Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

robbedvoter

(28,290 posts)
261. My vagina just demanded to vote again after reading this
Fri Jul 1, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jul 2016

So, I am not angry about the refusal to accept this historical moment or constant bullying of Hillary supporters - on line.in person, by phone. I feel so relieved to be mansplained! I am not angry about stuff like that http://www.truthdig.com/eartotheground/item/worlds_largest_fart-in_planned_for_hillary_clintons_acceptance_speech_in_ph (good luck with it - it will be outdoors)

good article tk2kewl Jun 2016 #1
great mansplaining about how HRC supporters want a woman President. pnwmom Jun 2016 #157
Great analogy Haveadream Jun 2016 #193
Yup. We love things about Bernie pnwmom Jun 2016 #196
Lol. Ethical and judgement deficiencies Hortensis Jul 2016 #220
How do you feel about Warren as VP? I used to think pnwmom Jul 2016 #221
Talking heads on MSNBC, not a friendly group Hortensis Jul 2016 #225
Actually it's the whole suite of identity politics Scootaloo Jun 2016 #202
I'd prefer a president of any gender who was not pro imperial war n/t eridani Jul 2016 #217
That doesn't have anything to do with the OP. Or Hillary, for that matter. n/t pnwmom Jul 2016 #222
Yeah, it does. It is nonsense to suppose that not liking the Iraq wae vote is sexist. eridani Jul 2016 #223
The OP is supposedly about why Hillary supporters are angry with Bernie. pnwmom Jul 2016 #224
Identity politics can not be her last name? timmymoff Jul 2016 #258
This obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #228
The condescending bullshit never stops. sufrommich Jun 2016 #2
:( :( :( poor winners... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #3
As opposed to sore winners? R. Daneel Olivaw Jun 2016 #10
Your choice of words speaks volumes Cary Jun 2016 #180
thank you for saying this. It's infuriating. n/t yodermon Jul 2016 #252
There is a line to be drawn Cary Jul 2016 #254
Ain't that the truth? Laurian Jun 2016 #13
Bingo. No matter how they try to explain it, it doesn't translate stopbush Jun 2016 #32
Especially to folks that have big fingers in their ears... n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #87
There are a ton of good reasons why people did not support Sanders Gothmog Jun 2016 #116
+1000 Haveadream Jun 2016 #123
One valid reason to vote against Sanders is the desire to preserve President Obama's legacy Gothmog Jun 2016 #130
That point is very important to me. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #174
This is one of the most stupid things I've ever read... TCJ70 Jun 2016 #177
Sanders failed to appeal to African American voters and that cost him the nomination Gothmog Jun 2016 #200
His efforts were doomed because the target audience had no interest no matter what he did Scootaloo Jun 2016 #205
Your analysis is wrong Gothmog Jun 2016 #211
Wait... Scootaloo Jul 2016 #256
Yes, and the person to whom you are replying took part in same AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #251
When you don't want to answer the questions... TCJ70 Jul 2016 #226
What does "Preserve Obama's legacy" mean? AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #208
The only legacy issue I see is the ACA spud_demon Jul 2016 #243
That isn't correct. First, ACA is not the only issue. Second, Sanders has stated seabeyond Jul 2016 #244
Your characterization is way off... TCJ70 Jul 2016 #245
Exactly the point I kept bringing up when he was having this conversation. seabeyond Jul 2016 #248
Regarding Clinton -- I stand corrected, as for the rest spud_demon Jul 2016 #246
Oh my... Lol. Ok. seabeyond Jul 2016 #249
Income inewquality ar record highs, and you want to keep that? Why? n/t eridani Jul 2016 #218
That's some cogent analysis right there! druidity33 Jun 2016 #188
It's not an OP about why Sanders lost Scootaloo Jun 2016 #203
Read the OP-it is a whine as to why Sanders lost Gothmog Jun 2016 #204
I did. I don't think you can say the same Scootaloo Jun 2016 #206
I read it and actually understood it-let me explain it to you Gothmog Jun 2016 #210
You are clearly reading a very different article than the one in the OP Scootaloo Jun 2016 #212
Not really-I just understand the concepts being discussed Gothmog Jul 2016 #216
Exactly -- I don't think most people actually read the article obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #231
The intent of the article was clear to me Gothmog Jul 2016 #253
That absolutely isn't what the OP is about obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #230
good post -- cosign n/t obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #229
There are a ton of good reasons millions who voted Sanders won't Hillary timmymoff Jul 2016 #259
Over 80% of Sanders supporters are already on board with Clinton. seabeyond Jul 2016 #262
That 20% is Yuuuuuuggggge timmymoff Jul 2016 #264
Agreed Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #48
Nope. Agschmid Jun 2016 #61
Agree ... the "high priests of liberalism" are all to happy to ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #64
and the sinners are willing to overlook the sins of their high priestess. timmymoff Jul 2016 #260
Maybe you should try producing less of it. Scootaloo Jun 2016 #201
Nah. n/t seaglass Jun 2016 #4
#2 n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #5
Wrong. My choice was a vote against Bernie. While he may have had some good ideas, his seaglass Jun 2016 #15
yeah but c'mon. Be honest. #2 confirmed. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #25
You listen just about as well as Bernie does. n/t seaglass Jun 2016 #33
There are a ton of good reasons to not support sanders that are not reflected in the silly OP Gothmog Jun 2016 #117
the splaining in this article!!! Her Sister Jun 2016 #6
# 2 again.... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #8
I seized on brilliance and qualifications. Her Sister Jun 2016 #22
Whose? leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #26
DEM Presidential Nominee Her Sister Jun 2016 #51
*mic drop* eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #58
Everything you just said, x a gazillion. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #111
Hillary's -- who has them in spades obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #233
A lot of rehashing of complete bullshit in that one! jcgoldie Jun 2016 #7
Clinton supporters. Not Clinton herself. As typified above... n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #9
Oh sorry I misread it jcgoldie Jun 2016 #24
whoo boy. Must have struck pretty close to home. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #28
Sanders is not doing any of this for himself. pangaia Jun 2016 #66
Lol metroins Jun 2016 #69
I don't think so. pangaia Jun 2016 #71
yes. look to #5 above to explain the two replies below. leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #88
Right. okasha Jun 2016 #190
There is no way that any sentient being could respond to that. pangaia Jun 2016 #192
But you did. okasha Jun 2016 #213
You miss the point in trying to make a funny. pangaia Jul 2016 #239
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jun 2016 #209
Just fine, thanks. okasha Jun 2016 #214
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R Jul 2016 #232
lololololololololololololololololol obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #234
Thank you, Bernie!! LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #11
+1 leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #14
+2 PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #183
Why don't people writing these articles actually ask Hillary supporters how they feel? DanTex Jun 2016 #12
This is what your camp wont understand. Read the article. It isn't theatrics. leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #19
The article is about people like me. I understand me. The author of the article doesn't. DanTex Jun 2016 #23
It sounds like you tho... n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #29
What does that mean? DanTex Jun 2016 #43
Sanders polled higher against Trump. Ash_F Jun 2016 #129
Sanders lost. There is no Sanders. There is only Hillary and Trump. DanTex Jun 2016 #131
OK but if you wanted to beat Trump wouldn't supporting Sanders have made more sense? Ash_F Jun 2016 #132
I don't believe those poll numbers would have held up. But that doesn't matter anymore. DanTex Jun 2016 #136
Why? Ash_F Jun 2016 #138
Because I don't think he'd hold up under GOP attacks. DanTex Jun 2016 #141
That's an opinion not based on evidence. Ash_F Jun 2016 #144
It's an opinion. So is yours. Who cares? The primary is over. It's Hillary or Trump now. DanTex Jun 2016 #145
Apparently you do if you responded to this essay Ash_F Jun 2016 #146
I make decisions based on evidence. Doesn't seem you do. DanTex Jun 2016 #149
Bernie is not helping Trump. That claim is ridiculous. Ash_F Jun 2016 #151
Of course he is. Every day he holds out, Trump celebrates. DanTex Jun 2016 #154
The woman explains herself clearly, if you listen to her. Ash_F Jun 2016 #156
Who cares? It's a disgruntled Hillary supporter from 2008. DanTex Jun 2016 #160
That's a subset. Ash_F Jun 2016 #162
Of course it claims to generalize. It doesn't say "why a tiny subset of Hillary supporters..." DanTex Jun 2016 #163
Oh I don't think it's tiny. Ash_F Jun 2016 #164
Hmm, I though you based your opinions on evidence. DanTex Jun 2016 #165
I do. Ash_F Jun 2016 #179
Hillary certainly does not help herself kacekwl Jun 2016 #166
What does that have to do with Bernie? And what makes you think Hillary DanTex Jun 2016 #167
It has to do with Hillary hurting herself....helping Trump if you will. kacekwl Jun 2016 #182
I only blame Bernie for Bernie's own pro-Trump actions. DanTex Jun 2016 #185
Pro Trump is a ridiculous statement. kacekwl Jun 2016 #191
Did you see he picture on the home page today? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #49
Who cares? Trump CAN'T win. What is important is moving the Democratic party back. leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #80
Gee you guys need to get your stories straight and stick with them DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #184
I'm not mad at him. I just am over him and wish I didn't have to keep hearing about him La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #16
That's pretty much where I'm at. eom BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #59
This and adding JustAnotherGen Jun 2016 #63
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #17
begging for #5 leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #20
It means if the shoe fits... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #53
It's that damn voting vagina argument again. justiceischeap Jun 2016 #18
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #21
Nope, I didn't say that in the least justiceischeap Jun 2016 #42
I have a vagina and I didn't see that in this article! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #52
Please send me a private message I want to know. I never alert posts. JRLeft Jun 2016 #73
The thing is, Hillary supporters aren't angry. They are done with Bernie and his tantrums Fla Dem Jun 2016 #133
Tantrums, LMFAO! Fighting for poor people is a tantrum. JRLeft Jun 2016 #140
Bernie HAD a good message. It's now been lost in his petulance. Fla Dem Jun 2016 #147
It's exactly what you said. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #41
YES! obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #235
Off the subject, speaking of our birth canals libodem Jun 2016 #150
Technically should have said "lady bits" justiceischeap Jun 2016 #153
The only part that matters! libodem Jun 2016 #159
True and it's not even the best part justiceischeap Jun 2016 #169
. libodem Jun 2016 #171
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #27
#5 leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #34
ok. True but it's also true that like it or not Sanders is walking into the leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #39
1900 ???? Her Sister Jun 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #46
If he's still refused to even concede defeat, no Bernie won't get to speak at the convention. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #65
still gonna speak... n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #90
ONLY if he concedes and endorses Hillary beforehand. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #103
The only speaking slots are for the nominee and those who have endorsed. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #173
Your prophecies are becoming more and more as the wings of Icarus. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #112
Nice analogy. greatauntoftriplets Jun 2016 #178
Response #41 DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #142
Why are Sanders pundits still so condescending? randome Jun 2016 #31
Warren was a stunt. She won't be VP. BTW if she had ran instead of Sanders... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #35
Warren 'was' a stunt? I guess she still is, then, huh? randome Jun 2016 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #47
Well there is my wife lol... leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #50
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #54
No I can't. Unless you are prejudiced. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #81
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #85
As fish are completely unaware of the very water they swim in... LanternWaste Jun 2016 #113
I too would have voted for Warren. Still will if she is VP! Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #55
A stunt?? sillly silly. riversedge Jun 2016 #181
Stunt? okasha Jun 2016 #197
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #38
If this is what it takes LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #36
another #5 leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #95
which means what exactly? LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #120
Realize that this is about "you" jimlup Jun 2016 #40
You didn't read the article. leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #91
. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #44
I am also laughing very hard at the weak rationales advanced in the OP Gothmog Jun 2016 #118
This comment is one of the things I do not like about Clinton CBGLuthier Jun 2016 #56
A dishonest and cynical, political move. How odd. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #86
A very hefty pant load! redstateblues Jun 2016 #57
pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffftttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt PeaceNikki Jun 2016 #60
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #101
seems legit ! stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #62
It is! At least from a progressive point of view. leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #84
So the actual title for the article is... one_voice Jun 2016 #67
Uh, just no! leftofcool Jun 2016 #68
When an article calls her a war hawk, I stop reading. bye riversedge Jun 2016 #70
That piece is on point. Every time I tried to engage policy discussions, JRLeft Jun 2016 #72
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #93
That article is a bunch of misogynist garbage. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #74
another #2 who can't think of any reason other than misogyny that leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #79
When the article blatantly declares that people only voted for Hillary because she's a woman, yes. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #102
Jesus Fucking Christ. This shit really does come from the top down. nt LexVegas Jun 2016 #75
THIS is exactly the kind of shit RandySF Jun 2016 #76
Because the truth hurts? John Poet Jun 2016 #176
Because the OP is another smear. RandySF Jun 2016 #199
This article is extremely discouraging Haveadream Jun 2016 #77
It should be discouraging. It is to me as well. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #82
Havadreeam provided thoughtful critique worthy of much more than your one-note reply Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #155
very well thought out reply DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #186
Well, that was the narrative. But I think this narrative was constructed post hoc. redgreenandblue Jul 2016 #247
Or maybe it's because BS and BSers keep trashing the Democratic party. Just a thought... Squinch Jun 2016 #78
#5 is ahead by a landslide. lol n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #96
You might want to read #5 again. Are you afraid I am calling you a misogynist? Because Squinch Jun 2016 #114
LOL La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2016 #83
Sanders former staffers who include a AA woman fun n serious Jun 2016 #92
Sure they do. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #94
Great article! insta8er Jun 2016 #97
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #98
K and R Arazi Jun 2016 #99
I ain't mad tho ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #100
Will quote this from now on! Her Sister Jul 2016 #255
. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #104
Interesting, and I enjoyed reading Xyzse Jun 2016 #105
... SidDithers Jun 2016 #106
Way to be divisive. Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #107
I loath that smilie libodem Jun 2016 #158
What smilie? Dr Hobbitstein Jun 2016 #168
Not yours, hers. libodem Jun 2016 #170
Yes, the lack of discussion of real issues was obvious, like climate change riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #108
Riiiiiight. Because Hillary supporter's concerns aren't about real issues Haveadream Jun 2016 #119
Shrug, look at my post history. I was relentless @ climate change riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #122
Focus on the environment would be better served if the OP were taken to task Haveadream Jun 2016 #127
The people I know who are still very angry at him feel that Sanders mislead people, eastwestdem Jun 2016 #109
Attacking Hillary with 25 years of BS. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #110
The Clinton supporters I know are mad at Bernie and his supporters because... apnu Jun 2016 #115
I'm not mad at him--I just don't think he's terribly relevant any more. WI_DEM Jun 2016 #121
You and the author of this BlueMTexpat Jun 2016 #124
I ain't mad taught_me_patience Jun 2016 #125
Human suffering, while it is asleep, is shapeless. If it is wakened it takes the form of the waker. Snotcicles Jun 2016 #126
Jessie William's brilliant speech on Staying Woke Haveadream Jun 2016 #139
That article is an absolute and utter DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #128
Does the OP have any friends that support Clinton in the real world? Buzz cook Jun 2016 #134
not this shit again forjusticethunders Jun 2016 #135
A flaw iin your arguement; generally progressives were happy with Obama DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #137
k/r - good read 840high Jun 2016 #143
Patently true. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #148
I'm not angry. It's an issue of goals and approach. tandem5 Jun 2016 #152
K&R.. disillusioned73 Jun 2016 #161
Political activism may increase the risk of mental health issues...you may want to read this HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #172
speaking just 4 myself, I'm for Hillary because she's a Liberal, who will get things done & she is Bill USA Jun 2016 #175
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Jun 2016 #187
Wow this is helpful. ronnykmarshall Jun 2016 #189
'Tick Tock' was only one sided, apparently AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #194
Post removed Jamaal510 Jun 2016 #195
Armchair social science Vattel Jun 2016 #198
Well, this one missed, guess there can be more articles, cognitive dissonance on Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #207
I thought he was a weak candidate and deeply flawed as a socialist. Starry Messenger Jul 2016 #215
Why are Sanders Supporters so Angry with Hillary? Night Watchman Jul 2016 #219
lololololololololololololololololol obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #227
whatever the psychology of Hillary supporters, they should NEVER have turned to bashing ... cloudythescribbler Jul 2016 #236
A dishonest caricature of Clinton was being presented. Of course Clinton supporters will challenge. seabeyond Jul 2016 #240
I started with Sanders, went to OMalley and settled on Clinton being my candidate of choice. Please, seabeyond Jul 2016 #237
Most Democrats agree with most of Sanders proposals... Skid Rogue Jul 2016 #238
Most Democrats agree with Clintons positions and see the same, only her ability to find solutions seabeyond Jul 2016 #241
I agree with you 100%. Skid Rogue Jul 2016 #257
Wow this crap! HRC-supporter abusing & haranguing plus splaining article gets 69 rec's! Her Sister Jul 2016 #242
Very poor and rather pedestrian analysis Dem2 Jul 2016 #250
It's because the author is a sports writer who covers golf, KMOD Jul 2016 #265
My vagina just demanded to vote again after reading this robbedvoter Jul 2016 #261
Oh, bull frazzled Jul 2016 #263
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Hillary Clinton Suppo...»Reply #261