Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Showing Original Post only (View all)Beto O'Rourke is not the progressive some imagine [View all]
by Elizabeth Bruenig
In the meantime, though, we have the national election to think about, and when it comes to national politics, ORourke is plainly uninspiring.
As Zaid Jilani pointed out at Current Affairs, ORourkes congressional voting record signals skepticism about progressive priorities. While the Democratic base is coalescing around single-payer health care and free college, ORourke sponsored neither House bill, Jilani wrote, During his time in Congress, he never joined the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Instead, ORourke is a member of the New Democrat Coalition, a centrist caucus with Clintonian views on health care, education and trade.
Where it comes to Medicare-for-all, ORourke has been carefully unclear about his stance: A Politico article from July notes that, at least for a time, he had sworn off using the terms single payer or Medicare-for-all, instead using the less-specific, policy-neutral phrase universal, guaranteed, high-quality health care for all.
His campaign website remains unclear, stating that he aims for achieving universal health care coverage whether it be through a single payer system, a dual system, or otherwise.
ORourkes other progressive-ish policy positions tend to follow along these lines. While some progressives, rallied by talk of a Green New Deal, have argued for higher taxes on oil and gas company profits, fossil fuel lobbyists to be banned from working in the White House and a whole-economy overhaul slotting Americans into jobs producing carbon-neutral infrastructure, ORourkes statements on energy have been surprisingly thin. He has called the decision between oil and gas and renewable energy sources a false choice and proposes on his campaign website mainly to rejoin the Paris climate accord, empower the Environmental Protection Agency and enact energy reform.
As Zaid Jilani pointed out at Current Affairs, ORourkes congressional voting record signals skepticism about progressive priorities. While the Democratic base is coalescing around single-payer health care and free college, ORourke sponsored neither House bill, Jilani wrote, During his time in Congress, he never joined the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Instead, ORourke is a member of the New Democrat Coalition, a centrist caucus with Clintonian views on health care, education and trade.
Where it comes to Medicare-for-all, ORourke has been carefully unclear about his stance: A Politico article from July notes that, at least for a time, he had sworn off using the terms single payer or Medicare-for-all, instead using the less-specific, policy-neutral phrase universal, guaranteed, high-quality health care for all.
His campaign website remains unclear, stating that he aims for achieving universal health care coverage whether it be through a single payer system, a dual system, or otherwise.
ORourkes other progressive-ish policy positions tend to follow along these lines. While some progressives, rallied by talk of a Green New Deal, have argued for higher taxes on oil and gas company profits, fossil fuel lobbyists to be banned from working in the White House and a whole-economy overhaul slotting Americans into jobs producing carbon-neutral infrastructure, ORourkes statements on energy have been surprisingly thin. He has called the decision between oil and gas and renewable energy sources a false choice and proposes on his campaign website mainly to rejoin the Paris climate accord, empower the Environmental Protection Agency and enact energy reform.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-perspec-beto-orourke-not-progressive-enough-1207-20181206-story.html
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
183 replies, 9255 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
183 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That's fine... Beto is entitled to his views. But, voters don't have to accept them.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2019
#180
Sounds like a Bernie-ite- Beto will definitely take a chunk of Bernie fans
redstateblues
Mar 2019
#3
I guess that sanders supporters are nervous and so it is time to attack Beto again
Gothmog
Mar 2019
#13
Joe's been vetted for decades and Beto was heavily vetted in his race vs. Cruz.
TwilightZone
Mar 2019
#44
Nope. Biden has been a national figure for decades, even from the time he was first elected....
George II
Mar 2019
#125
The hemming and hawing by Beto on these issues tells me everything I need to know.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Mar 2019
#182
Not as brutal as for those who have to answer questions about missing votes, missing tax returns,
lapucelle
Mar 2019
#139
I don't think so. A compelling argument can be made against Medicare for All.
Demsrule86
Mar 2019
#158
Wrong...people who have workplace insurance would pay more...there are no family plans on Medicare.
Demsrule86
Mar 2019
#171
I think our system needs to be fixed with a lowering of medicare age and a public option.
Demsrule86
Mar 2019
#174
He's a pretty moderate Democrat, but he's young and has, you know, "charisma."
MineralMan
Mar 2019
#5
So? He's a Democrat in Texas, an uphill climb trying to unseat an incumbent republican....
George II
Mar 2019
#85
The increased attacks on him and Biden over the last few days tell me the same thing.
George II
Mar 2019
#84
I wish we could choose three or four this early. I have it narrowed down to:
George II
Mar 2019
#161
Its not that I don't like some that I've tossed, I just don't think they'd be strong enough...
George II
Mar 2019
#163
I believe only Beto or Biden can win a general so I won't vote for any others in the primary. Ohio
Demsrule86
Mar 2019
#169
Given the Long Duration of the Campaign, There Will Be Sufficient Time to Vet all of the Candidates
dlk
Mar 2019
#40
Two white guys? Not sure how well that would be received this time.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Mar 2019
#121
Probably because anybody watching Beto launch his campaign realize that many of the Bernie support
Pachamama
Mar 2019
#135
One of the biggest knocks I've seen on him is that he's "young and charismatic", like that's bad!
George II
Mar 2019
#137
Happened with Harris a bit ago, and Biden in the last few days, this is the second time with Beto
emulatorloo
Mar 2019
#94
Anyone aiming at Dems rather than the fat, lying, treasonous racist, is not a Dem.
Hassler
Mar 2019
#95
I think so too. Good bye youth vote. All that will be left are some angry populist
CrossingTheRubicon
Mar 2019
#115
There was a huge turnout for him in November. The lines were long and full of younger people
dalton99a
Mar 2019
#124
I don't want medicare for all. I think trying to pass and implement a bill that takes away
Demsrule86
Mar 2019
#157
I love the fact that both fox news and the sanders supporters are terrified of Beto
Gothmog
Mar 2019
#164