Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Bernie Sanders would have beaten Trump. Period. [View all]
Another poster here in DU is arguing Sanders would have lost.
Evidence: arguments that begin with "it woulda been like" and outright assertions that "socialism is still unpopular in America"
In other words... no evidence. Just speculation without fact.
I'm arguing Sanders would have won.
Empirical date: actual polls showing Sanders winning decisively against Trump.
Sanders beat Trump by 10 points among independencts and would have taken the overall electorate 56-44 in a two way race.
Some people will argue that polls were inaccurate this year. But that's only true of state-by-state polls. Overall polling showed Clinton just slightly ahead of Trump in popular support--when you aggregate all the major national polls--and that is in fact what happened. She'll win the popular vote by about one million votes (better than Gore's margin of victory) or 8/10s of 1%. Trump did a little better, but not much better, than the aggregate of all major polls.
He "overcame" a 2-3% margin, but could not have beat a 12% point margin like Sanders had.
Am I making some assumptions too? Yes, to be honest, I am. But I make far far fewer than those made by people saying Bernie would have lost. The truth is we'll never know with absolute certainty. But any reasonable model will tell you Sanders at the minimum would have flipped those 2-3 razor-close rust belt states that gave Trump his fluke of a minority victory and deprived Clinton of her electoral plurality.
It's tough to write this, because the one thing we do NOT need at DU is a typical liberal circular firing squad. We need to spend our time and effort organizing and putting the word out on how to resist Trump's disastrous policy impulses and the corrupt mob of sycophants and opportunists that he's going to bring in to loot the country.
I won't sit back and let others spread bad info. I will speak up. But I will always be a voice saying we need to look forward and find the soft spots to kick their fascist asses.
241 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Let's not mention the "rigged primary" that cost us a lot of votes because people walked away
MelissaB
Nov 2016
#3
And the polls turned out to be SO accurate this election cycle, didn't they? Give me a fuckin'
beaglelover
Nov 2016
#60
Hillary won the popular vote by enough to make the 4 point lead accurate.
Zen Democrat
Nov 2016
#155
No, by your own metric Trump could never have won. Other than that you have personal
bettyellen
Nov 2016
#102
We don't elect Presidents with national votes. At one point (just before Comey interfered).....
George II
Nov 2016
#184
When it's all said and done, she will have lost by about 40-50 votes. That's not being "crushed".
George II
Nov 2016
#203
I never argued the simply "ham sandwiches" are anti-Semitic. Context is everything!
George II
Nov 2016
#229
"Disapproval" wasn't on the ballot. If it was she would have won by a landslide.
George II
Nov 2016
#199
Nor can you win the nomination "appealing to just the people predisposed to support you".
George II
Nov 2016
#230
You are suggesting we should run and 80 year old socialist candidate against
Demsrule86
Nov 2016
#235
You say he was establishment, but his votes came from people fed up with the system
Bucky
Nov 2016
#178
Don't forget Planned Parenthood!! Anyone working for the common good for years is SHITE!?!?!
bettyellen
Nov 2016
#106
The only regular paychecks Bernie ever got for a sustained period of time were government ones.
MADem
Nov 2016
#115
Yup, and someone posted an article here with the reasons that Sanders was popular:
R B Garr
Nov 2016
#32
we had two very suboptimal candidates. Can you name the last time a Democrat over 60 won?
geek tragedy
Nov 2016
#10
Maybe we need to make it a federal crime for an FBI director to "opine" on open investigations,
MADem
Nov 2016
#129
or, there was a group of likely Trump voters that were much harder to poll than Clinton/Sanders
geek tragedy
Nov 2016
#17
In the spirit of opinion and lessons learned, Warren was our best choice
BeyondGeography
Nov 2016
#18
No kidding. At a minimum polls found 10% of the Sanders supporters would not vote for Hillary
still_one
Nov 2016
#109
Facts, yeah right. Feingold lost, republican incumbents won. She also won the popular vote
still_one
Nov 2016
#211
Yeah, I'd love to be told to get in line or sit down and shut up one more time.
MelissaB
Nov 2016
#163
This discussion board is called "2016 Postmortem". I'm sad if my arguments annoy you.
Bucky
Nov 2016
#188
Dream on. He couldn't even beat Hillary in the primaries (oh, I know, they were
beaglelover
Nov 2016
#59
He would have lost. If the polls were wrong about Hillary, then they were wrong about him.
grossproffit
Nov 2016
#84
if you think universal healthcare (single payer, expanded medicare for all, etc)
Grey Lemercier
Nov 2016
#133
bullshit. Clinton supporters would have supported Sanders if he was the nominee. The
still_one
Nov 2016
#92
Bernie was on the rise when his wings got plucked. He would have kept rural WI, MICH, PA blue.
zonkers
Nov 2016
#97
We "Democrats" chose our nominee, and we "Democrats" will deal with the outcome. Get over it.
Tarheel_Dem
Nov 2016
#99
He would have gotten creamed. Tragically, because I supported Now support him, but he would not
mahina
Nov 2016
#100
Sorry--that's utter nonsense. He couldn't beat Clinton, how could he beat Trump?
MADem
Nov 2016
#101
In order for Sanders to run as the DNC nominee, he did not win in the primaries, he would
Thinkingabout
Nov 2016
#119
But if more candidates had entered and run in the D primary things may have turned out
Ligyron
Nov 2016
#164
It could also be said if more would have entered there would be less votes for Sanders,
Thinkingabout
Nov 2016
#182
I love Bernie too, but if he really is Superman, he would have beaten Hillary in the primaries.
world wide wally
Nov 2016
#137
Gee, Feingold didn't win, nor did those Swing state Senate Democrats against the
still_one
Nov 2016
#200
Hillary supporters would have supported Sanders if he was the nominal. At least 10%, and by
still_one
Nov 2016
#180
Biden would've been amazing, agreed. I disagree that Sanders couldn't have won black voters over
Bucky
Nov 2016
#195
If sanders hadn't run and bad mouthed Hillary...she'd be our president today.
Auntie Bush
Nov 2016
#218