Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
56. She didn't get it in '08
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 03:05 PM
Oct 2015

because the big money in the party decided Obama could win. They threw her the Secretary of State bone and told her to wait until '16.

Clinton down 10 points in one week [View all] left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 OP
Reuters online poll is held in low regard by Nate Silver Sliceo Oct 2015 #1
This was same as a phone poll. n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #2
No it wasn't Godhumor Oct 2015 #4
Yes it was. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #5
Because that is what the "poll" is Godhumor Oct 2015 #6
Again, where do you get that it is an online poll? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #8
Here wyldwolf Oct 2015 #9
There's an enormous difference between using online surveys and it being an 'online poll'. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #10
Have fun with it. Mitt Romney and his supporters did. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #11
What does that non-sequitur have to do with anything? n/t ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #12
Because Romney's crew believed these... intersectionality Oct 2015 #15
You're suggesting that Reuter's numbers are incorrect? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #18
Give it up. Godhumor is right. It is an online poll. No phones at all Sliceo Oct 2015 #59
No, he's not correct, and neither are you. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #62
That's the same thing I said Sliceo Oct 2015 #76
I'm just fine, and that not 'the same thing I said'. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #78
You wrote "This was a phone poll" oberliner Oct 2015 #81
No, it exposes a brain cramp. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #84
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #91
Thank you for the information. I thought this was wrong to begin with. Laser102 Oct 2015 #19
Same Nate Silver who predicted Scott Walker would get GOP nom? HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #14
When did he predict that? Sliceo Oct 2015 #77
This is a lie oberliner Oct 2015 #82
Is that the same Nate Silver Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #21
Nope. That was someone on his staff. Adrahil Oct 2015 #26
Just like it was someone on Hillary's staff who ordered the backup server to overwrite data leveymg Oct 2015 #29
What? Adrahil Oct 2015 #49
Movement in a deep downward shift for Clinton, and a one hell of a jump for Bernie. Time_Lord Oct 2015 #60
We shall see. It could happen. But I doubt it. Adrahil Oct 2015 #66
You'd be amazed... Time_Lord Oct 2015 #67
His rise is not out of line with previous "insurgent" candidates. Adrahil Oct 2015 #74
Some of this Sander support is starting to look like FUD and acting like it too uponit7771 Oct 2015 #75
"Sanders has plateaued" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #42
Well, that's what the data shows.... Adrahil Oct 2015 #48
This is also a lie oberliner Oct 2015 #83
This was a phone poll. And if they contacted people who do not use landlines sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #43
To be fair, she'd just seen a small bump moving her up against challengers. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3
Online poll? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #7
Apparently a "survey" with a "credibility interval" of + or - 4.5....not even an on-line poll! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #13
I know nothing about Bayesian statistics magical thyme Oct 2015 #23
Possibly she did go down.... Adrahil Oct 2015 #27
Just last week all the rage was a "survey" claiming Sanders leads in all 50 states! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #33
Explain the science behind polls re Primary Candidates that include people who are not running? sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #44
How can I put this more succinctly and clearly? Let me borrow a phrase, modified: Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #46
How can I put this succintly? I do not like h or her supporters. artislife Oct 2015 #50
Even so, the low 40's is where many of the polls have found her support to be HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #16
But their headline is written for its sensationalism - "Clinton down 10 points"!! HORROR! George II Oct 2015 #31
Polls, or no polls SmittynMo Oct 2015 #17
Her supporters can spin this any way they want Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #20
So, is she toast? Helen Borg Oct 2015 #22
Not yet. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #25
Clinton Machine is on its very last legs.. Time_Lord Oct 2015 #61
Better headline: "Polls Swing 5 Points in Either Direction on a Regular Basis" DLnyc Oct 2015 #24
Another better headline: "Wild Swings in Clinton Popularity Are Within 9% 'Credibility Interval'*" Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #30
Even if Sanders sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #28
Congrats...first out of the gate with the "it is all fixed" refrain! And it is only October! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #32
I honestly didn't expect that until late night Super Tuesday wyldwolf Oct 2015 #34
Of course you wouldn't. sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #36
your reply is completely irrelevant to the conversation. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #37
The conspiracy cards have not yet been played, but they have been shuffled and are on the table. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #39
I referenced the 1944 Democratic Convention sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #40
So? wyldwolf Oct 2015 #45
P-l-e-a-s-e sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #57
If you have an issue with how and why Truman replaced Wallace.. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #58
I do, sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #63
You act as though Wallace had some kind of right to be FDR's veep wyldwolf Oct 2015 #70
You know what projection is? sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #72
something that in no way applies here wyldwolf Oct 2015 #73
Wallace won the first ballot sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #79
And eventually lost, as he did in the general of '48. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #85
What do you have against Henry Wallace? sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #87
other than the historical revisionism the left have created around him, nothing. wyldwolf Oct 2015 #88
Please don't put your words sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #35
If this is true, why didn't she get the nomination in '08? lunamagica Oct 2015 #47
She didn't get it in '08 sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #56
So, are you saying that Hillary legitimately won the nomination and it was taken from her? lunamagica Oct 2015 #65
What I'm saying is there is no 'rightful' nominee, sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #68
Please feel free to explain how this would happen? mythology Oct 2015 #86
You can do all sorts of things: sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #89
stay the course, Hillary FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #38
Full-speed ahead, Hillary, damn the torpedoes and the icebergs, and the rock jetty to starboard. leveymg Oct 2015 #51
Those poor passengers FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #53
Don't worry, the First Class pool has a lifeguard. We know our priorities on this cruise line. leveymg Oct 2015 #55
Touché! nt FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #69
The poll shows a promising trend: Democrats are waking up senz Oct 2015 #41
It's not clear which Hillary is polled. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #52
"It's not clear which Hillary was polled" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #54
LOL. There have been more Hillarys than there are hifiguy Oct 2015 #71
Online poll, click bait screaming headline workinclasszero Oct 2015 #64
That poll is suspect.. it jumps around erratically. DCBob Oct 2015 #80
"click bait screaming headline" left-of-center2012 Oct 2015 #90
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton down 10 points in...»Reply #56