2016 Postmortem

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)

6. Your link from 2015 doesn't work.

Reply to leveymg (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 03:56 PM

Jun 2016

But isn't it referring to the IG report recently released that, emphatically did not call for prosecution?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

113 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Intel Community and DOS IGs found that HRC "emails were not retroactively classified" [View all] leveymg Jun 2016 OP

Can't wait to see Brian 'bot-boy' Fallon popping up on Segami Jun 2016 #1

You mean Baghdad Brian? BillZBubb Jun 2016 #8

OPs own post is from 2015. joshcryer Jun 2016 #10

Nope pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #14

They finished the report in August and referred to the FBI. joshcryer Jun 2016 #22

Not full report pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #40

One report is from 2000 and the other WhiteTara Jun 2016 #45

The IC IG pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #49

Seems weird that they would send out their report WhiteTara Jun 2016 #52

Their Report pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #55

Brock, Obama, et al Just Trying To Get Her To Safety... In The WHITE HOUSE... Where She Will Be Safe CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #99

How many IG's are there? Skink Jun 2016 #2

Every federal agency is supposed to have one. Hillary never appointed hers. The current DOS IG has leveymg Jun 2016 #18

The President makes the appointments but nice try...more crap...June 16th. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #61

Do you have the inside skinny as to why there was no DOS IG for 4 years? nt leveymg Jun 2016 #66

Your OP is what's called in football terms, a "Hail Mary", a last second attempt at victory. brush Jun 2016 #79

There's no clinch here. She may be presumed to be the nominee, but that's not a clinch. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #85

MSNBC has already said they will declared her the presumptive nominee tomorrow . . . brush Jun 2016 #89

Weak. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #102

I said they'd declare the presumptive nominee tomorrow brush Jun 2016 #103

Wish the United States Trustee had an OIG unit laserhaas Jun 2016 #81

These are probably those b3 codes we've been hearing about. NWCorona Jun 2016 #3

Do you want to introduce that subject, or should I? leveymg Jun 2016 #69

Feel free NWCorona Jun 2016 #84

I'll jump in... antigop Jun 2016 #91

Here are some other sources that confirm that emails contained intel sources leveymg Jun 2016 #104

The inspector general released his report! MattP Jun 2016 #4

The State Dept IG released his report pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #15

where did you get the information that another report from a different IG would be issued? Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #5

That was a Joint Statement with the DOS on the emails that DOS first released last summer leveymg Jun 2016 #20

ok but I am still confused Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #71

That is correct. The Joint Statement above is from last July. The IG Report is imminent, perhaps leveymg Jun 2016 #73

Your link from 2015 doesn't work. joshcryer Jun 2016 #6

Not the same IG pmorlan1 Jun 2016 #12

OK. joshcryer Jun 2016 #13

Here's the same Joint Statement as posted by the office of the Director of National Intelligence leveymg Jun 2016 #23

They differed to IG State. joshcryer Jun 2016 #24

The affected agencies will all issue reports: IC, DOS leveymg Jun 2016 #25

ok but I am still STILL confused Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #82

NYT reported on 03/03/16 that the IC IG continues to investigate: leveymg Jun 2016 #105

aha.. thank you so much these posts help keep a bit of sanity Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #106

WaPo (03/10/16) HRC campaign fears "the two (IG) offices issue a report that is damaging to Clinton" leveymg Jun 2016 #110

it's unfathomable to me that indictment would not be recommended by Comey Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #111

Hence Hillary's shift in stance from "not classified" to "not *marked* classified". winter is coming Jun 2016 #7

to "not marked classified *after* we stripped them to send them nonsecure" MisterP Jun 2016 #33

If it wasn't marked as classified... scscholar Jun 2016 #76

She was the Secretary of State, not a temp answering phones. winter is coming Jun 2016 #88

10 days left for this crap MFM008 Jun 2016 #9

This is a Dept State and Intel Coimmunity statement the Clinton campaign misrepresented. Censor it? leveymg Jun 2016 #26

Have you promoted yourself to official timekeeper? You add so much to discussion with all these JudyM Jun 2016 #38

Any idea when we might see the IC IG report? unc70 Jun 2016 #11

My sense is the IC report third week of June, FBI findings 2 weeks after that. leveymg Jun 2016 #27

That's my sense too, leveymg... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #32

The party elders have had since March, 2015 to do succession planning. leveymg Jun 2016 #35

She's already a tremendous risk to the... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #39

They probably thought it necessary to keep the Clinton campaign machine together. This was the only leveymg Jun 2016 #50

Your timing is better for Dems than mine unc70 Jun 2016 #37

I think we pretty much agree on most of this. leveymg Jun 2016 #53

Had they recovered all the emails last fall? unc70 Jun 2016 #75

According to Paul, and I've also read it, the FBI has had a complete set of all 60,000 emails leveymg Jun 2016 #83

IMO, there's way too much effort being put into stalling this jeff47 Jun 2016 #48

I actually don't expect the FBI Report will make a recommendation. But it will confirm the IC IG leveymg Jun 2016 #65

Isn't this report the one they put on hold for the FBI? Bob41213 Jun 2016 #80

Actually, Blumenthal and his sources are the safe ones. jeff47 Jun 2016 #46

Actually, Tyler Drumheller's sources had active security clearances and took classified materials leveymg Jun 2016 #57

Here's information that's much more current justiceischeap Jun 2016 #16

That's somebody's opinion an Op-ed and spin from a discredited advocacy site. Specific intent isn't leveymg Jun 2016 #28

+1000 lmbradford Jun 2016 #96

It's really hard to get behind the excuse that she is stupid. libdem4life Jun 2016 #51

How about arrogant? Out of touch with reality? Both seem very possible to me. Seeinghope Jun 2016 #59

Well, I didn't want to go overboard, be a hater and all, libdem4life Jun 2016 #64

The question may also be, when did she really abide by the rules? Seeinghope Jun 2016 #86

The Clintons do not play by the rules. They, somewhat like the Bushes, libdem4life Jun 2016 #98

Deutch was not prosecuted and Petraeus knowingly gave away classified material. randome Jun 2016 #17

Neither of them became the Democratic Party nominee for President, either. Meh to you. leveymg Jun 2016 #30

And if Petraeus or Deutch ever did run for Prez... Peachhead22 Jun 2016 #72

Clinton received and may have sent classified information... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #34

She knew. Here's one such email from Blum. to HRC leveymg Jun 2016 #43

This is the standard of defense you're at? Bob41213 Jun 2016 #67

K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #19

kick nt antigop Jun 2016 #21

Kick Segami Jun 2016 #29

Cavalier about classified information, lies about it, and then wants to be elected POTUS. senz Jun 2016 #31

Let's all clap as hard as we can. We can make this happen DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #36

You better start clapping for the non-indictment fairy... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #41

For Bernie. Sing along, tex-wyo-dem -:) DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #42

Hillary is going to find "the end of the line" a lot more uncomfortable than Bernie. leveymg Jun 2016 #44

... DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #47

Thank you for kicking the thread. leveymg Jun 2016 #77

My pleasure. I need a laugh. DemocratSinceBirth Jun 2016 #78

This message was self-deleted by its author tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #90

Bye, Felicia. Lizzie Poppet Jun 2016 #58

I have a message for you from DSB.. DCBob Jun 2016 #60

Oh,...ok....I was expecting another poll.....my mistake, carry on. Segami Jun 2016 #63

DemocratSinceBirth wears your scorn like a medal of honor KingFlorez Jun 2016 #62

Just serving as messenger here: Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #68

My sources tell me that Democrat Since Birth does indeed wear your scorn as a medal. Trust Buster Jun 2016 #87

DSB et al wears this kind of scorn like a medal, we put it on our walls uponit7771 Jun 2016 #95

Heads are gonna explode at Castle Bansalot. HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #54

ROFL Segami Jun 2016 #56

+1 tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #92

excelllent work and analysis Leveymg. grasswire Jun 2016 #70

Thanks! Feel free to share with attribution. leveymg Jun 2016 #74

I guess you missed this part... DCBob Jun 2016 #93

"rather these emails contained classified information WHEN THEY WERE GENERATED" antigop Jun 2016 #94

^^^^This lmbradford Jun 2016 #97

K&R. think Jun 2016 #100

Honestly, I forgot to even consider this Inspector General Babel_17 Jun 2016 #101

I'm noticing everytime someine posts one of okieinpain Jun 2016 #107

Kick berni_mccoy Jun 2016 #108

At best, the off-the-books communication is insubordinate. Octafish Jun 2016 #109

so, pls explain to me how she can have a security clearance, based on your OP antigop Jun 2016 #112

Meet the new Decider in Chief. Security Clearances are for the little people. leveymg Jun 2016 #113