Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
64. O'Malley is not really concerned about the email story.
Tue Aug 18, 2015, 03:16 PM
Aug 2015

he's been retry constant about that. The Hill is pushing a meme as though he is. I posted this already in this thread and I am going to post it again, because context matters and the source that you posted took it out of context. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=526910


If you can. watch what he said in the interview, it is much more benign than is being portrayed in the OP. Here is a link to the transcript: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12812371

DICKERSON: So, is this funny now, this issue of the e-mails?

O'MALLEY: I think the most important issue is whether or not we still have the ability as a people to make the choices that make wages go up for Americans and make our economy work for all of us.

I'm sure that you have a legitimate question to ask, and Secretary Clinton and her lawyers can answer it. For my part as a candidate, I intend to put out the ideas and the policies that make college more affordable for more people, that expand Social Security, that get wages to go up again for a majority of us who are all working harder, instead of down.

So, that's what I'm going to talk about, John. And I will leave to you ask Secretary Clinton those other questions.

DICKERSON: Well, it's great, because you are doing exactly what her campaign says, which is, the e-mails are not about trust, people don't care about. What they care about is whether or not they trust to you take care of those issues. So, do you agree with that splitting of the way the electorate looks at the e-mail question?

O'MALLEY: I think the electorate actually looks at candidates in a very holistic way.

They ask, which of these candidates has the independence, the proven ability and experience and ideas that will actually serve our nation and move us forward. I have done that. I'm the only candidate in our party with 15 years of executive experience, not just talking about progressive goals, but actually achieving things like the best schools in America, more affordable college, the highest median income of any state in America.

These are the things that people care about and these are the things I'm going to talk about. And within that, voters will draw their own conclusions about ability, about integrity, about trust, and who should lead us forward as a nation.



I think he answered the question just fine.

HEre is a link to the video: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/martin-omalley-on-the-american-electorate/

O’Malley argued that Sanders’s populism will not help him win their party’s coronation next election elleng Aug 2015 #1
Way to change the subject Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #2
I promote O'Malley, I do not attack Sanders. elleng Aug 2015 #4
OK. I don't agree with O'Malley's spin. delrem Aug 2015 #8
We are all/both angry elleng Aug 2015 #9
I see a unity of purpose. Not anger. I see determination. delrem Aug 2015 #12
Yes but also frustration with the status quo. elleng Aug 2015 #47
Um, some of us are "angrily opposed to Clinton" tularetom Aug 2015 #29
Yes, some are. elleng Aug 2015 #50
Slate: State Department Suddenly Finds 18,000 Clinton-Era Emails It Had Said It Didn't Have Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #13
Like the Federal Records Act, FOIA is another toothless law she intentionally avoided with a private leveymg Aug 2015 #26
He is doing a great job of representing the people, iow. That is what a candidate is supposed to do. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #32
That doesn't respond to the OP. nt delrem Aug 2015 #5
Filling in some 'blanks' about Governor O'Malley, elleng Aug 2015 #6
I nominate some of his treads on GDP Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #16
Same goes for many of us. leveymg Aug 2015 #27
Anger and fear are how almost every national Republican in national office today won their job. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #23
There is something to that elleng Aug 2015 #48
“No great nation ever built its foundation on anger,” catnhatnh Aug 2015 #25
I'm kind of splitting hairs here, cat, but was it ANGER, elleng Aug 2015 #49
Third way does not like populism HFRN Aug 2015 #53
Yah, well, I suppose SO. delrem Aug 2015 #3
yawwwwwnnnnnn ericson00 Aug 2015 #7
Goodnight. elleng Aug 2015 #10
Martin O'Not-saddled-with-Hillary's-scandalous past/baggage. delrem Aug 2015 #14
Clinton's past has "baggage" like Obama's past has "baggage:" as in ericson00 Aug 2015 #17
No. You can't equate Hillary's past with Barack's. delrem Aug 2015 #18
Why can't I? ericson00 Aug 2015 #19
Because to do so is dishonest. delrem Aug 2015 #20
You're gonna give real examples of baggage ericson00 Aug 2015 #21
I really don't know what you're on about. delrem Aug 2015 #22
good point. if not for the rw hate, what would the baggage even be for clinton. bill, ya. hillary seabeyond Aug 2015 #38
My problem with Clinton isn't scandal, it's policy. She's a warmonger. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #55
i do not see her as a warmonger. sanders too voted on military action. seabeyond Aug 2015 #67
Whitewater was the watered-down version of BCCI. Filegate was her BCCI billing records she withheld leveymg Aug 2015 #28
Bummer. I am for omalley but bummer he went there. Nt seabeyond Aug 2015 #11
You are not "for omalley". You are for Hillary Rodham Clinton. delrem Aug 2015 #15
i am so damn tired of certain people telling others who they are rooting for..... just foolish seabeyond Aug 2015 #35
seabeyond — Raine1967 Aug 2015 #33
thanks. it was late, on the way to bed and on the iphone. twice. twice.... seabeyond Aug 2015 #36
You are very welcome, Seabeyond. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #39
I'm sure that you have a legitimate question to ask, seabeyond Aug 2015 #37
Yup, it changes the context altogether. eom Raine1967 Aug 2015 #40
YES! elleng Aug 2015 #54
i also like how omalley started when the guy said he wanted to talk about clinton emails seabeyond Aug 2015 #42
Sure did! elleng Aug 2015 #62
Thank you ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #63
It looks like O Malley is ruining his chance to be VP NYCButterfinger Aug 2015 #24
That is all to his credit, assuming HRC gets the nom. He just went up another notch. leveymg Aug 2015 #31
You can't ruin a chance you never had! tritsofme Aug 2015 #34
How lovely that that's how we decide who is best suited for an office. Jester Messiah Aug 2015 #51
O'Malley would bring youth and maybe Pennsylvania Catholics NYCButterfinger Aug 2015 #66
Problem is, those links are misrepresenting what was said. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #56
He is right, email server questions are very legitimate. The problem I see interspersed with those still_one Aug 2015 #30
This entire thread acts like O'Malley has attacked HRC. On every show (MSNBC or not) that O'Malley FSogol Aug 2015 #41
the article and hte op created to make it look like something it wasnt. need the video to see seabeyond Aug 2015 #44
YES! elleng Aug 2015 #52
It's really disheartening to be honest. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #57
Of course it's legitimate. And he needs to start taking swings. This is how it works. TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #43
Finally! A leader in our party admits to this. Distraction? RW hit? RiverLover Aug 2015 #45
except he did not play the rw hit game you think he did. and i say... good for omalley. seabeyond Aug 2015 #46
And good for seab!!! elleng Aug 2015 #61
YOur OP is misleading. Here is a headline: Voters Don’t Want to Hear About Hillary Clinton’s Emails Raine1967 Aug 2015 #58
NO ......... he said that on Sunday's meet the press Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #59
O'Malley is not really concerned about the email story. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #64
I didn't say he didn't or did answer the question just fine Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #65
'And shame on us as a Democratic Party if we don’t step forward and start offering elleng Aug 2015 #60
K&R! Katashi_itto Aug 2015 #68
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»O’Malley: Clinton email s...»Reply #64