What's with all this ganging up on one member of DU? (Reply #125)

In the discussion thread: please just stop it. [View all]

Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:36 PM

125. What's with all this ganging up on one member of DU?

Like pack dogs on a blood trail. the edginess on one primary candidate's side has become much more apparent as time progresses.

it's definitely a form of bullying.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

164 replies	Author	Time	Post
please just stop it. [View all]	cali	Aug 2015	OP
Who is saying her campaign is trying to sabotage Bernie using BLM?	Fearless	Aug 2015	#1
A segment of the DU population.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#3
nah, it's not a good portion of du.	cali	Aug 2015	#4
I edited.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#6
thanks.	cali	Aug 2015	#9
could have fooled me.....	BooScout	Aug 2015	#8
you're evidently easily fooled.	cali	Aug 2015	#10
Naaaaaaa	BooScout	Aug 2015	#16
Numbers of recs and posts. That is about as reliable as political polls this early in the season.	jwirr	Aug 2015	#100
not really	Duckhunter935	Aug 2015	#5
Because she hasn't appeared at any public events?	Fuddnik	Aug 2015	#60
How they don't get that is beyond me. Nt	NCTraveler	Aug 2015	#102
and 'they', being another form of 'them'	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#121
Sorry. Don't get what you are saying.	NCTraveler	Aug 2015	#122
is that because the Public	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#119
HRH diligently and studiously avoids mingling with the peasantry.	hifiguy	Aug 2015	#149
All across Social Media Hillary IS being blamed so rightly or wrongly	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#12
And there we have it.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#13
Yes, the reality of what these protests have done. I thought I was pretty clear	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#17
I wonder if people actually read the stuff they write? n/t	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#18
They don't.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#20
Facts are facts. No one should ever have supported these tactics from the beginning.	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#25
The "facts"? ... Okay. n/t	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#31
Uh huh	zappaman	Aug 2015	#50
Well at least you're honest about it!	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#153
Honesty.	zappaman	Aug 2015	#154
Normally I would ask for proof of that 'stuff' you just made up.	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#156
Pure speculation, innuendo and personal opinion are now "facts", did you not get the memo from Fox?	Fred Sanders	Aug 2015	#64
I remember a time when DU used to laugh at such crap ...	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#70
I am still laughing! And not worrying much about the nonsensical rantings, there are a few folks like you keeping it real.	Fred Sanders	Aug 2015	#73
LOL. n/t	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#76
What's with all this ganging up on one member of DU?	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#125
People who tell inconvenient truths that contradict the groupthink	hifiguy	Aug 2015	#151
Looks so to be the Case	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#160
What did she say that wasn't factual?	Fawke Em	Aug 2015	#110
Okay. n/t	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#113
Can't see Hill getting tangled up in the middle of a half baked internet	oasis	Aug 2015	#46
She probably isn't tangled up in it. That's what political operatives are for.	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#49
If this incident is presented to her by the media, then and only	oasis	Aug 2015	#54
"many people" I've seen you speak for the American people before.	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#63
Are you speaking for the American people now?	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#81
"deny that reality" You just can't help yourself.	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#93
Well said.	zappaman	Aug 2015	#101
For Pete's sake, Sabrina did not say that it's true that	Fawke Em	Aug 2015	#117
Please. She's all over this thread saying that Clinton is responsible.	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#120
Actually she did say that	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#124
Why?	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#128
lol, what?? What "other side" are you talking about??	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#132
I'm pretty sure you are doing your part to promote that perception on social media	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#106
And I think you believe a conspiracy theory.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#92
Couldn't POSSIBLY have anything to do with comments like these...!!!	MADem	Aug 2015	#118
Your biased interpretations of what you read on social media aren't facts.	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#59
I can clearly remember a day in June 1968, so no, not just image.	irisblue	Aug 2015	#79
So BLM protestors are now armed assassins?	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#96
I did not write that, I did not say that. You are in error if that's what you think	irisblue	Aug 2015	#103
Of course you implied it.	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#109
Let's put two and two together:	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#112
If you want to talk about ME this probably isn't the place. I prefer to stick to	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#146
Your (mis)interpretations are not "facts." That is the point, and when	R B Garr	Aug 2015	#148
Good grief.	Skidmore	Aug 2015	#126
and I agree. This whole issue, if not a tactic by	bbgrunt	Aug 2015	#144
So do I. I have a quote from you about heckling as a tactic and the gay people who used it:	Bluenorthwest	Aug 2015	#57
I have evolved. n/t	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#71
of course you have	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#82
As apparently many formerly strident critics haved. And what I say to them I say to you, which is	Bluenorthwest	Aug 2015	#135
OUCH! That's gonna leave a mark. Seems this "evolution" thing is like a "Free Pass" on any issue....	Indepatriot	Aug 2015	#114
Wrongly so...you blame Hillary	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#15
I thought it was hilarious that you and others were making demands of Sen. Sanders	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#21
Sad that you attempt to make me responsible for other's statements....	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#28
I mostly agree with this.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#42
The poster evidently believes that is how you define "fact"	zappaman	Aug 2015	#43
Well...	Dr Hobbitstein	Aug 2015	#62
Living in ones own world can be fun	zappaman	Aug 2015	#83
Well, if you say so. Nice button, enjoy that world, though frankly I would	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#90
Sneering bullies are generally not happy people.	Vattel	Aug 2015	#162
Thank you, and I agree, about how unhappy sneering bullies are.	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#164
The poster said "Hillary gets the blame. Sorry" By 8 o'clock last night anyone who was watching	jwirr	Aug 2015	#108
Thank you, stating a fact creates quite stir it seems. Bernie Sanders defended Hillary	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#155
"take credit for your own statement instead of deflecting? " I read that as defecating, lol.	bettyellen	Aug 2015	#158
That too lol	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#159
It broke the tension of this thread for me, ha ha	bettyellen	Aug 2015	#161
Why should her campaign say they're NOT involved?	George II	Aug 2015	#38
Because her campaign and surrogates	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#45
Thank you for your reasoned and accurate assessment.	Fawke Em	Aug 2015	#97
Thank you, that is exactly what people are saying. Wnen something makes no sense	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#98
So it must be Hillary and not a Republican?	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#123
And I am with you on that.	zeemike	Aug 2015	#116
I LOVE this post	hifiguy	Aug 2015	#150
I didn't bookmark or copy/paste them, but...	George II	Aug 2015	#26
Have you actually read this forum this morning? nt	Adrahil	Aug 2015	#27
Here is one of the more blatantly obvious ones....	George II	Aug 2015	#33
Here is another one:	George II	Aug 2015	#40
Mostly twitter and facebook. They went wild last night.	jwirr	Aug 2015	#99
Kick.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#2
"absolutely isn't behind this"	aspirant	Aug 2015	#139
Not my job.	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#141
Then demanding Proof from anyone else	aspirant	Aug 2015	#142
Yah I wasn't making demands...	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#143
The proof is in the abosute lack of evidence.	NCTraveler	Aug 2015	#157
No one is ever obligated to do the right thing. That's why it's a matter of -honor-	HereSince1628	Aug 2015	#7
Nailed it	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#133
Regardless, it's a campaign tactic. We are in the middle of a campaign. As to her connection to	GoneFishin	Aug 2015	#11
And it could also be someone else that is hoping for a twofer. What better way could you use to	A Simple Game	Aug 2015	#41
Lack of proof is no proof of no connection?!? Argue from ignorance much....?	Moonwalk	Aug 2015	#87
I was not the one who asserted that there was not a connection. No. And you ... ?	GoneFishin	Aug 2015	#91
Stop what?? Thinking for ourselves? YOU are entitled to YOUR opinion.	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#14
Because this division isn't good for the party...	Agschmid	Aug 2015	#23
Yes, from the beginning ti was intended to divide the party. And people here	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#29
This "division" is not within our party. BLM is not a Democratic Party-affiliated group. Please	Hortensis	Aug 2015	#39
"Good Democrats, lifelong Democrats"	Dr Hobbitstein	Aug 2015	#66
Stalking again?	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#74
Nope, reading a thread	Dr Hobbitstein	Aug 2015	#78
More stalking behavior, which has gone on for a very long time now.	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#84
Keep playing the victim, Sabrina.	Dr Hobbitstein	Aug 2015	#89
And why not?	zappaman	Aug 2015	#94
Ha!	Dr Hobbitstein	Aug 2015	#104
And when you're not good at something?	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#115
I will repeat this as politely as I can, I support the Labeling of our Food and I oppose	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#95
Post removed	Post removed	Aug 2015	#107
Again repeating a request that this poster refrain from addressing me, due to	sabrina 1	Aug 2015	#111
Good lord, you are all over DU posting several dozen posts	Sheepshank	Aug 2015	#127
Results of your Jury Service	Purveyor	Aug 2015	#131
Project Much?	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#137
You said 'hypocrisy' first	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#136
Exactly	LittleBlue	Aug 2015	#85
Not Hillary at all.	Lunabell	Aug 2015	#19
+1 ... I agree. n/t	1StrongBlackMan	Aug 2015	#22
that may be a first.	cali	Aug 2015	#24
Is she behind this?	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#30
I agree.	tazkcmo	Aug 2015	#32
This is sheer nonsense.	MoonRiver	Aug 2015	#44
her campaign was the one that began floating	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#48
Total B.S.	MoonRiver	Aug 2015	#55
BLM is not a cohesive organization	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#67
Exactly what evidence do you have of any association?	MoonRiver	Aug 2015	#130
Did you read my post?	tazkcmo	Aug 2015	#51
Sorry, I think I responded to the wrong post.	MoonRiver	Aug 2015	#61
That makes sense.	tazkcmo	Aug 2015	#65
Same here. :-)	MoonRiver	Aug 2015	#69
This message was self-deleted by its author	Alkene	Aug 2015	#34
Which is why it is simpler to take people at their word	jberryhill	Aug 2015	#35
I don't really care any more whether she's directly involved or not	Doctor_J	Aug 2015	#36
"Soros funding of BLM is not evidence."...	DonViejo	Aug 2015	#37
Most people tend not to respond in the best manner when they are insulted. It's human nature.	jalan48	Aug 2015	#47
Sorry	Bobbie Jo	Aug 2015	#52
And you passed it a long time ago	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#53
Keep it up	Bobbie Jo	Aug 2015	#58
Hillary is not behind the Black Lives Matter protests	ibegurpard	Aug 2015	#75
See...	Bobbie Jo	Aug 2015	#86
and here we thought	Marty McGraw	Aug 2015	#138
Who the hell	Bobbie Jo	Aug 2015	#140
Nixon didn't have clue on who Donald Segretti was	Ichingcarpenter	Aug 2015	#56
If Hillary gains anything from Bernie's engagement with BLM, it should be that she learns	ancianita	Aug 2015	#68
Problem with BLM	Zoonart	Aug 2015	#72
I'd like to draw a parallel that some may find annoying	starroute	Aug 2015	#77
I like that.	bbgrunt	Aug 2015	#145
I'd hate to have you working against me!	Babel_17	Aug 2015	#147
I agree Cali.	jalan48	Aug 2015	#80
I Smell A Rat	Yallow	Aug 2015	#88
Nice straw man you have there.	EEO	Aug 2015	#105
Sanders is about to be sunk by SJWs	Prism	Aug 2015	#129
a lot of the suspicion is also from the similar language to the Clinton side: if you're not	MisterP	Aug 2015	#134
Marissa Jenae does tweet under #BowDownBernie how is that less offensive than the one you mention?	peacebird	Aug 2015	#152
I agree, but I would add	Vattel	Aug 2015	#163

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.