2016 Postmortem

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)

51. You're seriously avoiding the point.

Reply to MADem (Reply #23)

Sat Aug 1, 2015, 04:03 PM

Aug 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

157 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Memo to Bernie Sanders supporters [View all] Cali_Democrat Aug 2015 OP

But. NCTraveler Aug 2015 #1

Or, you could do more research and find they have strong positions against police violence, against villager Aug 2015 #2

You're seriously defending Rand Paul....? MADem Aug 2015 #6

You don't know how to respond to anything actually posted, do you? villager Aug 2015 #7

You're seriously defending Rand Paul? MADem Aug 2015 #23

You're seriously avoiding the point. Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #51

I asked the question. Haven't gotten an answer. I can only conclude that the answer is MADem Aug 2015 #53

That poster should be a Hillary adviser daybranch Aug 2015 #75

Who's "avoiding issues?" Go back and read the OP, and ask yourself why you're MADem Aug 2015 #110

You are avoiding issues. I'm quite 840high Aug 2015 #127

The only time you ever speak to me, you are making some sort of accusation, just like that one. MADem Aug 2015 #136

Correct. I find we are politically worlds apart. 840high Aug 2015 #144

That's nice. nt MADem Aug 2015 #145

Actually you're excellent at being right on point.. thank you. Cha Aug 2015 #134

Anytime! MADem Aug 2015 #135

No problem. they can't debate you so they insult you.. kinda like this other OP Cha Aug 2015 #137

That OP speaks the absolute truth. MADem Aug 2015 #138

Of course they're sneaky enough to do that.. It's called "ratfucking" but so sad for them. Cha Aug 2015 #139

Speaking of "ratfucking" why did you rec these threads, cha?: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #141

You don't really know what the term "ratfucking" VanillaRhapsody Aug 2015 #148

Yes indeed: "when you lie down with pigs" kfreed Oct 2015 #154

Or you use Bernie to attack Democrats if you're not an actual supporter kfreed Oct 2015 #153

Are you FOR white supremacy? kfreed Oct 2015 #152

Goodman is a BAAAAD reference!! Unless one wants to make an "association," that is. MADem Aug 2015 #3

Somebody sounds a little tired of defending the indefensible Android3.14 Aug 2015 #4

That's why none of them ever discuss, and why their tactics are increasingly indistinguishable villager Aug 2015 #5

Yeah, like the Rand Paul supporter who wrote the laudatory article, mentioned in the OP...?? MADem Aug 2015 #25

How about the Hillary supporter who linked to Stormfront: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #114

This isn't "Who Wore It Best" you know....! MADem Aug 2015 #116

Wait, didn't you bring up questionable behaviour by supporters first? beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #117

You think Mr. Goodman is a Sanders supporter? He's the supporter at issue, here. MADem Aug 2015 #118

No, I'm calling out hypocrisy. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #121

No, you're not. The objection here is to Mr. Goodman. In response, you're calling out DUers. nt MADem Aug 2015 #123

The people known to visit Stormfront are Paulites kfreed Oct 2015 #156

Like this artislife Aug 2015 #67

Results... Major Nikon Aug 2015 #106

Add the gun control bills voted against. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #8

Guns kill 33,000 people per year. JaneyVee Aug 2015 #11

And yet one little war can kill so many more! artislife Aug 2015 #22

Do the math. That's 33,000 per year, and counting. JaneyVee Aug 2015 #24

How sad that that's all you got. H. Clinton turned on Democrats and gave her support to George Bush rhett o rick Aug 2015 #130

A million innocent Iraqis were killed kfreed Oct 2015 #155

Blaming Ralph Nader for the loss of life in Iraq is way absurd. That's taking rhett o rick Oct 2015 #157

Shouldn't vote to FUND those little wars, then--should one? MADem Aug 2015 #27

Scramble! artislife Aug 2015 #32

Bernie voted for gun control and has been given an F rating by the NRA beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #93

Loves TPP? Prove it. Post that declarative statement! MADem Aug 2015 #15

Loves H-1b guest worker visas and tech outsourcing, too HFRN Aug 2015 #64

+1 LWolf Aug 2015 #151

LOL BooScout Aug 2015 #9

Yeah, this went to a jury, amazingly Godhumor Aug 2015 #10

Nothing ceases to amaze me around here anymore.... BooScout Aug 2015 #16

Amazing that the one "hide" threw in an opinion on the topic, too....neutral? Nah! George II Aug 2015 #17

Hmmmm. Ain't that peculiar...not! MADem Aug 2015 #19

That was a terrible rationale for a hide vote. Not liking a post is not a reason to hide folks. TheKentuckian Aug 2015 #119

Were that the case I'd be voting HIDE on most every jury I get! MADem Aug 2015 #122

I'm agreeing for once, I responded to your post to echo it. TheKentuckian Aug 2015 #150

You should send this to the admins. zappaman Aug 2015 #31

I guess we can't all live up to your high standards. n/t winter is coming Aug 2015 #12

Thank you for your concern. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #13

Better yet HassleCat Aug 2015 #14

That's very good advice, I think. MADem Aug 2015 #21

+1. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #59

By supporting Keystone, fracking, mandatory sentencing, three strike laws, taking money from CCA,... marble falls Aug 2015 #71

Yes, Bernie himself has never attacked Clinton nxylas Aug 2015 #48

skim through this thread passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #62

Oh, I know they do nxylas Aug 2015 #95

did or did she not back "getting tough" and welfare "reform" and other 90s racial horrors? MisterP Aug 2015 #18

Memo to H supporters artislife Aug 2015 #20

"we" Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #26

That is such a strange reply... artislife Aug 2015 #28

Is it? Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #33

Very weird. And very strange. artislife Aug 2015 #34

Yeah, you said that already. Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #37

I remember the 'is that a mouse in your pocket' retort to a singular claiming to be a plural. freshwest Aug 2015 #54

Yes! Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #63

Is "we" you and MADem Aug 2015 #35

Silly people artislife Aug 2015 #36

Rand Paul supporters are an "acceptable source" to you? Reeeaaaaallllly? MADem Aug 2015 #43

OMGawd!!!! In addition to the obvious RWNJ dog whistles... freshwest Aug 2015 #80

HC supporters linking to rw websites and posting articles from banned disruptors: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #85

That one has a link to a well known republican site which is at the least is a hidable offense. L0oniX Aug 2015 #104

Yep and they doubled down when called on it. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #107

The admins should do something about that one. My bet is that they won't. L0oniX Aug 2015 #108

skinner said: "We Hillary supporters need to be better than everyone else." beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #109

That'll be the day. L0oniX Aug 2015 #111

Who is "that one?" MADem Aug 2015 #120

Maybe you should check the link before making demands. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #124

No--the collars and cuffs aren't matching, here. MADem Aug 2015 #125

I posted two links, if they're not to your posts move on. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #126

You can't answer my question--it wasn't directed at you, yet you inserted yourself in the subthread. MADem Aug 2015 #143

...and of course, this post is "out of context" Sancho Aug 2015 #149

We tend to not like right wing sources ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #49

Not looking for your permission. artislife Aug 2015 #66

Not giving you any ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #115

Except you do: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #86

Alrighty then... BooScout Aug 2015 #44

Y.A.W.FUCKING.N. cherokeeprogressive Aug 2015 #29

Right wing sources were always murielm99 Aug 2015 #30

So many new posters lately Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #38

Except when Hillary supporters use them and then it gets a pass: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #84

I wouldn't be able to say that she had nice shoes... SoapBox Aug 2015 #39

Okey dokey ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #42

At least she is an actual Democrat...not a pseudo one.... VanillaRhapsody Aug 2015 #97

I applaud your naivete Android3.14 Aug 2015 #113

!!!! ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #40

An ad homenium response. Fearless Aug 2015 #41

Check the TOS. nt MADem Aug 2015 #45

What about the Terms of Service? Fearless Aug 2015 #47

The salient excerpt is at post 43. A full read of the TOS is always a good idea, every so often. nt MADem Aug 2015 #52

lame Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #74

The TOS is lame, huh? I don't think so. nt MADem Aug 2015 #82

I know the Terms of Service well Fearless Aug 2015 #140

I am applying them to those who would use Mr. "I Support Rand Paul" Goodman as a source, here. MADem Aug 2015 #142

Hillary is a weak opponent. Fearless Aug 2015 #146

No, it's a TOS violation to use wingnutty sources here at DU. nt MADem Aug 2015 #147

That was a pretty stupid thing to post Motown_Johnny Aug 2015 #46

DU has literally zero influence on Bernie's campaign. cyberswede Aug 2015 #50

But people who support Rand Paul 2016 apparently do! nt MADem Aug 2015 #56

Huh? cyberswede Aug 2015 #61

Read the OP. Click on the links. That's what this thread is about. nt MADem Aug 2015 #69

I read the OP. I even quoted it. cyberswede Aug 2015 #89

It does matter what a Paulbot fronting like he cares about Sanders posts in HUFFPO, though. nt MADem Aug 2015 #90

And Hillary supporters on DU link to rw websites and post articles from banned disruptors. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #88

You should start an OP on that topic! MADem Aug 2015 #91

'Never ascribe to deviousness and mendacity' unless it's a GOP/Koch/Libertarian. It's their policy! freshwest Aug 2015 #96

What makes me "puke my guts out" is swift boating good Dem candidates on DU. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #98

Something awful? Do tell! MADem Aug 2015 #105

There used to be a joke webstie named that. But it sure seems they have the game down. freshwest Aug 2015 #112

Cali, Mrs. Clinton is her own worst enemy. saidsimplesimon Aug 2015 #55

The complaint department is on the 13th floor. L0oniX Aug 2015 #57

It was moved downstairs. AtomicKitten Aug 2015 #99

H. A. Goodman may be a Rand Paul supporter passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #58

No--he wants the race to be Sanders v. Paul, because he thinks Paul can win against Sanders. MADem Aug 2015 #70

I'm not defending Goodman here passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #72

Goodman is a "liberal Dem" who supports Rand Paul for the Presidency. He wrote an article declaring MADem Aug 2015 #81

Why are you addressing this to me? passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #83

The OP says "Memo to Bernie Supporters" and it references this post.... MADem Aug 2015 #87

Sorry, I didn't realize I was referring to the LINK to the Goodman article passiveporcupine Aug 2015 #92

Well, that would perhaps suggest that Goodman (who is the subject of the thread) is a plagiarist, MADem Aug 2015 #94

But you are okay with Rand Paul when he attacks Bernie, right? bluedigger Aug 2015 #60

Good find. 840high Aug 2015 #133

There is no need.... V0ltairesGh0st Aug 2015 #65

I found this, marble falls Aug 2015 #68

Memo to Hillary supporters: Posting a hit piece from a banned disruptor isn't smart or cool: beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #73

It is only a one way memo stream! artislife Aug 2015 #76

Nothing like a lethal dose of hypocrisy to go with the daily poutrage. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #77

Unfortunately that one isn't banned ...yet. L0oniX Aug 2015 #101

They were one hide away from a vacation after that second thread. beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #103

Hark! Sanders supporters artislife Aug 2015 #78

My legs are trembling or 840high Aug 2015 #128

Heh! nt artislife Aug 2015 #131

You're hurting your candidate's chances says the Hillary supporter to the Bernie supporter. Ed Suspicious Aug 2015 #79

They think that the real progressives don't know we'll be thrown under the bus again. L0oniX Aug 2015 #100

Not all of us have gone off the rails completely... Agschmid Aug 2015 #102

I am sure you don't even recognize how silly that is. If Rand Paul says rhett o rick Aug 2015 #129

...^ that 840high Aug 2015 #132