Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
What crimes did Clinton blow the whistle on with her e-mail server? w4rma May 2016 #1
Excellent deflection rock May 2016 #9
Hillary Clinton’s Energy Initiative Pressed Countries to Embrace Fracking, New Emails Reveal w4rma May 2016 #41
Hillary Clinton Pushes Colombia Free Trade Agreement In Latest Email Dump w4rma May 2016 #43
what an irrelevant and predicatable response in line with the unreasoning hatred of Hillary. MariaThinks May 2016 #81
So, you believe that Hillary can do no wrong. Like a cult? (nt) w4rma May 2016 #82
there's a real difference between doing no wrong and doing wrong. I certainly don't believe hillary MariaThinks May 2016 #127
Sub sailor's photo case draws comparisons to Clinton emails w4rma May 2016 #165
Transparency was the key treestar May 2016 #86
It is my understanding that Clinton deleted more tha 30,000 e-mails, many of which w4rma May 2016 #102
An excellent point there, w4rma! Intent matters. Shemp Howard May 2016 #132
This post makes NO sense! Chasstev365 May 2016 #2
It makes perfect sense bravenak May 2016 #3
Thanks Bravenak rock May 2016 #14
Me neither these days, lol bravenak May 2016 #20
Consider the source melman May 2016 #134
Ouch, is what I might have said in 5th Grade! Chasstev365 May 2016 #138
Yes. It is amusing. hrmjustin May 2016 #4
I try not to laugh bravenak May 2016 #6
I think some of it is peer pressure. hrmjustin May 2016 #8
Me too. A bubble bravenak May 2016 #12
Nothing amusing about this at all....and Snowdon was a whistleblower... seekthetruth May 2016 #5
He STOLE bravenak May 2016 #7
Then join the GOP.... seekthetruth May 2016 #11
A reprimand is all her violations merit bravenak May 2016 #26
Like I said.... seekthetruth May 2016 #28
I am a democrat bravenak May 2016 #30
When BSS fails to counter a point they resort to their fave ad hom redstateblues May 2016 #67
It is just projection bravenak May 2016 #69
So tow the party line even when it's wrong? seekthetruth May 2016 #96
No. Don't burn down my own house is my thinking bravenak May 2016 #98
Theft is generally allowable in the case of whistleblowing... LP2K12 May 2016 #55
Not when they take it out of the country and do not follow procedure!!!! bravenak May 2016 #56
But wait... LP2K12 May 2016 #57
She did not RUN AWAY to China abd Russia and allow access to the data purposefully!! bravenak May 2016 #59
"We got the report and she has been properly chastised."... ljm2002 May 2016 #171
Thought you might enjoy this... LP2K12 May 2016 #189
He says he needs to be punished bravenak May 2016 #190
Yes... LP2K12 May 2016 #191
I'm afraid following procedure has proven too many times to result in retribution or prosecution. floriduck May 2016 #177
Of course it does bravenak May 2016 #179
Daniel Ellsberg stole as well. dflprincess May 2016 #143
Did he flee to China and Putin's Russia, too? bravenak May 2016 #144
Snowden's revelations did actual harm and damage to US operations..so say the experts. nt Jitter65 May 2016 #193
But what is wrong with breaking the law treestar May 2016 #88
LOLfuckingOL Here's a dollar, go buy a clue with it... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #10
sunlight vs. secrecy AtomicKitten May 2016 #21
.that^ 840high May 2016 #72
But that's LOGIC. It has no place inside the bubble of idolatry. dchill May 2016 #109
Dumbest shit ever posted here. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #13
!!! AtomicKitten May 2016 #53
'aye 840high May 2016 #73
non responsive treestar May 2016 #91
Is that the new talking point? bobbobbins01 May 2016 #140
So how the Secretary of State handles sensitive information... ljm2002 May 2016 #172
There has been a few occasions like this, one should be imprisoned when a crime isnt committed Thinkingabout May 2016 #15
It's all about anger bravenak May 2016 #23
Not about anger at all for me.... seekthetruth May 2016 #25
And I want our NSA workers to not steal info and take it to other nations bravenak May 2016 #29
I was reminded every year about espionage, he intentionally went to work in order to collect Thinkingabout May 2016 #77
And if he came back for trial, we'd see the same folks who are so law and order today bravenak May 2016 #78
She violated a lot more than just rules. Nt tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #83
So did he.nt bravenak May 2016 #85
Yeah he did...so what's your point? tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #101
He had security clearance. High standard applies to him as to her. bravenak May 2016 #103
He ran because the laws for protecting whistleblowers... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #106
Any excuse is good enough so long as it aint Hillary. Mm hmm bravenak May 2016 #107
I'm not defending Snowden...He did break the law and... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #117
She is already facing the music as we speak bravenak May 2016 #119
She broke laws... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #122
She did not run away like a criminal bravenak May 2016 #124
She's felt all along she will get out of it. tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #128
...private server thang... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #16
So you don't understand... LP2K12 May 2016 #17
Snowden isn't running for president.... seekthetruth May 2016 #18
The ones wailing for her indictment appear foolish bravenak May 2016 #22
Did you ever think the reprimand she received would ever happen either? seekthetruth May 2016 #24
Actually, there's no difference. TwilightZone May 2016 #35
That one is ridiculous treestar May 2016 #93
I do think if this is about FOIA and records-keeping laws, it is worth remembering Warren DeMontague May 2016 #19
Trash thread nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #27
Not only that, but perhaps if her emails were on the GOVERNMENT server, they might have... George II May 2016 #31
She might have PREVENTED proprietary info from getting into the hands of China or Russia bravenak May 2016 #34
okay, now I know that you have no intention of being honest about this. grasswire May 2016 #38
Those calling her a killer are the dishonest ones as are those who want her imprisoned bravenak May 2016 #42
you should break the law when it is the "right" thing to do treestar May 2016 #95
To hear tell... NO emails were ever written or received by Hillary that were born classified. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #112
Apples and screwdrivers.... alittlelark May 2016 #32
Now that you mention it... Sheepshank May 2016 #33
Funny how the GOP is also using the same info to call for her arrest bravenak May 2016 #36
you are hyperventilating grasswire May 2016 #37
I am breathing fine bravenak May 2016 #39
You guys need to stop playing lawyer. annavictorious May 2016 #51
Fuck all that, I'm still trying to figure out what the hell ML FUCKING K has to do with any of this! Number23 May 2016 #76
That's the new thing: just throw MLK and oligarchs in wherever the fancy strikes you. Squinch May 2016 #99
I think we're seeing the genesis of Tea Party 2.0 annavictorious May 2016 #40
It has an almost deist vibe to it bravenak May 2016 #44
You know what's not amusing? The fact that so few politicians, including HRC, have anything bjo59 May 2016 #45
He is very dismissive himself and derides my party as corrupt bravenak May 2016 #47
Not true...Im a Snowden aware..and his arrest laserhaas May 2016 #46
You think INTENT is all that matters? bravenak May 2016 #48
It's not about the emails KingFlorez May 2016 #49
Such a BOLD woman bravenak May 2016 #50
That's exactly it. brush May 2016 #114
What kind of mental contortions TransitJohn May 2016 #52
None bravenak May 2016 #54
your false analogy depends upon the exclusion of ethics TheSarcastinator May 2016 #58
So his professional responsibilities included using his security clearance to steal our data???? bravenak May 2016 #60
He was responsible to all of U.S. and she was irresponsible laserhaas May 2016 #111
He stole and fled the nation bravenak May 2016 #113
Yeah...thats bullchit..He reported on defraud of the nation laserhaas May 2016 #116
He is not Paul Revere! bravenak May 2016 #118
1st of all Paul Revere wasn% Paul Revere laserhaas May 2016 #120
And Snowden is a glorified data thief bravenak May 2016 #121
You mean like Homeland...NSA..etc laserhaas May 2016 #145
He did it for attention and so he could be feted by foreign powers bravenak May 2016 #146
Your just being snide..petty and hateful laserhaas May 2016 #148
You have no evidence that his intentions are good bravenak May 2016 #149
Correct...but the results were good..that he exposed it laserhaas May 2016 #155
He needs to face the music bravenak May 2016 #156
Says who? You mean like Manning? laserhaas May 2016 #158
Snowden is a hero bravenak. Sorry. Ash_F May 2016 #61
He's a Libertarian hero, no question there. ucrdem May 2016 #62
Watch this when you have some time. It's amazing Ash_F May 2016 #63
Thanks for this laserhaas May 2016 #159
He sure is bravenak May 2016 #68
Nope bravenak May 2016 #65
He's only a hero to those who disregard his revealing details of his own country's . . . brush May 2016 #115
So just to be clear on the analogy... Warren Stupidity May 2016 #64
I am showing you the double standard against Hillary bravenak May 2016 #66
well there you go, not one point addressed, what a shock. Warren Stupidity May 2016 #70
My pount is that he is defended for crimes that are way worse than hers because of fee fees bravenak May 2016 #71
and an excellent pount it is. Warren Stupidity May 2016 #74
Benefit to society is not anything to worry about bravenak May 2016 #75
Er no, if she committed any felonies it wasn't for "bad data protection" Warren Stupidity May 2016 #79
He did it for the attention and free trip around the world bravenak May 2016 #80
It is a major inconsistency treestar May 2016 #84
I would think they might go easy on her in hope she might go easy on him later bravenak May 2016 #87
Snowden exposes government and corporate arrogance and hypocrisy. kpola12 May 2016 #89
Nope. He stole our data. bravenak May 2016 #90
Lets just say I didn't miss your posts when you were on vacation. nt Logical May 2016 #92
I do not believe you bravenak May 2016 #94
You are right, but you forget the other inconsistency karynnj May 2016 #97
He did flee from prosecution rather than actually blowing the whistle nationally bravenak May 2016 #100
Bernie Logic. Lil Missy May 2016 #104
Soon we wont have any subject untouched bravenak May 2016 #110
I find you tend to generalize a lot and lump people together elias7 May 2016 #105
Find your own box to get into bravenak May 2016 #108
But you are so good at putting people in boxes, let me see so far we have seen insta8er May 2016 #129
Whatever bravenak May 2016 #130
You are welcome, thank you for the rebuttal it was quite uplifting. insta8er May 2016 #133
I don't get in to boxes elias7 May 2016 #173
I'm not angry. They are the one frothing with bitter rage against Hillary bravenak May 2016 #187
This one is simple... Skid Rogue May 2016 #123
Absolutely. Thank you. bravenak May 2016 #125
Excellent point! pandr32 May 2016 #126
Ha! bravenak May 2016 #131
I guess the pentagon papers were equivalent to SpareribSP May 2016 #135
Snowden knows what he leaked, and he knows why. lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #136
Oh we should just trust the thief who stole the data to be doing the right thing? bravenak May 2016 #137
Well said. barrow-wight May 2016 #139
It's going to suck for you when the FBI and Intelligence Agency's reports come out Arazi May 2016 #141
Yeah yeah yeah bravenak May 2016 #142
Clinton's charity took in millions..from foreigners laserhaas May 2016 #147
LMFAO. nt. polly7 May 2016 #150
Yes yes yes great analysis underthematrix May 2016 #151
It really is silly the way people like him are built up bravenak May 2016 #153
IMO, this analysis... Skid Rogue May 2016 #152
Pretty much bravenak May 2016 #154
The Hillary supporters mostly were pro-prosecution for Snowden cpwm17 May 2016 #157
I know! I think about that too. betsuni May 2016 #160
It gives me the spins bravenak May 2016 #161
In the hypocritical world (and authoritarian world) cpwm17 May 2016 #166
We need a candidate who respects TRANSPARENCY... ContinentalOp May 2016 #162
Yeah, they're nothing if not hypocrites. Cha May 2016 #163
History is being made with or without them! bravenak May 2016 #164
I think you're missing their primary motivation: baldguy May 2016 #167
It's so fucinkg gross how Trump Trolls run around infiltrating our spaces bravenak May 2016 #180
So true workinclasszero May 2016 #168
Snowden's intent: Expose war crimes. Hillary's intent: Hide crimes and other wrongdoing. Scuba May 2016 #169
So you get to decide which ends justify the means? Sheepshank May 2016 #174
Equivalents? thesquanderer May 2016 #170
The VERY SAME PEOPLE bravenak May 2016 #183
But Snowden is a hero!!!! mcar May 2016 #175
Woman bad, man good bravenak May 2016 #185
Just so simple mcar May 2016 #188
+1 uponit7771 May 2016 #192
Snowden was not trying to be my representative for the presidency of the United States!!!!!!!!!!!!! highprincipleswork May 2016 #176
Same laws apply no matter who ya are bravenak May 2016 #181
Great comparison. I agree neither Snowden nor Clinton are qualified to be President. basselope May 2016 #178
I don't think that either of them should be arrested or incarcerated. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #182
I think I'm fine with neither being arrested but he can stay there bravenak May 2016 #184
We certainly disagree on her possible future address. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #186
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Know what amuses me about...»Reply #146