2016 Postmortem

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)

75. I don't play your games.

Sat Sep 26, 2015, 07:02 PM

Sep 2015

You people are making enough rules around here.

I don't play your games because you make up the rules as you go.

Sanders is a fool. He's all unicorns and rainbows and has no capability to ever deliver on a single promise because even if by some MIRACLE he did become president, the Congress would never work with him and he wouldn't even have the power of the veto because the Congress would override his bullshit time after time after time. I am not getting on your magic bus to the promised Bernieland because IT DOES NOT AND WILL NEVER EXIST!

I won't vote for him. Ever.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

91 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders WILL NOT choose anyone from Wall Street for his cabinet: [View all] Fawke Em Sep 2015 OP

... but then he'll have to return all that Wall Street Super PAC money portlander23 Sep 2015 #1

Ha! Fawke Em Sep 2015 #2

And that's the 'problem' AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #3

The problem for whom? HereSince1628 Sep 2015 #7

The 1 percent - not us average folks. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #8

Hence no endorsements from politicians AgingAmerican Sep 2015 #9

I had to point that out to a Hillary supporter who was bragging on all of Clinton's Dustlawyer Sep 2015 #32

1 percent is 3 million voters yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #38

Only the wealthy few have access to the golden eggs. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #30

No more Wall Streeters. Cenk Uygur's Team looks good. Add Pikkety with a visa. appalachiablue Sep 2015 #80

Absolutely! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #90

Obama didn't put anyone from Wall Street in his cabinet Recursion Sep 2015 #58

This alone is reason enough to vote for him. nt. Juicy_Bellows Sep 2015 #4

Wouldn't that be a breath of fresh air? eom Fawke Em Sep 2015 #13

Does that exclude Hillary Travis_0004 Sep 2015 #5

! Fawke Em Sep 2015 #14

FFS does that count as "Wall Street" now? (nt) Recursion Sep 2015 #65

I hope their feelings won't be hurt. aidbo Sep 2015 #6

Good and that is a question all candidates should be asked, who will they have in their sabrina 1 Sep 2015 #10

I can believe that moobu2 Sep 2015 #11

Uh huh... SoapBox Sep 2015 #21

That is a mean spirited thing to say. Enthusiast Sep 2015 #31

You must not read any Bernie worshipers comments if you think that was mean. moobu2 Sep 2015 #61

How can you be so sure? JDPriestly Sep 2015 #45

Makes sense since he'll never have to choose a cabinet. eom MohRokTah Sep 2015 #12

Sez the insider. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #15

. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #17

I purposely misspelled. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #40

The only people standing in the way of Sanders... MohRokTah Sep 2015 #41

You mean how economics work for YOU. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #42

I mean how economics work period. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #43

I know supply side doesn't work. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #47

I know Sandernomics is total bullshit. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #48

Yeah. bvar22 Sep 2015 #70

. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #73

I see (and everyone else saw too) that you FAILED the challenge, bvar22 Sep 2015 #74

I don't play your games. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #75

Can you please provide some links to support your position that bvar22 Sep 2015 #76

Again, you demand I play YOUR games by YOUR rules. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #77

What economic ideas of Sanders aren't feasible? Single payer? $15 minimum wage? think Sep 2015 #78

I don't play YOUR games by YOUR rules, eom MohRokTah Sep 2015 #79

In other words, you can't answer the question. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #83

This message was self-deleted by its author MohRokTah Sep 2015 #85

You don't walk very fast. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #86

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! MohRokTah Sep 2015 #89

How is discussing the issues you call unicorns & rainbows in anyway "playing games"? think Sep 2015 #91

Do you realize parties have changed since then? Fawke Em Sep 2015 #82

This message was self-deleted by its author MohRokTah Sep 2015 #84

Ooohhh... you're scared. Fawke Em Sep 2015 #87

No, I'm disgusted. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #88

What plans would those be NorthCarolina Sep 2015 #60

That's exactly what I was going to post. He won't have to deal with this issue. Metric System Sep 2015 #16

Because they consult you, right? roguevalley Sep 2015 #23

So you're hoping Hillary.... daleanime Sep 2015 #18

I have no problem with Wall Street insiders being appointed to appropriate positions. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #22

And of course only insiders who have and will.... daleanime Sep 2015 #25

What you suggest is illegal. eom MohRokTah Sep 2015 #26

Why would anyone make.... daleanime Sep 2015 #27

Ah, the game .... which is why we don't have single payer or even public option. Jackilope Sep 2015 #35

You are adorable. nt TeamPooka Sep 2015 #36

Ted Bundy could have helped us catch serial killers who like to murder women. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #49

And bicycles could also be fish. MohRokTah Sep 2015 #50

I used precisely the logic you did. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #51

No, you didn't MohRokTah Sep 2015 #52

Don't care to alert on you, at least not at this point. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #53

Yeah, like I'm supposed to believe you. eom MohRokTah Sep 2015 #54

Not necessarily. Those who possess adult logic constructs needn't believe me. DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2015 #55

Sanders isn't going to have a cabinet. n/t murielm99 Sep 2015 #19

Sorry, no cabinet for Sanders leftofcool Sep 2015 #20

ah. sad roguevalley Sep 2015 #24

Kicked and recommended! We absolutely must elect Bernie! Enthusiast Sep 2015 #28

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Sep 2015 #29

Wow.... concreteblue Sep 2015 #33

And they are so original. Live and Learn Sep 2015 #37

Truth. They have completely lost it. PowerToThePeople Sep 2015 #81

It would not bother me if he did, FDR's cabinet was effective with many from Wall Street... uponit7771 Sep 2015 #34

Geez - another No Shit Sherlock moment FreakinDJ Sep 2015 #39

I hope that those in the Mainstream Media who cannot figure out how Bernie became so popular JDPriestly Sep 2015 #44

K&R. JDPriestly Sep 2015 #46

I'd rather see no cabinet than one packed with banksters and CEOs. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #56

You think anyone who's worked in the banking industry or as a CEO shouldn't be in the cabinet? Recursion Sep 2015 #62

Yes. I see it as a conflict of interest. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #63

Wow Recursion Sep 2015 #64

Well, I wouldn't want to see someone from the defense industry running the department of defense or Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2015 #66

I'd like to see most of them at the DOJ... AppalachianAmerican Sep 2015 #71

Who from Wall Street did Obama put on his cabinet? (nt) Recursion Sep 2015 #57

Jack Lew, Sec. of Treasury, comes to mind 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #67

Thanks, I missed Lew Recursion Sep 2015 #72

He's getting alittle ahead of himself. FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #59

He's candidly telling voters what they can (and can't) expect, once he's elected POTUS 99th_Monkey Sep 2015 #68

Good. That's one group who don't need any more representation than they already have Cheese Sandwich Sep 2015 #69