Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: HEY DWS! Mark Ruffalo Promotes PETITION Calling On DNC To Hold MORE Debates [View all]zalinda
(5,621 posts)16. It's probably simplier than that
those that have enough in their life, like the status quo.
Those that do not have enough for a stable life, are in the Progressive wing.
Z
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
HEY DWS! Mark Ruffalo Promotes PETITION Calling On DNC To Hold MORE Debates [View all]
Segami
Dec 2015
OP
anyone who doesn't promote the possibility of more debates in this debacle shouldn't be
roguevalley
Dec 2015
#8
Since this went instantly to Mark's resume, let me say I hope all activist minded persons
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2015
#51
This issue epitomizes the split in the party and exposes which side the leadership of our
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#7
Wrong the whole Dem party supports the middle Class: They just are rejecting Sanders
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#11
There is no such thing as a whole Democratic Party. I know that the hubris of the Democraic Elite
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#12
And that is the typical response. "We can't fight for freedom because it's too hard so
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#54
Yikes. You actually come out and say that you support the Oligarchy. By the way, the Democratic
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#56
You don't sound like a Democrat. So at our foodbank, before we give out food we should
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#62
If the left was son concern with these things they should not have voted for Nader
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#59
How do you know where she gets her "marching" orders? I think you want it to be true.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#63
Yes, Dem tend favor other Dem's not socialist: Sanders has not worked for the party
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#64
Calling Sen Sanders a socialist is low. He is far from a socialist but the Republicons and
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#66
The poster I was discussing this with full knows the difference but like others is trying
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#74
No such things as elite Dem's: Just hard working Dem's that don't want Sanders
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#60
Hard working for the oligarchy. They hate all progressives. Helping the People, the 99% would cost
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#61
NO, the most important thing about the Dem's is their heart and the Hard work
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#65
Her resume includes some disasterous decisions. She takes money from the wealthy.
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#68
But her "hard choices" were wrong. She failed when the chips were down. She failed to stand up
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#71
She has been there for the American people for over 30 years when chips were down
lewebley3
Dec 2015
#75
The hubris of the DLC decided to run Gore in spite of the warnings that he would
rhett o rick
Dec 2015
#79
It's not about changing the race, it's about getting the Democrat's message to the public.
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2015
#32
I'm sorry, I don't think petitions work on people who have a preexisting agenda
AZ Progressive
Dec 2015
#19