Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Tagg Romney: Mitt had “no desire” to run [View all]JHB
(37,153 posts)21. He has that "I'm a CEO! What do you mean I have to APPLY for a job?" attitude.
The article stressed how much the family wanted to stress "what kind of person he was" through anecdotes about people he helped.
But that also shows the disconnect: there are relatively few "warped frustrated old men" of the Mr. Potter/Ebeneezer Scrooge vein who are uniformly sour. Most people can find it in themselves to be kind to individuals.
The key is when that gets abstracted a level and one starts thinking of groups. At that level, how freely do your prejudices flow? Romney put his on display in the 47% video, and has followed up showing it in his post-election excuse-making about "gifts".
So Romney proposed months of intense preparation, with 16 mock debates. (Obama did 11.) Then, just as Romney seemed ready, the campaign received news that a video had been leaked in which the candidate characterized 47 percent of Americans as victims who wanted government benefits and would never vote for him. That left the impression that Romney was referring not just to people on welfare but also to recipients of Social Security and veterans benefits. It seemed to confirm the worst view of Romney, that he didnt care about average people. His poll numbers plummeted
Yeah, it left that impression... because to hit that 47% number, you are talking about Social Security recipients and veterans. And people on unemployment for economic reasons that Mitt only had experience in exacerbating, not counterbalancing. And people who do work at a job (or jobs) using Republican-supported tax credits, so that the income tax liability on their low-paying jobs is zero.
People noticed that it was the most honest he'd been in the entire campaign. The rest was all "Who let the dogs out". Months and months of it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republicans don't like voters and don't want to talk to them because Republican
JDPriestly
Dec 2012
#8
exactly!! d'oh -- but it shouldn't surprise us. The Republicans generally seem to have a
Voice for Peace
Dec 2012
#28
Gee, don't all of us spend nearly all our time for 8 years working for things we don't want?
karynnj
Dec 2012
#6
interesting point, maybe in their secret meetups they believed Mitt was the chosen one.
Sunlei
Dec 2012
#14
Not to mention all the personal money he spent. IIRC, the first time around it was like $50 million,
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2012
#37
Damn, these reporters/folks just don't get it. Ignore the substance...it's all about form!!!
Malikshah
Dec 2012
#32