Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
15. This is where I think this is all going and have for some time:
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:31 PM
Jun 2016

Judge orders GOP get more Clinton-related emails before conventions
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/06/hillary-clinton-emails-repubican-national-committee-223793

The requests appear to focus on Clinton critics' claims that the activities of the Clinton Foundation and of some former aides to the Clintons improperly influenced official business at the State Department and USAID. After USAID didn't fork over any documents, the RNC filed a lawsuit in March.


Six of the roughly 38 lawsuits on Clintons emails are from the RNC:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2585867
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-email-idUSMTZSAPEC39S3O4PJ

They want fodder on the Clinton Foundation.

A couple of things folks may be overlooking: the GOP controlled Senate and House are sitting back collecting all this information by the IGs and these investigations/depositions/legal efforts. At some point, with all her lying about this, she may face a contempt charge. But the bigger one is the fishing for emails helps give them substance to string together allegations about the Clinton Foundation. And I guarantee you, that's going to catch a lot more attention that emails with average Americans.

The problem with it is - it's too late for Hillary to clear her name on those allegations when they come. They're going pump the "crooked" narrative and going to show folks "how much money the Clintons got from Saudi Arabia or foreigners on military contracts", etc flirting with the notion of the Clintons getting rich from kickbacks.

With the emails and snippets of evidence they're collecting, they'll be painting an ugly picture with some evidence to present a convincing spin. The House might subpoena her for testimony on the Clinton Foundation during the general elections for example.

The emails are hurting her. The above will really damage her. These are not nice people - they're going to do it to her whether they're accurate or not.

Between now and June 16th. hopefully someone will figure out how to defend against that because after the 16th, we're probably not going to be able to talk about it.

That's what really scares me.
It was defeated by right wing advertising on TV upaloopa Jun 2016 #1
Very, very peculiar how a person, and presumably a Sanders supporter, could fault her for trying. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #2
Well, this part is a little interesting in terms of linkage Jarqui Jun 2016 #4
Thanks for posting the links... KoKo Jun 2016 #6
They and the media know that people lie for a reason. Jarqui Jun 2016 #8
Again, thanks for the links...hope visitors will read them... KoKo Jun 2016 #9
This is where I think this is all going and have for some time: Jarqui Jun 2016 #15
Yep...Some have had problems with "Watergate" Connection KoKo Jun 2016 #16
"...private parties with a stake in the outcome." dchill Jun 2016 #3
27 different legislative proposals.... identified in the media by 110 different names IADEMO2004 Jun 2016 #5
The people who always accuse Hillary supporters of spouting RW talking points politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2016 #7
It's really a "Point of Discussion" for those of us Hard Core Dems who KoKo Jun 2016 #10
But 'we' who lived through that time know enough to discount right-wing pundits. randome Jun 2016 #12
I don't need you to try and school me on how to read and interpret a news article. politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2016 #13
H. Clinton wants to operate in secret, behind closed doors, outside of public scrutiny. tabasco Jun 2016 #11
It's like we are "moving backward instead of forward." KoKo Jun 2016 #14
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"In 1997--three years aft...»Reply #15