Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

PatrickforO

(14,570 posts)
28. Interesting logic, and compelling.
Thu Oct 17, 2019, 01:11 AM
Oct 2019

I saw another post on here that used the analogy of us getting nickel and dimed by the airlines after they were deregulated to show that the public would not buy the argument that overall cost would go down.

But, you know, that post made me think maybe we ought to re-regulate the airlines.

Your post, I agree with. Medicare for all would be the right thing to do, but it will take major political courage on the part of the whole Democratic party to roll over the billion dollar healthcare provider and big pharma lobbies.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Yup. HerbChestnut Oct 2019 #1
Totally. BeckyDem Oct 2019 #2
M4A $34 trillion over 10 years. Yes your taxes will go up. wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #3
But so will the amount of care avalible for you. SterlingPound Oct 2019 #4
That fact is lost on some. BeckyDem Oct 2019 #7
YUP SterlingPound Oct 2019 #8
The fact that is lost is voters, therefore congress is never going to pass a 32 trillion $ bill! Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #24
You mean quality? Not necessarily for those with good plans ---some are affordable or paid for by emmaverybo Oct 2019 #22
That's fine. It will likely be cheaper than paying for private insurance. HerbChestnut Oct 2019 #13
Indeed. And I'm willing to pay a lot more taxes in order to get rid of the giant PatrickforO Oct 2019 #34
The DU rules specify a 4 paragraph limit, to avoid violating copyright limit. pnwmom Oct 2019 #5
+1 crazytown Oct 2019 #9
"The Nation" is a RW source nt NYMinute Oct 2019 #10
lol BeckyDem Oct 2019 #11
that is simply a false assertion, regardless of whether you agree with the OP or not Celerity Oct 2019 #15
It certainly has some pretty far out there ideas. Stopped reading anything they print Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #25
That's flat out false...it endosed Sen. Sanders in '16 AncientGeezer Oct 2019 #27
No it's not. What kind of talk is that? PatrickforO Oct 2019 #29
+10000 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2019 #20
Ah, that explains it. The Nation attacked Hillary. PatrickforO Oct 2019 #30
And The Nation has promoted Edward Snowden. n/t pnwmom Oct 2019 #33
From 2017 BeckyDem Oct 2019 #6
Oh please! Of course repubs favor repeal.. and replace with nothing Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #26
I think you're missing the point here ... compare and contrast the OP with this 2017 article mr_lebowski Oct 2019 #35
Please self-delete .. The Nation is a RW source nt BlueMississippi Oct 2019 #12
No, it is no such thing. The authors are also not right wing, not in any shape or form. BeckyDem Oct 2019 #14
DU was sued for copyright infringement and one reason it won the suit pnwmom Oct 2019 #19
You've got to be kidding. crazytown Oct 2019 #16
+10000 Celerity Oct 2019 #18
Thank you. BeckyDem Oct 2019 #21
yw Celerity Oct 2019 #23
lol, the same bollocks as the other poster making the exact same erroneous claim Celerity Oct 2019 #17
Who told you that? blm Oct 2019 #31
Horse pucky as we geezers say. AncientGeezer Oct 2019 #32
Wrong kcr Oct 2019 #37
Interesting logic, and compelling. PatrickforO Oct 2019 #28
Essential reading for all, but especially those who oppose M4A Fiendish Thingy Oct 2019 #36
Or will die PDittie Oct 2019 #38
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»The 'Public Option' on He...»Reply #28