2016 Postmortem

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)

32. He is doing a great job of representing the people, iow. That is what a candidate is supposed to do.

Tue Aug 18, 2015, 11:46 AM

Aug 2015

And the candidate who best represents the people, will get their support. Which is why Sanders is now in a place where the experts predicted he would never be.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

O’Malley: Clinton email server questions 'legitimate' [View all] Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 OP

O’Malley argued that Sanders’s populism will not help him win their party’s coronation next election elleng Aug 2015 #1

Way to change the subject Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #2

I promote O'Malley, I do not attack Sanders. elleng Aug 2015 #4

OK. I don't agree with O'Malley's spin. delrem Aug 2015 #8

We are all/both angry elleng Aug 2015 #9

I see a unity of purpose. Not anger. I see determination. delrem Aug 2015 #12

Yes but also frustration with the status quo. elleng Aug 2015 #47

Um, some of us are "angrily opposed to Clinton" tularetom Aug 2015 #29

Yes, some are. elleng Aug 2015 #50

Slate: State Department Suddenly Finds 18,000 Clinton-Era Emails It Had Said It Didn't Have Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #13

Like the Federal Records Act, FOIA is another toothless law she intentionally avoided with a private leveymg Aug 2015 #26

He is doing a great job of representing the people, iow. That is what a candidate is supposed to do. sabrina 1 Aug 2015 #32

That doesn't respond to the OP. nt delrem Aug 2015 #5

Filling in some 'blanks' about Governor O'Malley, elleng Aug 2015 #6

I nominate some of his treads on GDP Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #16

Same goes for many of us. leveymg Aug 2015 #27

Anger and fear are how almost every national Republican in national office today won their job. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #23

There is something to that elleng Aug 2015 #48

“No great nation ever built its foundation on anger,” catnhatnh Aug 2015 #25

I'm kind of splitting hairs here, cat, but was it ANGER, elleng Aug 2015 #49

Third way does not like populism HFRN Aug 2015 #53

Yah, well, I suppose SO. delrem Aug 2015 #3

yawwwwwnnnnnn ericson00 Aug 2015 #7

Goodnight. elleng Aug 2015 #10

Martin O'Not-saddled-with-Hillary's-scandalous past/baggage. delrem Aug 2015 #14

Clinton's past has "baggage" like Obama's past has "baggage:" as in ericson00 Aug 2015 #17

No. You can't equate Hillary's past with Barack's. delrem Aug 2015 #18

Why can't I? ericson00 Aug 2015 #19

Because to do so is dishonest. delrem Aug 2015 #20

You're gonna give real examples of baggage ericson00 Aug 2015 #21

I really don't know what you're on about. delrem Aug 2015 #22

good point. if not for the rw hate, what would the baggage even be for clinton. bill, ya. hillary seabeyond Aug 2015 #38

My problem with Clinton isn't scandal, it's policy. She's a warmonger. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #55

i do not see her as a warmonger. sanders too voted on military action. seabeyond Aug 2015 #67

Whitewater was the watered-down version of BCCI. Filegate was her BCCI billing records she withheld leveymg Aug 2015 #28

Bummer. I am for omalley but bummer he went there. Nt seabeyond Aug 2015 #11

You are not "for omalley". You are for Hillary Rodham Clinton. delrem Aug 2015 #15

i am so damn tired of certain people telling others who they are rooting for..... just foolish seabeyond Aug 2015 #35

seabeyond — Raine1967 Aug 2015 #33

thanks. it was late, on the way to bed and on the iphone. twice. twice.... seabeyond Aug 2015 #36

You are very welcome, Seabeyond. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #39

I'm sure that you have a legitimate question to ask, seabeyond Aug 2015 #37

Yup, it changes the context altogether. eom Raine1967 Aug 2015 #40

YES! elleng Aug 2015 #54

i also like how omalley started when the guy said he wanted to talk about clinton emails seabeyond Aug 2015 #42

Sure did! elleng Aug 2015 #62

Thank you ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #63

It looks like O Malley is ruining his chance to be VP NYCButterfinger Aug 2015 #24

That is all to his credit, assuming HRC gets the nom. He just went up another notch. leveymg Aug 2015 #31

You can't ruin a chance you never had! tritsofme Aug 2015 #34

How lovely that that's how we decide who is best suited for an office. Jester Messiah Aug 2015 #51

O'Malley would bring youth and maybe Pennsylvania Catholics NYCButterfinger Aug 2015 #66

Problem is, those links are misrepresenting what was said. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #56

He is right, email server questions are very legitimate. The problem I see interspersed with those still_one Aug 2015 #30

This entire thread acts like O'Malley has attacked HRC. On every show (MSNBC or not) that O'Malley FSogol Aug 2015 #41

the article and hte op created to make it look like something it wasnt. need the video to see seabeyond Aug 2015 #44

YES! elleng Aug 2015 #52

It's really disheartening to be honest. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #57

Of course it's legitimate. And he needs to start taking swings. This is how it works. TwilightGardener Aug 2015 #43

Finally! A leader in our party admits to this. Distraction? RW hit? RiverLover Aug 2015 #45

except he did not play the rw hit game you think he did. and i say... good for omalley. seabeyond Aug 2015 #46

And good for seab!!! elleng Aug 2015 #61

YOur OP is misleading. Here is a headline: Voters Don’t Want to Hear About Hillary Clinton’s Emails Raine1967 Aug 2015 #58

NO ......... he said that on Sunday's meet the press Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #59

O'Malley is not really concerned about the email story. Raine1967 Aug 2015 #64

I didn't say he didn't or did answer the question just fine Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 #65

'And shame on us as a Democratic Party if we don’t step forward and start offering elleng Aug 2015 #60

K&R! Katashi_itto Aug 2015 #68