HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Politics & Government » Populist Reform of the Democratic Party (Group) » "Conspiracy theory&q... » Reply #45

Response to merrily (Reply #40)

Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:58 AM

45. No the labeling does not disprove it. But IMHO burden of proof is on the the one proposing it

I don't see anything controversial about that statement.

I have a few CT's that I've been invested in over the years - for example I beleive Bush's "Do Not Call List" was a way to troll for phone numbers.

As to caring about DU's credibility, it is one of my personal issues. So it is just a general statement I made. Been around so long I guess I am personally invested. So that's why I spoke of that.

I couldn't care less that you couldn't care less about DU's cred. That's your prerogative, and probably more healthy than me being personally invested in the site.

What concerns me is that you appear to conclude that I think you are a "bad person" and I am attacking you personally. When in fact I like you and admire/enjoy your posts.

I am afraid I read your reply to me as extremely aggressive and sensed a lot of anger in it. Hence the fighting reference. Am quite willing to concede I might have misinterepeted it.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 47 replies Author Time Post
merrily Sep 2015 OP
orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #1
merrily Sep 2015 #2
orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #13
merrily Oct 2015 #41
orpupilofnature57 Oct 2015 #46
TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #3
merrily Sep 2015 #5
TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #11
merrily Sep 2015 #12
TexasProgresive Sep 2015 #16
merrily Sep 2015 #17
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #25
merrily Oct 2015 #37
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #42
merrily Oct 2015 #43
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #44
Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #4
merrily Sep 2015 #7
Erich Bloodaxe BSN Sep 2015 #9
merrily Sep 2015 #10
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #27
robertpaulsen Oct 2015 #22
newfie11 Sep 2015 #6
merrily Sep 2015 #8
Jim Lane Sep 2015 #14
merrily Sep 2015 #15
Jim Lane Sep 2015 #19
orpupilofnature57 Sep 2015 #18
historylovr Oct 2015 #20
Ichingcarpenter Oct 2015 #21
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #24
zeemike May 2016 #47
rhett o rick Oct 2015 #23
still_one Oct 2015 #26
merrily Oct 2015 #31
still_one Oct 2015 #34
merrily Oct 2015 #35
PatrickforO Oct 2015 #28
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #29
merrily Oct 2015 #32
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #36
merrily Oct 2015 #38
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #39
merrily Oct 2015 #40
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply No the labeling does not disprove it. But IMHO burden of proof is on the the one proposing it
emulatorloo Oct 2015 #45
Doubledee Oct 2015 #30
merrily Oct 2015 #33
Please login to view edit histories.