Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
In reply to the discussion: When Men on the Left Refuse to See Their Sexism [View all]Buffalo Bull
(138 posts)72. The truth is...Free speech is THE liberal principle
We liberals are the defenders of the rights and equality of all of America's out casts. The slurs the oppressors tell about about gays and women and blacks...are lies designed to make acceptable this negative view. Only truth, some time gritty presented that stole the slurs from the oppressors. There was a time, the 'n' word was used only by the oppressors until it was taken and shown to be impotent by the media and entertainment industries. Now you may start a fight with that word, but its meaning has changed.
Censorship requires you to lie, subtly perhaps but a lie is, what a lie is. That is why oppressive societies regard restricting free speech as primary. That censorship creates a silence that allows the oppressive slur to be taken as fact.
If your speech does not reflect your meaning , it is a lie. And by a measure you have weakened your side.
You mentioned homophobic slurs against log cabin. Clarify your point, is it that you dislike a word being used in a form that is politically 'unfair'?
Any homophobic slur that I might utter would be at the expense of Antonin Scalia and in support of the log cabins seeking equality, thus would be very difficult to condemn as homophobic.
Wouldn't it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
no. i will not change the wording of an author to appease or comfort A FEW men.
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#4
maybe i should put the link above. i thought it was suppose to be at the bottom.
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#50
ya? and my first response was... right, tell me again why boys and men do EXACTLY the same
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#53
none of the words are mine. the whole thing from title to picture to all text is the author.
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#65
I believe she's talking about men as a class -- not every man on the planet. n/t
whathehell
Apr 2013
#57
Incorrect. The "When" limits it to only those who do so. If I say, "When people run marathons,
Dark n Stormy Knight
Apr 2013
#84
ya... cause i am pretty sure not ALL people are runnin' that marathon. thanks. nt
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#86
"there is a group of five or so members" wow. you sound like you have been here a LONG time.
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#15
you call us a bunch of misandrists, and refer to your partner as "the wife"--charming. doesn't
niyad
Apr 2013
#35
sister militant of the order of the sisters of perpetual outrage. lmao. needs to continue.
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#36
you guys are funny. k.... someone decide on for me and tell me how to do it. lol
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#43
yes, you may leave your clothes on. it's the sisters of perpetual indulgence who are often
niyad
Apr 2013
#44
can't take credit for it--a poster referred to some of us as militant feminists the other day--had
niyad
Apr 2013
#59
kinda ironic since it is an article addressing men attacking women thru sexism
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#13
Good....You're right...It's hardly a "safe haven" when they attack us for sport. n/t
whathehell
Apr 2013
#54
asking men who are suppose to be on the side of equality for women is devolving into the enemy?
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#22
the whole article needed to be posted for our fellow duers. but ya... that should be highlighted
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#20
SOME, you gotta change it to SOME, right fuckin' now.... please, oh please....
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#31
men... described only as professionally and acurately. woman... refered to as screaming.
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#62
when we start discussing the ease we use racism on du, then you may have a point. we seem to be
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#66
When white people try to use the in-group n-word they're shamed and ridiculed.
redqueen
Apr 2013
#75
As soon as someone throws out the "PC" whine, they are off my list of people
Sheldon Cooper
Apr 2013
#111
honestly, i listen to a whole slew of this shit and i think, really. people are demanding the worst
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#116
ya. racist, sexist, homophobic slurs have all evolved, no longer bothersome. this man meant nothin'
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#82
you aren't "supposed" to take it any particular way, you take it any way you like. if you or your
niyad
Apr 2013
#103
or a bully, sexist, misogynist. a racist. a homophobic. a white male with privilege not willing
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#117
not to mention having HH brought back in thought, and the men playing with it, all the while
seabeyond
Apr 2013
#128