Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Dkc05

(375 posts)

9. why should they get 5,000,000 tax free?

Reply to Tx4obama (Original post)

Tue Jan 1, 2013, 10:04 AM

Jan 2013

The should get a 50% tax or more. Rich get richer. The democrat senator is just another rich persons club.
take care of business to the rich friends as they are 1 in the same

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's 'some' of what The Senate bill that passed has in it [Updated] [View all] Tx4obama Jan 2013 OP

Okay, have not read enough about the deal but this is a decent deal UCmeNdc Jan 2013 #1

Ending the 2% payroll tax cut 1KansasDem Jan 2013 #2

But that tax cut was never supposed to be permanent. Tx4obama Jan 2013 #4

Put in that way, Delphinus Jan 2013 #10

And there isn't any question on where the money for Social Security comes from. LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #16

Yes, with the economy struggling there should have been more negotiating wisteria Jan 2013 #14

So far, so good, but I will not be happy until I know what will be cut in the next round. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #3

K&R... thanks for all your postings! Cha Jan 2013 #5

Thanks for the comprehensive update davidpdx Jan 2013 #6

I hope the do. wisteria Jan 2013 #15

Lowers Corporate Tax Rate More and Made Permanent. boingboinh Jan 2013 #7

This is the kind of deal that is proportionate to the cards he was holding Cosmocat Jan 2013 #8

why should they get 5,000,000 tax free? Dkc05 Jan 2013 #9

What makes you think rich people pay estate tax? jeff47 Jan 2013 #13

Your OP uses the word "permanent" at least three times. former9thward Jan 2013 #11

Yes, that word annoys me too. bemildred Jan 2013 #12

The difference is that it requires direct action by Congress to change it again. LiberalFighter Jan 2013 #17