Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Fredjust

(52 posts)

5. For that matter...

Reply to sellitman (Original post)

Sun Jul 22, 2012, 04:56 PM

Jul 2012

I don't see in the constitution where people should be allowed to own ANY guns. If you aren't in a well-regulated militia, you shouldn't be allowed to touch a gun. Period. And no, I don't care about hunters. They're mostly redneck Rethuglicans anyway.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jason Alexander's Rightous Rant on Gun laws. [View all] sellitman Jul 2012 OP

you need to include the correction on the 100,000 deaths.. DCBob Jul 2012 #1

wow - is that domestic gun violence stat real? That is a pretty sad commentary. DrDan Jul 2012 #2

I also made a bit of mistake.. here's the exact statistic from the Brady campaign. DCBob Jul 2012 #3

Effective plasmicmike Jul 2012 #8

NRA, Faux and other RW media have done a great job of demonizing any attempts of sanity. DCBob Jul 2012 #12

Sadly, when the government decides to spy on Americans w/o warrants, rhett o rick Jul 2012 #4

For that matter... Fredjust Jul 2012 #5

you'd throw away tons of (liberal) votes with the line about hunters. dionysus Jul 2012 #6

You are correct sellitman Jul 2012 #7

My deer-hunting, McGovern-voting father would disagree with you. Arkana Jul 2012 #10

GEORGE IS GETTIN' UPSET! Arkana Jul 2012 #9

Why single out assault rifles? plasmicmike Jul 2012 #11