Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(37,153 posts)
21. He has that "I'm a CEO! What do you mean I have to APPLY for a job?" attitude.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:24 PM
Dec 2012

The article stressed how much the family wanted to stress "what kind of person he was" through anecdotes about people he helped.

But that also shows the disconnect: there are relatively few "warped frustrated old men" of the Mr. Potter/Ebeneezer Scrooge vein who are uniformly sour. Most people can find it in themselves to be kind to individuals.

The key is when that gets abstracted a level and one starts thinking of groups. At that level, how freely do your prejudices flow? Romney put his on display in the 47% video, and has followed up showing it in his post-election excuse-making about "gifts".

So Romney proposed months of intense preparation, with 16 mock debates. (Obama did 11.) Then, just as Romney seemed ready, the campaign ­received news that a video had been leaked in which the candidate characterized 47 percent of Americans as “victims” who wanted government benefits and would never vote for him. That left the impression that Romney was referring not just to people on welfare but also to recipients of Social Security and veterans benefits. It seemed to confirm the worst view of ­Romney, that he didn’t care about average people. His poll numbers plummeted

Yeah, it left that impression... because to hit that 47% number, you are talking about Social Security recipients and veterans. And people on unemployment for economic reasons that Mitt only had experience in exacerbating, not counterbalancing. And people who do work at a job (or jobs) using Republican-supported tax credits, so that the income tax liability on their low-paying jobs is zero.

People noticed that it was the most honest he'd been in the entire campaign. The rest was all "Who let the dogs out". Months and months of it.

{{{{shaking head}}}} ywcachieve Dec 2012 #1
He is re-writing history Evergreen Emerald Dec 2012 #2
yep. Liberal_in_LA Dec 2012 #34
So he ran twice...This is not the way to save face...LOL.. monmouth3 Dec 2012 #3
Well, that's the romneys for ya.. always doing the wrong Cha Dec 2012 #24
No retroactive reverse engineering will give them a clue either lunatica Dec 2012 #4
What a revolutionary concept for an election! DFW Dec 2012 #5
Republicans don't like voters and don't want to talk to them because Republican JDPriestly Dec 2012 #8
It's the vast left wing conspiracy.... Wounded Bear Dec 2012 #17
exactly!! d'oh -- but it shouldn't surprise us. The Republicans generally seem to have a Voice for Peace Dec 2012 #28
Gee, don't all of us spend nearly all our time for 8 years working for things we don't want? karynnj Dec 2012 #6
The Romneys cannot stop Cha Dec 2012 #25
Zing!!! dimbear Dec 2012 #30
We have to thank republicans for that lame primary. Sunlei Dec 2012 #7
He might be right. Rozlee Dec 2012 #9
I disagree. I think the LDS CHURCH wanted Rmoney to win the presidency kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #12
Huh. Rozlee Dec 2012 #13
interesting point, maybe in their secret meetups they believed Mitt was the chosen one. Sunlei Dec 2012 #14
Thus the real takeaway from this election: NYC Liberal Dec 2012 #10
+ 1000! NICO9000 Dec 2012 #19
I have no desire for him to run either. Auntie Bush Dec 2012 #11
He just wanted a coronation, not an actual contest. Motown_Johnny Dec 2012 #15
He has that "I'm a CEO! What do you mean I have to APPLY for a job?" attitude. JHB Dec 2012 #21
Lets hope tagg and the rest of the romney's feel that way LynneSin Dec 2012 #16
Sour grapes Mz Pip Dec 2012 #18
But he was the White Horse!!! backscatter712 Dec 2012 #20
Romney is retroactively NOT running for president... Jeff In Milwaukee Dec 2012 #22
Oh, that definitely earns a +1 JHB Dec 2012 #23
Got it.. Cha Dec 2012 #26
I beat you to it..... Fresh_Start Dec 2012 #31
Looks like little Tagg has Daddy's gift for lying rurallib Dec 2012 #27
How could someone Third Doctor Dec 2012 #29
That is it in nutshell Cosmocat Dec 2012 #33
Not to mention all the personal money he spent. IIRC, the first time around it was like $50 million, Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #37
Damn, these reporters/folks just don't get it. Ignore the substance...it's all about form!!! Malikshah Dec 2012 #32
I'm guessing he was made to say this Superbot Dec 2012 #35
Is it sour grapes, or MurrayDelph Dec 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Tagg Romney: Mitt had “no...»Reply #21