Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Blue Meany

(1,947 posts)
7. Although I'm still puzzled by some of what happened, what is clear to me,
Mon May 23, 2016, 04:24 PM
May 2016

having read just about everything available, is that after the District Convention the party leaders were afraid of losing their power at the Convention, which is the highest party authority in the state. Although they claim that they made virtually no changes to the rules since 2008, there actually are some fairly significant ones:

For example, they removed this 2008 rule:

"State Democratic Party Officers are prohibited from endorsing or demonstrating official aid to or support of one Democratic candidate over another in the 2008 Nevada precinct caucuses. "

And they added this rule:

"All current members of the State Central Committee shall be given an opportunity to serve another term as a committee member."

In the 2008, a Quorum was 50% of the delegates but in 2016 it was 40%.

They also changed the rules about delegate registration to say that anyone who hadn't registered by 10:00 am would be considered to have vacated their seats, whereas, in past years their seat would be filled by an alternate until they showed up.

One of the Hillary delegates mentioned that they had all been urged to be there no later than 9:00 am, because there might be a vote on the rules. However, on the official agenda that vote is schedule for 10:00 am or later. Funny thing is, it was voted on just as soon as they had 40% of the delegates there for a quorum. It's almost as if it were planned that way.




Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»one more time What happen...»Reply #7