Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: O’Malley: Clinton email server questions 'legitimate' [View all]Raine1967
(11,589 posts)64. O'Malley is not really concerned about the email story.
he's been retry constant about that. The Hill is pushing a meme as though he is. I posted this already in this thread and I am going to post it again, because context matters and the source that you posted took it out of context. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=526910
If you can. watch what he said in the interview, it is much more benign than is being portrayed in the OP. Here is a link to the transcript: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12812371
I think he answered the question just fine.
HEre is a link to the video: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/martin-omalley-on-the-american-electorate/
DICKERSON: So, is this funny now, this issue of the e-mails?
O'MALLEY: I think the most important issue is whether or not we still have the ability as a people to make the choices that make wages go up for Americans and make our economy work for all of us.
I'm sure that you have a legitimate question to ask, and Secretary Clinton and her lawyers can answer it. For my part as a candidate, I intend to put out the ideas and the policies that make college more affordable for more people, that expand Social Security, that get wages to go up again for a majority of us who are all working harder, instead of down.
So, that's what I'm going to talk about, John. And I will leave to you ask Secretary Clinton those other questions.
DICKERSON: Well, it's great, because you are doing exactly what her campaign says, which is, the e-mails are not about trust, people don't care about. What they care about is whether or not they trust to you take care of those issues. So, do you agree with that splitting of the way the electorate looks at the e-mail question?
O'MALLEY: I think the electorate actually looks at candidates in a very holistic way.
They ask, which of these candidates has the independence, the proven ability and experience and ideas that will actually serve our nation and move us forward. I have done that. I'm the only candidate in our party with 15 years of executive experience, not just talking about progressive goals, but actually achieving things like the best schools in America, more affordable college, the highest median income of any state in America.
These are the things that people care about and these are the things I'm going to talk about. And within that, voters will draw their own conclusions about ability, about integrity, about trust, and who should lead us forward as a nation.
O'MALLEY: I think the most important issue is whether or not we still have the ability as a people to make the choices that make wages go up for Americans and make our economy work for all of us.
I'm sure that you have a legitimate question to ask, and Secretary Clinton and her lawyers can answer it. For my part as a candidate, I intend to put out the ideas and the policies that make college more affordable for more people, that expand Social Security, that get wages to go up again for a majority of us who are all working harder, instead of down.
So, that's what I'm going to talk about, John. And I will leave to you ask Secretary Clinton those other questions.
DICKERSON: Well, it's great, because you are doing exactly what her campaign says, which is, the e-mails are not about trust, people don't care about. What they care about is whether or not they trust to you take care of those issues. So, do you agree with that splitting of the way the electorate looks at the e-mail question?
O'MALLEY: I think the electorate actually looks at candidates in a very holistic way.
They ask, which of these candidates has the independence, the proven ability and experience and ideas that will actually serve our nation and move us forward. I have done that. I'm the only candidate in our party with 15 years of executive experience, not just talking about progressive goals, but actually achieving things like the best schools in America, more affordable college, the highest median income of any state in America.
These are the things that people care about and these are the things I'm going to talk about. And within that, voters will draw their own conclusions about ability, about integrity, about trust, and who should lead us forward as a nation.
I think he answered the question just fine.
HEre is a link to the video: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/martin-omalley-on-the-american-electorate/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
O’Malley argued that Sanders’s populism will not help him win their party’s coronation next election
elleng
Aug 2015
#1
Slate: State Department Suddenly Finds 18,000 Clinton-Era Emails It Had Said It Didn't Have
Ichingcarpenter
Aug 2015
#13
Like the Federal Records Act, FOIA is another toothless law she intentionally avoided with a private
leveymg
Aug 2015
#26
He is doing a great job of representing the people, iow. That is what a candidate is supposed to do.
sabrina 1
Aug 2015
#32
Anger and fear are how almost every national Republican in national office today won their job.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2015
#23
good point. if not for the rw hate, what would the baggage even be for clinton. bill, ya. hillary
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#38
Whitewater was the watered-down version of BCCI. Filegate was her BCCI billing records she withheld
leveymg
Aug 2015
#28
i am so damn tired of certain people telling others who they are rooting for..... just foolish
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#35
i also like how omalley started when the guy said he wanted to talk about clinton emails
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#42
That is all to his credit, assuming HRC gets the nom. He just went up another notch.
leveymg
Aug 2015
#31
He is right, email server questions are very legitimate. The problem I see interspersed with those
still_one
Aug 2015
#30
This entire thread acts like O'Malley has attacked HRC. On every show (MSNBC or not) that O'Malley
FSogol
Aug 2015
#41
the article and hte op created to make it look like something it wasnt. need the video to see
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#44
Of course it's legitimate. And he needs to start taking swings. This is how it works.
TwilightGardener
Aug 2015
#43
except he did not play the rw hit game you think he did. and i say... good for omalley.
seabeyond
Aug 2015
#46
YOur OP is misleading. Here is a headline: Voters Don’t Want to Hear About Hillary Clinton’s Emails
Raine1967
Aug 2015
#58