Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
21. Never gonna happen, and never should.
Sat Mar 23, 2013, 08:56 PM
Mar 2013

$5 for every single shot is ridiculous.

Put a crazy tax on every thing that might be dangerous, yeah, that's a happy world.

Solve poverty, inequity, hopelessness, and the violence will go away. NYC_SKP Mar 2013 #1
+1 freshwest Mar 2013 #23
not sure it will go away, and in the meantime, guns are a very big part of violence and pollution CreekDog Mar 2013 #24
Agree. But most who covet guns would still covet them, carry them, buy the latest lethal technology Hoyt Mar 2013 #30
Just a thought. How about we fund national health care and medical research? geckosfeet Mar 2013 #2
Because it partly works, and the US is going to need all kinds of solutions to fix the problem. PDJane Mar 2013 #3
How about we tax food at 10%. That way everyone pays more. Granted the poor will feel the pinch geckosfeet Mar 2013 #12
The plan is to make those who can afford it pay, not to tax the essentials of life. PDJane Mar 2013 #18
Whose plan? I am not aware of any legislation moving in that direction. geckosfeet Mar 2013 #20
there is already a tax on bullets bossy22 Mar 2013 #4
SO let's ad 600% to that tax nonoyes Mar 2013 #6
Why don't we seize the assets of all family members of gun offenders? bossy22 Mar 2013 #9
^^^^ ellisonz Mar 2013 #37
It's 10% on firearms and 11% on ammunition, charged at the wholesale level slackmaster Mar 2013 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Mar 2013 #5
I'm sure your ducks love that tax! nonoyes Mar 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Mar 2013 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author billh58 May 2017 #54
Chris Rock has a solution BainsBane Mar 2013 #8
LOVE this clip, probably should have been part of my OP. nonoyes Mar 2013 #17
I have long proposed a $5 per round tax on handgun calibers .25 & up, and on the military-style apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #10
unintended consequence? bossy22 Mar 2013 #11
It would be thrown out Niceguy1 Mar 2013 #13
Are you a Constitutional scholar or just a gun nut? nt Progressive dog Mar 2013 #14
you don't have to be a constitutional scholar bossy22 Mar 2013 #15
Because the poster stated an opinion on Constitutional law Progressive dog Mar 2013 #32
Neither Niceguy1 Mar 2013 #16
That's absurd BainsBane Mar 2013 #19
Yes, true wyldwolf Mar 2013 #22
Rights. Straw Man Mar 2013 #27
That, in itself, opens up another set of questions and, quite honestly... wyldwolf Mar 2013 #28
Yes. Straw Man Mar 2013 #34
circular arguments from you wyldwolf Mar 2013 #36
the notion that constitutionality BainsBane Mar 2013 #40
Absurdity. Straw Man Mar 2013 #26
the taxes on those are small Niceguy1 Mar 2013 #29
It would limit your right to free speech guardian Mar 2013 #39
No, it wouldn't. Congress could raise it to a MILLION dollars a round, and the courts apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #41
Not so-the Supremes have already held that such a tax is unconstitutional friendly_iconoclast Mar 2013 #50
Never gonna happen, and never should. NYC_SKP Mar 2013 #21
it's a partial and temporary solution. The permanent solution is going to be a long slog. PDJane Mar 2013 #25
Have you ever heard of a"temporary tax" that truly was. oneshooter Mar 2013 #31
one or two. Mostly around one thing that had to be built, like water purification. PDJane Mar 2013 #38
What's a 7.62X19? CokeMachine Mar 2013 #33
"I didn't want to pollute the place with a link." ellisonz Mar 2013 #35
Yep, I meant 7.62 X 39, the so-called "Soviet round." Thanks for the correction. n/t. apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #42
I knew what you meant. CokeMachine Mar 2013 #43
What about all the ARs chambered for non-military rounds? GoldenEagle16 Mar 2013 #44
Would need a direct connection. Tax going to pay hospitals for handling gunshot wounds, or form an freshwest Mar 2013 #46
Would you insure the owner, or the gun? oneshooter Mar 2013 #47
The owner of the gun, just like the owner of a car. Inanimate objects can't sign contracts. Not yet. freshwest Mar 2013 #48
The reason I asked was because some folks were talking about a policy for each firearm. oneshooter Mar 2013 #49
Yep Duckhunter935 Mar 2013 #52
^^^^ ellisonz Mar 2013 #53
Bad precident manicdem May 2017 #55
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»We tax a gallon of gasoli...»Reply #21