Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why Bush v. Gore might mean that Clinton should be president: The EP argument against winner-take-al [View all]JudyM
(29,526 posts)23. The concept is for the Supremes to invalidate winner-take-all across the country to comply with E.P.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why Bush v. Gore might mean that Clinton should be president: The EP argument against winner-take-al [View all]
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
OP
Here's a thread about #1p1vote and urgent calls to action to protect our democracy
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#1
Here are numbers to AGs of states we need to call today to demand they enforce the Equal Protection
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#4
Winner take all for state electoral votes is NOT in US constitution. Enforce Equal Protection Clause
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#5
Start making the phone calls. We need just one state AG to take to supreme court, but the more AG's
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#9
Attorney General Phone numbers. Call! We just need one to take to Supreme Court
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#19
The concept is for the Supremes to invalidate winner-take-all across the country to comply with E.P.
JudyM
Dec 2016
#23
That's one way to look at it. Another is that that's right as long as it does not infringe on on
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#25
In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court ruled states don't have the power to recount
Eric J in MN
Dec 2016
#35
Called AG Beemer's office, spoke to H and she put me on with her supervisor, E.
Mc Mike
Dec 2016
#30
I could not gleam from this article how rounding can properly divide a state's EC vote count
Stargleamer
Dec 2016
#27
The Electors Trust provides free and strictly confidential legal support to any Elector who wishes t
Madam45for2923
Dec 2016
#34
Considering that some red state electors are saying that they won't vote for Trump
Thor_MN
Dec 2016
#36