Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

askew

(1,464 posts)
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 10:36 PM Oct 2015

Ugly New Revelations for Hillary & Email Saga [View all]

Some new ugly revelations for Hillary today:

Via McClatchy:


Hillary Clinton hired a Connecticut company to back up her emails on a “cloud” storage system, and her lawyers have agreed to turn whatever it contains over to the FBI, a personal familiar with the situation said Tuesday.

The disclosure came as a Republican Senate committee chairman, Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, also asked the firm to turn over to the committee copies of any Clinton emails still in its possession.

Datto Inc., based in Norwalk, Conn., became the second data storage firm to become entangled in the inquiry into Clinton’s unusual email arrangement, which has sparked a furor that has dogged her campaign. In August, Clinton and the firm that had managed her server since June 2013, Colorado-based Platte River Networks, agreed to surrender it for examination by the FBI.

On Friday, Clinton’s attorney, David Kendall, and Platte River agreed to allow Datto to turn over the data from the backup server to the FBI, said the person familiar with Datto’s storage, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Datto said in a statement that “with the consent of our client and their end user, and consistent with our policies regarding data privacy, Datto is working with the FBI to provide data in conjunction with its investigation.”

The source said, however, that Platte River had set up a 60-day retention policy for the backup server, meaning that any emails to which incremental changes were made at least 60 days prior would be deleted and “gone forever.” While the server wouldn’t have been “wiped clean,” the source said, any underlying data likely would have been written over and would be difficult to recover.

On May 31, 2013, four months after Clinton left office, the Clinton Executive Service Corp., which oversaw her email server contracts, hired Platte River to maintain her account. Its New Jersey-based server replaced the server in her New York home that had handled her emails throughout her tenure as secretary of state.

Several weeks ago, Platte River employees discovered that her private server was syncing with an offsite Datto server, he said.

When Datto acknowledged that was the case, a Platte River employee replied in an email: “This is a problem.”

Johnson said that “Datto apparently possessed a backup of the server’s contents since June 2013.”

Upon that discovery, Platte River “directed Datto to not delete the saved data and worked with Datto to find a way to move the saved information . . . back to Secretary Clinton’s private server.”

The letter also noted that Platte River employees were directed to reduce the amount of email data being stored with each backup. Late this summer, Johnson wrote, a Platte River employee took note of this change and inquired whether the company could search its archives for an email from Clinton Executive Service Corp. directing such a reduction in October or November 2014 and then again around February, advising Platte River to save only emails sent during the most recent 30 days.

Those reductions would have occurred after the State Department requested that Clinton turn over her emails.

It was here that a Platte River employee voiced suspicions about a cover-up and sought to protect the company. “If we have it in writing that they told us to cut the backups,” the employee wrote, “and that we can go public with our statement saying we have had backups since day one, then we were told to trim to 30 days, it would make us look a WHOLE LOT better,” according to the email cited by Johnson.

In the letter to Austin McChord, Datto’s CEO, Johnson asked the firm to produce copies of all communications it had relating to Clinton’s server, including those with Platte River and the Clinton firm.” He also asked whether Datto and its employees were authorized to store and view classified information and for details of any cyberattacks on the backup server.


Also, new emails were released from Hillary's top aide, Cheryl Mills, that showed she sent emails to Clinton Foundation that are now considered classified via Politico.


Hillary Clinton’s No. 2 at the State Department twice forwarded information to the Clinton Foundation that was later deemed classified, the latest instance of former Clinton staff transmitting now-classified information.
According to a new email chain shared with POLITICO by Citizens United, Cheryl Mills — Clinton's former chief of state at State — forwarded State Department background information about Rwanda and the Congo to the Clintons' philanthropic organization. Citizens United, a conservative activist group, obtained the messages via a Freedom of Information act lawsuit.
Story Continued Below
Former President Bill Clinton was visiting Africa, including Rwanda, around the time that Mills sent the email, which was mostly redacted. Former president Clinton was also considering giving Rwandan President Paul Kagame a plenary role at the Clinton Global Initiative, according to the emails.

The information in the 2012 emails was classified by the State Department in July of this year because of national security and foreign policy reasons, according to the documents. The classification specifically related to foreign government information and intelligence activities, sources or methods, according to the redaction labels.


Since Foreign Government Information is considered classified "at birth", those emails were likely classified at the time Mills forwarded them.

Expect this drip, drip, drip to continue with the email saga as we find out Hillary's been hiding information on the emails from the public.




136 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Looks Like A Troll OP. Not Worth The Time To Read. TheMastersNemesis Oct 2015 #1
Lol, member since 2003. Nt Logical Oct 2015 #2
WTF= "Clinton Executive Service Corp"??? MindfulOne Oct 2015 #78
Yeah, this is the first I've heard about that Corp. askew Oct 2015 #83
Yes reporting the news makes me a troll. askew Oct 2015 #4
Yea, love those GOP facts. Thank you for regurgitating them here for us. leftofcool Oct 2015 #11
It's all they have... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #12
Thank you for making it look like Democrats don't care about facts. RiverLover Oct 2015 #14
Thank you for being a stalwart Democrat who doesn't flinch when attacked by a swarm of... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #20
berniemoonies enid602 Oct 2015 #42
Sickening isn't it? workinclasszero Oct 2015 #53
funny, you have no problem with people posting what republicans say about Bernie. marym625 Oct 2015 #82
I defend democrats on "democratic" underground vs republicans all the time workinclasszero Oct 2015 #85
Just keep grasping at straws marym625 Oct 2015 #89
And Bernie Sanders voted to protect gun manufacturers after massacres involving the use workinclasszero Oct 2015 #93
wrong. And again, you ignore your hypocrisy marym625 Oct 2015 #100
She voted for No Child Left Behind? NealK Oct 2015 #125
bernie enid602 Oct 2015 #98
I never said you did marym625 Oct 2015 #101
"This site hates democrats worse than hate radio/fox." NealK Oct 2015 #130
What an ugly name you decided to grace us with artislife Oct 2015 #76
berniemoonies? NealK Oct 2015 #127
I'm sorry, but federal rules regarding digital evidence Fawke Em Oct 2015 #72
They aren't GOP facts. They are facts. askew Oct 2015 #84
Is CNN verboten too? NealK Oct 2015 #126
It's fucking McClatchy, hardly a troll. morningfog Oct 2015 #29
McClatchy is really one of the last decent print news organizations questionseverything Oct 2015 #106
You do realize that a federal evidentiary digital chain of custody law Fawke Em Oct 2015 #69
kick for later 840high Oct 2015 #3
Note the two orders to destroy the email received after subpoena. OOJ leveymg Oct 2015 #5
Yeah, that seems pretty serious. askew Oct 2015 #6
Looks troublesome for Clinton's loyal employee HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #31
There is no question HRC ordered the system set up. This makes it more likely that the AG leveymg Oct 2015 #38
wish I could rec a thread. magical thyme Oct 2015 #17
I'll say it again: Obstruction of Justice (OOJ), 18 USC 1505 leveymg Oct 2015 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #40
... NealK Oct 2015 #128
It was allowed . . . I take responsibility. leveymg Oct 2015 #134
Cool. NealK Oct 2015 #136
You mean, like, with a cloth?.... Indepatriot Oct 2015 #7
Wow, from the OP it clearly looks like a coverup dreamnightwind Oct 2015 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #16
more likely somebody on her staff will take the fall. magical thyme Oct 2015 #18
If by "take the fall" you mean "be thrown to the wolves" Fumesucker Oct 2015 #27
or under the bus, or whatever the magical thyme Oct 2015 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #28
Who will be her Scooter Libby? Jester Messiah Oct 2015 #107
There always was a big deal. Her team completely botched the security of her server. jeff47 Oct 2015 #97
Benghazi stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #9
When all you have is a hammer the whole world looks like a nail. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #22
Not Benghazi. Fawke Em Oct 2015 #77
+1 NealK Oct 2015 #129
Another not there story. Aren't you getting tired of the BS from the GOP? leftofcool Oct 2015 #10
It's all they have... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #21
Drip, drip, drip. 99Forever Oct 2015 #13
You know its bad when Obama's current state dept has to get involved and use the court system RiverLover Oct 2015 #15
CNN backs it up magical thyme Oct 2015 #19
So does WaPo. RiverLover Oct 2015 #23
The use of the word "Ugly" is enough to classify this as a hit piece. nt Nitram Oct 2015 #25
Perhaps "shaddy" would be a more accurate description? Fumesucker Oct 2015 #26
Shoddy? nt Nitram Oct 2015 #30
more likely shady. magical thyme Oct 2015 #51
Trey? Is that you? nt Adrahil Oct 2015 #32
It is all they have DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #34
Damn. They keep getting closer. What's next for the electron microscope approach to journalism? randome Oct 2015 #36
is anyone concerned restorefreedom Oct 2015 #33
I'm concerned about it. askew Oct 2015 #86
How Team Clinton botched the security on her email server jeff47 Oct 2015 #95
Concerned? More like whomper-jawed. winter is coming Oct 2015 #104
Putting sensitive information on the cloud is abolutely irresponsible. Maedhros Oct 2015 #117
Yeah, I'd be fired for that. askew Oct 2015 #120
that is what i don't i understand restorefreedom Oct 2015 #121
yes. and the finger-pointing has begun... magical thyme Oct 2015 #122
Raise your hand if you remember Watergate. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #37
The FBI is investigating to answer that very Q. RiverLover Oct 2015 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #44
I'd answer that if it made any sense. RiverLover Oct 2015 #47
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #50
No. RiverLover Oct 2015 #59
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #66
OK RiverLover Oct 2015 #79
There are some really big lawsuits that won't be heard until February. askew Oct 2015 #88
You're not getting it. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #60
One last time and the I'm done here. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #64
None of this will help your hapless candidate. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #41
"Hapless candidate." Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #46
We have something in common DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #48
Well, I do have one advantage it seems. Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #49
You mean the trajectory that has the Vermont independent looking up at a candidate who isn't ... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #52
And further . . . Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #57
I predict she will rip Trey Gowdy's heart out and show it to him before he dies. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #63
Did you forget your comity advice? aspirant Oct 2015 #67
Did you forget your comity advice? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #68
And your subscribed, sagacious advice aspirant Oct 2015 #102
Precisely. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #103
It doesn't say "physically assault" aspirant Oct 2015 #108
This is obscurantism on steroids DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #111
Then Malcolm should have made it perfectly clear, aspirant Oct 2015 #114
Then Malcolm should have made it perfectly clear. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #115
About as much sense as using aspirant Oct 2015 #118
I suspect most reasonable people understand it is a parable as Jesus spoke in parables. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #119
No, it is your SUBJECTIVE assertion, not mine aspirant Oct 2015 #133
The testifying could give her a bump. askew Oct 2015 #94
Truths, what happened to your comity aspirant Oct 2015 #56
Where's the comity? DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #65
No it's here on your post aspirant Oct 2015 #70
The only difference ... DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #71
If you don't practice comity aspirant Oct 2015 #73
We are all sinners. We aren't perfect until we get to Heaven. DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2015 #75
Raise your hand if you remember Filegate and Whitewater emulatorloo Oct 2015 #132
The FBI does not investigate "big nothings" PDittie Oct 2015 #43
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #54
No and no. PDittie Oct 2015 #61
I think it will be the IT guy and Cheryl Mills. askew Oct 2015 #99
Yes, will they fall on their swords to protect the boss? HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #124
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #58
Thanks. This issue really needs to be discussed. askew Oct 2015 #90
I guess now we can expect Biden to announce his candidacy shortly darkangel218 Oct 2015 #62
Will she be using "I'm not a crook" as a campaign slogan? Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #74
By now and countless threads with back and forths artislife Oct 2015 #80
Well...the rich and powerful live by different rules and change them when necessary. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #81
Yes they do artislife Oct 2015 #87
Wow. Almost getting funny now. TwilightGardener Oct 2015 #91
I thought there was a 4 paragraph rule on DU. hrmjustin Oct 2015 #92
.. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #96
is that a campaign slogan? questionseverything Oct 2015 #105
Nope, just my response to a rightwing hit job. MoonRiver Oct 2015 #109
mcclathy, cnn and washington post questionseverything Oct 2015 #110
This may account for floriduck Oct 2015 #112
This is what the Cloud is like. apnu Oct 2015 #113
I thought the e-mail story was losing legs, looks like I was wrong ram2008 Oct 2015 #116
No, you are still wrong. One hoax down....another hoax by the SAME hoaxsters...you may believe? Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #123
K&R NealK Oct 2015 #131
If she had simply cooperated with the FOIA requests while she was SOS.... Dems to Win Oct 2015 #135
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ugly New Revelations for ...»Reply #0