2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Donations for War on Iran, Tim Canova [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)OK, Tim is to her right on the Iran deal(a moot point, since the agreement is already in place and there is no way for Congress to undo it).
It's one stance, and it's a stance he can't actually do anything about.
DWS supports the private prison industry(a right-wing position) keeping marijuana illegal(another right-wing position)and the payday usury industry(a reactionary position). Tim takes the progressive stance on all three of those issues and also supports ending the economic war against Cuba(something DWS takes the Miami exile line about, as far as I know).
They are both equally pro-LGBTQ and pro-choice(and those two issues are the only ones DWS can fairly be called "progressive" on).
Why is DWS worth re-electing to you?
What's the point?
If HRC gets in, she'll just ditch the House seat and accept some sort of appointment.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):