2016 Postmortem

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)

104. yep, definitely true

Reply to PatrickforO (Reply #71)

Fri Aug 28, 2015, 12:34 PM

Aug 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

263 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton's Felony. The federal laws violated by the private server [View all] leveymg Aug 2015 OP

This belongs in CT. nt DURHAM D Aug 2015 #1

Yup! KMOD Aug 2015 #3

Why are outright lying smears of DEMOCRATIC candidates allowed on DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND? randys1 Aug 2015 #90

I dont know but this is getting very old quick moobu2 Aug 2015 #166

Either the jury system Jamaal510 Aug 2015 #201

Um, because some are true? nt revbones Mar 2016 #238

For those who can't or won't discuss the facts or the law, there is always the comfort of snide leveymg Aug 2015 #4

Are you an expert on this? Seeing as you're a Sanders supporter you're certainly biased and have an Metric System Aug 2015 #7

the sources are clearly experts magical thyme Aug 2015 #60

And Hillary Clinton certainly never transferred classified info to her server. Huddie94 Aug 2015 #230

they were trained to recognize classified information magical thyme Aug 2015 #231

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2015 #235

if I understand something I read yesterday correctly, it was Abedin who magical thyme Sep 2015 #236

Ad hom. Jester Messiah Aug 2015 #103

It's all they have when faced with something negative about their candidate. nt revbones Mar 2016 #239

You might possible be right!! pocoloco Aug 2015 #109

As agendas go, that seems a pretty laudable one Bubzer Aug 2015 #137

Your headline is an opinion -not a fact. Take it down please. riversedge Aug 2015 #64

Agreed: Riversedge: Hillary has done nothing wrong lewebley3 Aug 2015 #118

Besides, Hillary can still run for Preident, bvar22 Aug 2015 #176

So if that's true then dispute it with facts. revbones Mar 2016 #240

Your OP isn't a "smear"? This issue has been discredited over and over again, and has been... George II Aug 2015 #157

It has not been discredited even once, let alone over and over. revbones Mar 2016 #241

You have called Hillary Clinton a felon! That is FALSE, unconscionable, and inexcusable. George II Aug 2015 #158

No not quite. elehhhhna Mar 2016 #251

Why because you don't like it? CT is over used to lock or hide posts that some find contrary rhett o rick Aug 2015 #30

and this belongs in - DURHAM D Aug 2015 #39

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #54

I have no problem with this post, however, yesterday when a thread was posted about Bernie applying still_one Aug 2015 #89

I missed that. Can you provide a link? nm rhett o rick Aug 2015 #110

What is CT??? PatrickforO Aug 2015 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #69

Oh. Thanks. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #73

Thanks. nt Raymondo22 Aug 2015 #211

CT=Conspiracy theory hedda_foil Feb 2016 #237

Why is this post Okay: its filled with slander: Hillary is not under investigation lewebley3 Aug 2015 #95

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #107

But , The Host are very careful to hide post that disagree Sanders people lewebley3 Aug 2015 #115

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #124

So you're aware of all the intricacies of the investigation revbones Mar 2016 #242

..... MADem Aug 2015 #2

Nothing would make me happier than a long orange line down Penn Ave of Bush-era leveymg Aug 2015 #6

Justice: Probe sought in Clinton e-mails, but no ‘criminal’ focus Fla Dem Aug 2015 #151

Amazing how many "Democrats" are so eager to throw one of their own MADem Aug 2015 #193

Precisely. She should have thought about what she was doing, but it isn't as if she erased JDPriestly Aug 2015 #146

unfortunately the president decided to turn the page or look forward or some idiotic Doctor_J Aug 2015 #192

You have no shame. I see you're a Sanders supporter. What a shocker. I see two fellow Sanders Metric System Aug 2015 #5

Hillary supporters also owe it to themselves to learn about her legal problems. leveymg Aug 2015 #8

Are you a legal expert? What are your credentials? Metric System Aug 2015 #12

You're over the line with this brush Aug 2015 #15

Why do you assume this is an attack? It's an analysis of facts and law. Dispute it on that basis leveymg Aug 2015 #18

Are you a legal expert? Metric System Aug 2015 #20

Read the article and links - make your own determination. leveymg Aug 2015 #23

Short answer - No. But (s)he stayed in Holiday Inn Express. nt COLGATE4 Aug 2015 #114

Your amateurish analysis is worth the paper it's printed on. n/t pnwmom Aug 2015 #117

Of course it's an attack brush Aug 2015 #43

Believe it or not FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #52

So why are you on this site? brush Aug 2015 #59

Pathetic FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #75

Like I said, it's called DEMOCRATIC Underground brush Aug 2015 #80

Aren't we also here to discuss the pros and cons of the different candidates? Raymondo22 Aug 2015 #212

In many cases the criticisms have ventured into . . . brush Aug 2015 #216

"Over-the-top"? Raymondo22 Aug 2015 #217

A headline of an OP stated that Hillary Clinton committed a felony . . . brush Aug 2015 #218

Those are examples. A definition would be more useful to me. Raymondo22 Aug 2015 #219

Don't know why that's hard to understand brush Aug 2015 #220

So it's OK to say something good about a Dem primary candidate--- Raymondo22 Aug 2015 #224

As I stated in my earlier post . . . brush Aug 2015 #227

Thanks for the examples. Raymondo22 Aug 2015 #233

Exactly... busterbrown Aug 2015 #144

Oh for FUCKS sake, I am more liberal than you and your ten best friends and your randys1 Aug 2015 #98

If there is indeed a felony that could stick, based on the facts and legal statutes ... Martin Eden Aug 2015 #133

If I beat my wife, I would be in trouble too. randys1 Aug 2015 #135

The felony cited is a violation of the Espionage Act of 1917 DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #143

SMearing Hillary on DU is an all day , every day event randys1 Aug 2015 #149

So then, you are certain there is no legal case that could derail HC in the general election ... Martin Eden Aug 2015 #147

Thanks for giving voice to my feelings. Candidates that "play the game" are not what I want erronis Aug 2015 #134

They can play the game all they want, as long as they arent republicans or teaparty randys1 Aug 2015 #136

If you're a Sanders supporter let his campaign stand on its own. AlbertCat Aug 2015 #70

I'm one of the ones who thinks Dems should not be attacking other Dems brush Aug 2015 #76

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #78

I'm one of the ones who thinks Dems should not be attacking other Dems AlbertCat Aug 2015 #85

I've mentioned that Bernie himself has refused to attack Hillary brush Aug 2015 #93

Stop doing repug dirty work. AlbertCat Aug 2015 #122

Don't lie. Onlooker Aug 2015 #203

Addressing these issues is part of letting the campaign play out. frylock Aug 2015 #77

Let the repugs do their own dirty work. brush Aug 2015 #83

Looks like Obama's DoJ is doing the repug's "dirty work" frylock Aug 2015 #100

After the repugs have been fanning the flames for months brush Aug 2015 #123

And it can all end with a phone call by the president.. frylock Aug 2015 #129

^^This and only this^^ nt tblue Aug 2015 #229

Because you (and a few Bernie supporters) and the republicans say she has "legal problems"? ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #56

I am willing to litigate the charges with the seminal poster as long as he stipulates neither... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #79

Anyone who thinks this issue will disappear before the 2016 election has no clue. k&r, nt. appal_jack Aug 2015 #34

already has.. busterbrown Aug 2015 #142

This message was self-deleted by its author FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #35

yeah Hillary supporters are just so upright cali Aug 2015 #44

Was that thread made by a Hillary supporter? Judging by the poster's rec list I doubt it. Metric System Aug 2015 #51

You have no shame. AlbertCat Aug 2015 #65

add me to your list frylock Aug 2015 #72

Oh hell, this thread will have a hundred recs by the end of today. leftofcool Aug 2015 #112

They hate her. The can say they don't but tgey do. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #165

Oh noes now a third Sanders supporter is posting in this thread passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #196

To you "No shame" = speaking truth? That's weird. nt revbones Mar 2016 #243

Yikes! Mike Nelson Aug 2015 #9

You forgot the sarcasm tag. Metric System Aug 2015 #13

Thank you... Mike Nelson Aug 2015 #16

Most likely not a spy FlatBaroque Aug 2015 #37

Thanks, Mark hootinholler Aug 2015 #10

These articles disagree with you: Metric System Aug 2015 #11

Neither one of those articles even attempts a legal analysis by reference to relevant statutes jberryhill Aug 2015 #17

Is the OP qualified to give legal analysis? He still hasn't answered that question. Metric System Aug 2015 #19

Yes. leveymg Aug 2015 #21

Really? Gothmog Aug 2015 #120

You never answered my question but your posts tell me all I need to know Gothmog Apr 2016 #260

Well certainly neither of your op-ed writers are jberryhill Aug 2015 #22

It's an opinion presented as fact. Just look at the title: "Hillary's Felony." Metric System Aug 2015 #25

My goodness, an opinion presented as fact. On the internet. jberryhill Aug 2015 #27

If you have a different opinion based in fact, express it. Here's your chance. leveymg Aug 2015 #29

Clinton email violated no laws or policies Gothmog Aug 2015 #181

OMFG! an opinion presented as fact RoccoR5955 Aug 2015 #46

The second link goes to an article by David Ignatius DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #106

Good golly jberryhill Aug 2015 #116

I take umbrage at folks calling other folks felons, especially if the folks being called felons... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #125

Yes, the suggestion that a government official violated a law is offensive jberryhill Aug 2015 #127

You are using facts against a Howdy Gowdy inspired talking point Gothmog Aug 2015 #119

4 Sanders supporters and counting have recommended this thread. Interesting. Metric System Aug 2015 #14

The 9:00 am mass at the Church of the Perpetual Authenticity LuvLoogie Aug 2015 #26

What you are forgetting is that Democrats are held responsible when they break the law virtualobserver Aug 2015 #31

There would be more recs; but, ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #62

Interesting. AlbertCat Aug 2015 #74

I have here in my hand a list of 4 Sanders supporters and counting.... frylock Aug 2015 #81

and one has called bull pucky on it. passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #198

K&R for Metric System bahrbearian Aug 2015 #24

What a joke. I'm referring to your post and this thread. Metric System Aug 2015 #40

What's next? msrizzo Aug 2015 #28

Chuck Grassley recommends this post. KMOD Aug 2015 #32

What are your legal credentials? MohRokTah Aug 2015 #33

He doesn't have any. It's his opinion and, as they say, opinions are like assholes... Metric System Aug 2015 #36

I agree Gothmog Aug 2015 #175

What does that matter? Show where the post is wrong. Octafish Aug 2015 #225

Cool story, bro! Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #38

FYI: you were alerted on. Action_Patrol Aug 2015 #82

I'm sure... Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #84

I knew the meme. Made me smile Action_Patrol Aug 2015 #86

What were the results? Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #87

3-4 leave Action_Patrol Aug 2015 #92

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #94

Yeah... Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #102

I didn't know it was "old joke".. but i smiled 'cause it sounded like somebody the hell had to say Cha Aug 2015 #204

Why project your own hobbies to others? revbones Mar 2016 #244

Why are you gravedigging old threads from August of last year? Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #246

I just saw the ignorant comment on a thread in the latest threads list so I thought I'd reply. revbones Mar 2016 #249

That's funny. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #250

PS Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #247

When I first saw this thread on my phone I knew it would bring you 'lots of love'. Thanks for Purveyor Aug 2015 #41

You just know somewhere in DC Trey Gowdy is stroking it to this thread. Metric System Aug 2015 #42

Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #45

There was no classified content on her server, KMOD Aug 2015 #47

Then why does Obama's DNI IG say there was? jeff47 Aug 2015 #50

Because Chuck Grassley believes on of his emails KMOD Aug 2015 #53

Chuck Grassley controls Obama's intelligence agencies? jeff47 Aug 2015 #58

He's the one making the stink. KMOD Aug 2015 #63

No, the DNI Inspector General is also "making the stink". jeff47 Aug 2015 #66

Not true. Anonymous sources are making claims about the DNI IG. n/t pnwmom Aug 2015 #113

The DNI IG testified before Congress. jeff47 Aug 2015 #138

And he didn't say this during his testimony. n/t pnwmom Aug 2015 #140

He said they found classified emails during his testimony. (nt) jeff47 Aug 2015 #154

He didn't say they found emails that were classified at the time of origination. pnwmom Aug 2015 #155

It's just your opinion, as your supporters in this thread have argued. That's about as much thought Metric System Aug 2015 #48

Res ipsa loquitur DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author carolinayellowdog Aug 2015 #91

IMO, she's covered by the hole between 18 USC e and f jeff47 Aug 2015 #57

That's going too far. Jester Messiah Aug 2015 #108

Well, it would fucking help make our case against TPP Cry Aug 2015 #221

This post is a lie; Hillary is not being investigate for anything: Nothing but a GOP attack! lewebley3 Aug 2015 #61

Would Bernie Sanders say smut such as the OP? NO, he would not and woud be very riversedge Aug 2015 #67

Dude... JackInGreen Aug 2015 #68

At high levels of government the laws are subjective. Everyone knows this. PatrickforO Aug 2015 #71

yep, definitely true Fast Walker 52 Aug 2015 #104

Keep the recs coming! Yay right wing conspiracy theories on DU! DanTex Aug 2015 #88

You are using facts against a conservative talking point Gothmog Aug 2015 #173

It is our own bit of free republic right here. Makes me sick. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #174

I'm looking forward obnoxiousdrunk Aug 2015 #96

This message was self-deleted by its author Agschmid Aug 2015 #105

I thought the State Dept. already said everything was ok. jalan48 Aug 2015 #97

Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #99

Translation nichomachus Aug 2015 #101

Utter nonsense. Numerous NAMED, not anonymous, sources throughout government pnwmom Aug 2015 #111

What you have done is equivalent to posting laws against murder pnwmom Aug 2015 #121

Vince Foster knew that Hillary planned to ... JoePhilly Aug 2015 #128

Wow. You should make this an OP. Make sure you put the word "felony" pnwmom Aug 2015 #130

The plan had a name too .... REDRUM!!!! JoePhilly Aug 2015 #131

LOL SunSeeker Aug 2015 #161

The issue about the private server isn't going away Catherina Aug 2015 #126

What was hacked were the .gov accounts state department officials used, pnwmom Aug 2015 #139

hello CAtherina! grasswire Mar 2016 #252

This is where Sidney Blumenthal comes in, apparently. grasswire Mar 2016 #253

Why are these threads continuing? blackspade Aug 2015 #132

Thanks for saying that. KMOD Aug 2015 #145

Because some people lack confidence in their preferred candidate, so they post garbage about others. pnwmom Aug 2015 #153

This again? murielm99 Aug 2015 #141

... Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2015 #148

Recommended. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #150

SORRY, Righties, State Dept. Says There’s Nothing Illegal About Hillary’s Emails liberal N proud Aug 2015 #152

that is not the issue. grasswire Mar 2016 #254

What struck me about this post ... staggerleem Aug 2015 #156

A post from "an above board" Bernie supporter. brush Aug 2015 #163

+1,000,000! nt MADem Aug 2015 #194

Agreed, I will vote for the winner. The alternative will kill people. Period. Not acceptable. n/t freshwest Aug 2015 #197

".. this reply ws written by a REAL Bernie Sanders supporter... " Not someone spreading Cha Aug 2015 #205

This is old and simply not true - misrepresentations, lies, whatever - here are links to facts Sancho Aug 2015 #159

Bottom line: She would not need a team of lawyers to cover her @$$ if she Zorra Aug 2015 #160

Once you get to Hillary's rank in politics, you always have a team of lawyers passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #199

One of the most worthless OPs of the month. And that's saying something! randome Aug 2015 #162

One more hide and the poster takes a vacation. zappaman Aug 2015 #191

there are no more vacations for jury hides. grasswire Mar 2016 #255

Yes, the comment I made in August of 2015 is no longer valid. zappaman Mar 2016 #257

I didn't know Trey Gowdy had an account here. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #164

Exactly. This is something you would expect on GOP.con moobu2 Aug 2015 #167

The hatred of Hillary Clinton on this site is transparent. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #168

Dems are concerned this would blow up in the general. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #177

This garbage belongs at free republic. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #178

Nonsense. I suggest you attempt to understand the AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #182

Better? Get over yourself! hrmjustin Aug 2015 #183

Alrighty then. Another toxic primary it is. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #184

Then don't patronize me. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #185

Then I suggest first aid for your foot... Cry Aug 2015 #222

My foot is fine. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #232

Why go to the Free Republic when you can see the same material here Gothmog Apr 2016 #261

I have some questions for the seminal poster that I would request he or she answers DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #169

This post shows some Sanders supporters will just post anything to take Hillary down. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #170

A falsehood from start to finish. okasha Aug 2015 #171

Or back to free republic. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #172

Or maybe Cato Institute, okasha Aug 2015 #179

And yet the praises continue to come in. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #180

Trump has adoring fans, too. okasha Aug 2015 #186

Yes he woukd destroy garbage like this in a second. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #187

Oh look freeper/Limbaugh /Hannity /Fox news workinclasszero Aug 2015 #188

The Hillary Clinton e-mail ‘scandal’ that isn’t Gothmog Aug 2015 #189

Yawn. zappaman Aug 2015 #190

Short reply to this post... Rosco T. Aug 2015 #195

Can we PLEASE stop talking about bullshit like this, and disscuss eridani Aug 2015 #200

Are you a Republican? Onlooker Aug 2015 #202

The fact that you mention her private server shows that you don't understand this case Recursion Aug 2015 #206

Jesus Christ on a Trailer Hitch Hekate Aug 2015 #207

What a fucking pantload... SidDithers Aug 2015 #208

And you are completely wrong according to the AG who investigated Petreus stevenleser Aug 2015 #209

Hindsight is better than foresight and Madame Secretary's judgment is open to scrutiny... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #210

It don't taste like chicken.... John Poet Aug 2015 #213

OK, if the 1950s Records Act applies apnu Aug 2015 #214

Have you contacted the Attorney General to demand her indictment? brooklynite Aug 2015 #215

Gosh. Ex-CIA man is going to prison for getting a phone call from a reporter. Octafish Aug 2015 #223

Trying again, huh, good thing cooler heads prevail. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #226

Then why hasn't she been indicted? tblue Aug 2015 #228

Enough of this silly bullshit. RBInMaine Aug 2015 #234

If I were on the jury, Not Guilty. Call it jury nullification or whatever you like. Hoyt Mar 2016 #245

Kick for timeliness / FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #248

Hillary's "not marked classified" line or Jarqui Mar 2016 #256

Kick for visibility. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #258

Still missing a step. Orsino Mar 2016 #259

This makes me smile Gothmog Jul 2016 #262

So how did that work out for you? DanTex Jul 2016 #263