Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Democratic Primaries

(11,982 posts)

18. Seriously, did you or anyone else who follows Dem politics really think it could have been...

Mon Nov 11, 2019, 01:35 PM

Nov 2019

...Warren, Harris, Klobuchar, or Williamson?

One doesn't have to identify a person by name to know exactly who is being referenced.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gabbard lawyers demand retraction of Clinton's 'defamation' [View all] RandySF Nov 2019 OP

Clinton did not mention her. She outed herself. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #1

Yes, this is a case of "If the shoe fits..." (nt) ehrnst Nov 2019 #2

Exactly... One can not defame someone never identified. hlthe2b Nov 2019 #4

That's the problem right there and not Hillary's comments Hav Nov 2019 #22

And THAT ubiquitous recognition crazytown Nov 2019 #25

Lawsuit judgements are rarely predicated on biased inferences. LanternWaste Nov 2019 #29

what a joke. barbtries Nov 2019 #3

Gabbard was never mentioned. I guess the truth hurts. onecaliberal Nov 2019 #5

A Very Trumpian Move Me. Nov 2019 #6

Yawn.... Pachamama Nov 2019 #7

Who? MrsCoffee Nov 2019 #8

LOL, Tulsi's really BlueMTexpat Nov 2019 #9

Are they the same lawyers that both Trump and those Russians are using? TheBlackAdder Nov 2019 #20

Looking for more attention Gabbard? still_one Nov 2019 #10

Clinton still has sources of information that we don't. Firestorm49 Nov 2019 #11

It's not defamation if it is true; opinions are also not defamation OKNancy Nov 2019 #12

HRC statement named no names, therefore, Tulsi Gabbard Iliyah Nov 2019 #13

For God's sake hasn't Gabbard milked this enough? brush Nov 2019 #14

Aw. NurseJackie Nov 2019 #15

I wish I understood how any of this was supposed to be helpful. redqueen Nov 2019 #16

She's mad and desperate Hav Nov 2019 #17

The DNC boomer_wv Nov 2019 #19

Frivolous lawsuit Xandric77 Nov 2019 #21

Seems that since her name wasn't mentioned Bettie Nov 2019 #23

After she quits her campaign to run for prez... scardycat Nov 2019 #24

No. Fox News will want a rebel 'Democrat' crazytown Nov 2019 #26

She already joined the Fox News network Xandric77 Nov 2019 #27