Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
21. OK I will appoint you Supreme Commander of the Universe, but maybe only on one condition...
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:14 AM
May 2016

Bernie's in the White House, AND he gives me the job to appoint Supreme Commanders of the Universe.

Caveat:
In case there are more than one supreme commander to be appointed, I'll be very busy appointing them.
However I can guarantee you the below-described appointment, to be bestowed in plenty of time for his re-election:

• Most Honorable & Supreme Commander of the Universe, Voting Division •.

MISSION: You shall bring forth One (1) Uniformly Honest & Verifiable National Voting System.



You herewith have my fully anonymous, virtuous, and virtual vow which I have herewith and heretoforewhich signed in virtual blood and virtually sealed for posterity with virtual sealing wax, from the ceiling.

Should such a system be so hard to order into existence? I think not. Not with the right appointments.
And with hope? almost anything is possible.

I believe we can confidently expect a disaster Voice for Peace May 2016 #1
You're welcome. auntpurl May 2016 #9
OK I will appoint you Supreme Commander of the Universe, but maybe only on one condition... Voice for Peace May 2016 #21
I'm going to hang that virtual vow on my wall! auntpurl May 2016 #25
ok but it doesn't work unless Bernie wins. But don't despair, because don't forget that facts don't exist as future entities.. Voice for Peace May 2016 #44
Super Delegates should NOT be counted in the total until the convention when they vote. bkkyosemite May 2016 #52
The number without SDs is 2026 lagomorph777 May 2016 #41
"The whole system ... is convoluted." Yeah it is. (nt) apnu May 2016 #16
Bernie!Bernie!Bernie! coco77 May 2016 #2
women candidates only get credit for 78% of the delegates that men get credit for nt geek tragedy May 2016 #3
Hmmm, that might help explain the berniebrain Hortensis May 2016 #5
there's no evidence that what Bernie is doing is about ego. that's called you projecting your Exilednight May 2016 #45
That's not my belief, Exilednight, nor what Hortensis May 2016 #56
Huh, you left out the only actually important number, which is 2026 Recursion May 2016 #4
Yes, thank you for that addition. auntpurl May 2016 #7
she only has 1769.....she needs enough California delegates to push her over that line. virtualobserver May 2016 #8
I agree. When she has the majority of pledged delegates, that's when she has the sole and exclusive geek tragedy May 2016 #13
VI and PR in the meantime too though. auntpurl May 2016 #17
Thank you. riversedge May 2016 #43
I understand your points Tom Rinaldo May 2016 #6
No, clinching will be in 7 days when the major media, Hortensis May 2016 #10
Nope. morningfog May 2016 #36
Clinching means the same when a woman does it as it did when men did it geek tragedy May 2016 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #38
No need for replacement or machinations - simply nominate the safer candidate: lagomorph777 May 2016 #42
Unless she wins 2383 delegates before the convention, she has not clinched. Now, whoever wins MillennialDem May 2016 #48
Incorrect. That is not the standard that has been applied to men so it will geek tragedy May 2016 #50
Ummm, it's math. Effectively over and clinching are not the same thing. I don't care that it was MillennialDem May 2016 #53
Same standard applies to Clinton as applied to Obama. geek tragedy May 2016 #54
What the fuck. It's math. Clinch means guaranteed victory. That is impossible unless 2383 delegates MillennialDem May 2016 #55
She is almost certain to reach a majority of pledged delegates by June 7 auntpurl May 2016 #12
Yes I think we agree on all counts Tom Rinaldo May 2016 #19
"I would however still press her to adopt policies and priorities that were important to me, and to auntpurl May 2016 #20
And that, of course, aside from actually determining who is our nominee, is why all votes count Tom Rinaldo May 2016 #26
You're right. auntpurl May 2016 #27
Hillary clinching the nomination could be the disaster. Vinca May 2016 #14
so what you're really saying is that she can't clinch the nomination until after the SDs vote at the Exilednight May 2016 #15
You can think that if you choose. auntpurl May 2016 #18
Bernie has a right to try to steal the nomination after losing the vote, just as everyone else has geek tragedy May 2016 #22
Exactly. bvf May 2016 #37
I question why they believe that they can spam the boards with this tripe Exilednight May 2016 #46
The management seems to be OK with it. bvf May 2016 #57
I've been watching the process since I was a child, the 'super delegates' are not historicaly Bluenorthwest May 2016 #23
Superdelegates (or unpledged, if you prefer) didn't come into being until 1984. auntpurl May 2016 #24
Your OP is very condescending and presumptive, it's full of inaccurate and semi accurate rhetoric Bluenorthwest May 2016 #33
Wow. Ok then. auntpurl May 2016 #34
It's not semantics. It's also not an opinion, the terms are in our Party's regulations which you Bluenorthwest May 2016 #39
Ok nt auntpurl May 2016 #40
You were not paying as close attention GulfCoast66 May 2016 #29
Yeah, I know that. I did not say otherwise. Bluenorthwest May 2016 #35
The entire process the year was supposed to be a coronation for Mrs Clinton Doctor_J May 2016 #59
Why are you arguing truth, math, facts, and logic with BSers? rock May 2016 #28
Being snide as usual, nothing better to do? Logical May 2016 #30
Yeah, it's boring rock May 2016 #31
You guys are so clueless, but not a shock. Her name gets votes. Nt Logical May 2016 #32
The MAJORITY of pledged delegates is 2026, not 1664.... What this means is that if you MillennialDem May 2016 #47
"Barring a disaster"? I think you mean, despite it. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #49
. Dem2 May 2016 #51
In every contested primary since adoption of super delegates, the winner is announced including SDs Gothmog May 2016 #58
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Oh my goodness, Bernie su...»Reply #21