 #17

But she will be vetted. Demsrule86 Apr 2019 #19

I think the tax returns are not authentic nt BlueFlorida Apr 2019 #23

Any Sign Of Old Town Media? Me. Apr 2019 #28

I was wondering the same thing! R B Garr Apr 2019 #29

.. Me. Apr 2019 #30

That could have been paid out as structured payments. MineralMan Apr 2019 #36

Fair question that should be examined. Aaron Pereira Apr 2019 #37