Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
27. the av number of procedures goes down doesn't it?
Sat Nov 21, 2015, 05:03 PM
Nov 2015

In a public health system unnecessary procedures are not performed. Here in the USA doctors want to do more procedures to make money?

Another fail Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #1
most of the health care expenditure are on hill2016 Nov 2015 #2
All of those you list TM99 Nov 2015 #3
and guess how much hill2016 Nov 2015 #4
And Hillary is so much better Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #7
the drug companies fear Hillary hill2016 Nov 2015 #11
What is her plan? Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #14
here you go hill2016 Nov 2015 #18
Oooh.. identical to Bernie except for a few things I_AM_SAM Nov 2015 #25
Hillary has been fighting for healthcare hill2016 Nov 2015 #26
Then why did she support Heritage Foundation version of HillaryCare I_AM_SAM Nov 2015 #28
what's your point here? hill2016 Nov 2015 #45
Treat the people Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #6
you know hill2016 Nov 2015 #8
They can be prevented in the first place Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #12
that's not really the problem hill2016 Nov 2015 #16
I disagree somewhat Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #21
yeah hill2016 Nov 2015 #29
This is the GOPs position AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #55
I believe you don't know shit about diabetes and obesity. Your ignorant post just showed that Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #51
I am and many in my extended family are diabetic. If we eat a perfectly balanced diabetic diet Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #52
then as you know hill2016 Nov 2015 #53
We are all type 2. The point of putting her on a diet regime is the control blood glucose levels. Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #54
Unless we make other changes to the system, you'd be lucky to cut 10% out of monthly premiums by Hoyt Nov 2015 #5
The root of the problem imho is inequality. BootinUp Nov 2015 #9
You make a good point. Hoyt Nov 2015 #13
thank you hill2016 Nov 2015 #10
So what is her plan? Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #15
here you go hill2016 Nov 2015 #19
A good start for drug prices Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #23
We'd be so much better off if people had accepted Hillary Care in the early 1990s. I think she'll Hoyt Nov 2015 #17
amazing isn't it? hill2016 Nov 2015 #20
I admit to forgetting how her plan was structured back then BootinUp Nov 2015 #22
It was a bit complicated for folks, but it had authority/input at the local level to help with a Hoyt Nov 2015 #24
the fact that she was hill2016 Nov 2015 #32
K&R for this sub-thread, and the OP. Interesting discussion. nt MeNMyVolt Nov 2015 #30
the av number of procedures goes down doesn't it? Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #27
why would the number of procedures go down? hill2016 Nov 2015 #31
Hopefully it would reduce the number of unnecessary procedures Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #33
It very much depends on the type of system, and Medicare isn't very good at that either Recursion Nov 2015 #41
Why would it go down? We have 30 million uninsured and 50 million underinsured. Recursion Nov 2015 #40
I love reading Republican Underground....er, wait a minute. Sorry. Armstead Nov 2015 #34
real world facts hill2016 Nov 2015 #35
It's like stepping into the Twilight zone ... TheFarS1de Nov 2015 #43
So supporting Hilary now means attacking single-payer, aka medicare-for-all??? reformist2 Nov 2015 #36
um hill2016 Nov 2015 #37
No, but supporting math means recognizing that it won't save us money Recursion Nov 2015 #42
No need to "take a stab", CMS has the numbers. It's about 4% of that. Recursion Nov 2015 #38
yup hill2016 Nov 2015 #44
And half of that 4% isn't profit Recursion Nov 2015 #47
you also hill2016 Nov 2015 #49
which table are you using? hill2016 Nov 2015 #46
Above that one (in the CMS spreadsheet): Total Administration and Total Net Cost Recursion Nov 2015 #48
you're right hill2016 Nov 2015 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Nov 2015 #39
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The US spends $3 trillion...»Reply #27