2016 Postmortem

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)

7. Fred, I will talk to you because you are rational.

Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:08 AM

Aug 2015

There are different layers of security that are a function of the sensitivity of the information being transmitted . If any government employee was knowingly sending or receiving sensitive information he would be just as culpable is if he used a yougov or private email address. There are whole other systems and protocols for handling known sensitive information. That salient fact is being deliberately buried in these conversations.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CNN and Reuters: Inspectors General concluded Clinton emails presumed classified [View all] leveymg Aug 2015 OP

Talk about a desperate media going into the weeds to find....something, something.....strange Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #1

Is "lack of judgment" something you want in a President? forthemiddle Aug 2015 #13

Because if the "judgment" label peels off maybe the folks will buy the "arrogant" label....funny stuff. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #15

Guess what forthemiddle Aug 2015 #22

Whew! Good to know! At least I convinced someone at DU to not vote for Trump. My work on Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #24

LOL forthemiddle Aug 2015 #25

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #55

Whitewater all over again mcar Aug 2015 #16

BENGHAZI!!11 BlueCaliDem Aug 2015 #26

Well said. nt Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 #49

Clinton loyalists won't believe a word of it. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #2

Clinton "loyalists" understand that allying with the propaganda of the corporate mass media is a bad move. Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #4

Most people will think you are the propagandist here. Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #6

The only thing "seriously damaged" has been the credibility of the corporate mass media, but Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #9

Fred, I will talk to you because you are rational. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #7

My fear is that the FBI/DoJ investigations won't be done until after she wins the primary askew Aug 2015 #18

It seems very likely the investigations will go beyond super-Tuesday HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #30

I know I am speculating Puzzledtraveller Aug 2015 #43

The relevant statute with the operative word italicized DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #3

That's Sec. 1924, a different section of the Act. See, Sec. 793, link below leveymg Aug 2015 #8

You are citing the Espionage Act and ignoring the Preamble... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #10

That section refers to different crimes as specified at subsections (a),(b) and (c) leveymg Aug 2015 #11

Precisely DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #14

You're citing from a different part of the Act. Note the different language, particularly at (f) leveymg Aug 2015 #23

Before we continue I need documentation DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #31

That's detailed in the Reuters article, linked above. leveymg Aug 2015 #34

From said article DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #35

The spokesman is at odds with the Department's own IG. Recall that both the State and IC IGs leveymg Aug 2015 #38

There is an interdepartmental dispute about classification. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #40

But, the DOJ now has a lot of leverage. Sec. 793 felony or plead down to Sec. 1924. Leverage leveymg Aug 2015 #48

BUt, but, but... HereSince1628 Aug 2015 #5

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #12

Polls show that isn't true. People are paying attention and her trustworthy #s are askew Aug 2015 #19

And polls are always, always spot on, right, askew? BlueCaliDem Aug 2015 #29

Nope. They sure don't...unless they're rooting for her opponent(s). BlueCaliDem Aug 2015 #28

"Screwed up email" might be omission of caps, bad spelling, and run-on sentences. leveymg Aug 2015 #32

Clinton is filthy rich, and the chosen candidate of the oligarchs, so Zorra Aug 2015 #17

You say "rich" like earned wealth accumulated by public service through a life time is a bad thing....that is what is turning a lot of folks off... Fred Sanders Aug 2015 #21

Help me understand zalinda Aug 2015 #20

The issues with her use of a private, unsecured email server involve classified information leveymg Aug 2015 #27

You are misstating the law. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #33

You need to specify how you think there's a misstatement. You still haven't. leveymg Aug 2015 #36

Okay DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #37

The State Dept. made no such determination about any laws broken. That's a fallacy. leveymg Aug 2015 #39

Of course "gross negligence" is a criminal standard... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #41

Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #42

No, the FBI is NOT investigating Hillary - not their A Team, their B Team, or their C Team. George II Aug 2015 #44

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2015 #45

She is not a target. n/t ColesCountyDem Aug 2015 #46

Just her unauthorized server on which she had classified information is the target. At this point. leveymg Aug 2015 #58

Thanks for following this and doing these updates. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #47

Here are some more updates...most not mentioned on this thread... Sancho Aug 2015 #50

From a reliable source as opposed to Facebook, personal attorney, or political ally Media Matters. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #53

This report has been debunked.... Sancho Aug 2015 #54

It has not been debunked. The FBI has taken over the investigation which is still in progress. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #56

Like the links said... Sancho Aug 2015 #57

Nothing from nothing is still nothing. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #51

Trouble In Paradise cantbeserious Aug 2015 #52