Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I'd raise the retirement age and remove the cap at $106,000. steelmania75 Nov 2012 #1
Don't need to raise the retirement age. nichomachus Nov 2012 #3
Thank You... haikugal Nov 2012 #6
Raising the retirement age would be a bad idea. haikugal Nov 2012 #5
life expectancy is falling for some groups of people. n/t Cobalt Violet Nov 2012 #7
Raising the retirement age is austerity bullshit, it is a cut in benefits. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #12
+1 forestpath Nov 2012 #14
That's what I've been thinking as well. haikugal Nov 2012 #15
Maybe life expectancy is increasing. But not by much. LiberalFighter Nov 2012 #21
The other drawback with raising the retirement age shawn703 Nov 2012 #23
Good point! qwlauren35 Nov 2012 #38
Retirement Age Roy Ellefson Nov 2012 #28
The only thing you need to know nichomachus Nov 2012 #2
Thanks haikugal Nov 2012 #9
The income disparity needs to be readjusted so the rich aren't hogging all the income for themselves LiberalFighter Nov 2012 #22
Reneging on a debt ... GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #4
Oh...I'll use this!! haikugal Nov 2012 #11
On paper SS had trust to cover into 2020s-30s Blue4Texas Nov 2012 #8
If the trust fund is a fiction then so are t-bills. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #10
I tell them to do that often!! haikugal Nov 2012 #16
show them the reagan clip "SS does not add to the deficit) - its on DU somewhere nt msongs Nov 2012 #13
I saw that earlier but didn't watch...I'll look for it. haikugal Nov 2012 #18
Al Gore's suggestion was a lockbox DeeDeeNY Nov 2012 #17
Damn!! That's great...Thanks! haikugal Nov 2012 #19
Remove cap, apply tax to capital gains, problems solved. 5 minutes if Congress were functional. Scuba Nov 2012 #20
Congress John2 Nov 2012 #24
It doesn't add a penny to the debt, as we know Maplegrass Nov 2012 #25
Bullshit. The initial benefits calculation already benefits those of lower income eridani Nov 2012 #34
Kind of hard when their grasp of english is so poor you can't understand them. - and never a link! AAO Nov 2012 #26
They can be very difficult to understand haikugal Nov 2012 #27
Right! AAO Nov 2012 #30
Drawing money from the Trust Fund decreases the debt Kaleva Nov 2012 #29
But it is likely offset by equivalent borrowing so it is net zero. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #35
It isn't quite net zero as the govt. will pay interest on the money it borrows... Kaleva Nov 2012 #36
Anyone remember Al Gore Sophiegirl Nov 2012 #31
From further up in the thread... haikugal Nov 2012 #32
Life expectancy at birth is totally irrelevant. What counts is further life expectancy at age 65. eridani Nov 2012 #33
Life expectency of those who have reached adulthood is relevant. Kaleva Nov 2012 #37
Three or four years is trivial, and 21 is an irrelevant age eridani Nov 2012 #39
But if you start at 60, you are dismissing many of the adults... Kaleva Nov 2012 #40
What makes you think that this isn't happening even now? eridani Nov 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Social Security adds to t...»Reply #14