Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
59. Yawn
Thu May 26, 2016, 03:00 PM
May 2016

She will still have the most pledged delegates so she will win. I'm beginning to feel sorry for those who cannot accept that reality.

so we can make it seen grasswire May 2016 #1
yes, please make it go viral; this is not what the M$M, and especially MSNBC, wants anyone to see amborin May 2016 #4
Uh, the video is *from* MSNBC. Garrett78 May 2016 #57
yes, but they removed if from their website amborin Jun 2016 #120
People here, including myself, watched the video after you made that claim. Garrett78 Jun 2016 #122
RIP Sanders wallyworld2 May 2016 #53
you do know that "Wallyworld" is a FOX personality? nt grasswire May 2016 #67
No I did not know that wallyworld2 May 2016 #70
K&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #2
Thanks for this, amborin! I clicked on it and it played. This MSNBC vid is AMAZING! Peace Patriot May 2016 #3
yes, Peace Patriot, MSNBC took it down, amazing that Kornacki was permitted to run through the math amborin May 2016 #5
"War Admiral" - how ironic. CNN panel tonight couldn't wait to conflate Trump protesters with Bernie snowy owl May 2016 #6
Yes, I just watched it and it looks like a brokered convention will happen Samantha May 2016 #10
He also said Clinton and Sanders are close in CA and that will not put her over the top (eom) Samantha May 2016 #11
It will be over after California hack89 May 2016 #58
According to Kornachi, after the estimated pledged delegates are awarded, she needs to win 95% Samantha May 2016 #95
She does not need a certain number of pledged delegates to win... Demsrule86 May 2016 #109
I understand that a simple majority can work but I also understand the supers do not count until Samantha May 2016 #112
I don't think you understand how the process works HarmonyRockets Jun 2016 #126
Ditto what Samantha says, and, additionally, Obama was not under FBI Investigation amborin May 2016 #118
It has to go to a second vote to be a brokered convention hack89 May 2016 #54
Exactly. There are only 2 candidates. 1 of them will reach 2383. Garrett78 May 2016 #56
I rec this post. malokvale77 May 2016 #27
thank you on both counts!!!!!!! amborin Jun 2016 #124
What a great commentary! bjo59 May 2016 #38
Remember Secretariat? okasha May 2016 #94
I just took a look at the film of the actual race between SheilaT May 2016 #106
It's exactly as Bernie said. Yet "some" here insist Hill has already won, BUT SHE HASN'T. senz May 2016 #7
I sent it to a facebook friend who has a huge following. grasswire May 2016 #8
Try to imagine Hillary being President and her running her administration the way she has run Samantha May 2016 #13
So what. She is going to win on the first ballot. So much ado about what? Jitter65 May 2016 #15
So why the panic? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #17
Have you noticed... malokvale77 May 2016 #29
Finnessing finally a time line nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #30
I've been enjoying your local reports. malokvale77 May 2016 #33
Thanks nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34
Oh dear... malokvale77 May 2016 #35
Tom and I intend to nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #36
That press conference was extremely interesting! bjo59 May 2016 #39
Big Ol' K & R! AzDar May 2016 #9
Kick -- b/c the Hill folk need to see this! senz May 2016 #12
K&R nt Live and Learn May 2016 #14
I haven't seen many people expect her to hit the 2383 on pledged delegates alone. barrow-wight May 2016 #16
We shall see if your vote suppression efforts work out. Peace Patriot May 2016 #18
My vote suppression efforts? barrow-wight May 2016 #19
they're like little ads NJCher Jun 2016 #128
I wish they would. barrow-wight Jun 2016 #130
We have always known this fun n serious May 2016 #20
I'm posting this info right now in GD: Primaries, amborin. Peace Patriot May 2016 #21
Kornaki was repeating what Sanders said.. asuhornets May 2016 #22
and that means exactly...what? NorthCarolina May 2016 #23
Amazing. Did this get X-POSTED to the Group, I hope. appalachiablue May 2016 #24
please do amborin Jun 2016 #134
Go Bernie! Joob May 2016 #25
No, look again, Kornacki is only talking about pledged delegates. procon May 2016 #26
Kick! nt LiberalElite May 2016 #28
The threshold is 2384 total delegates, not 2384 pledged delegates alone. Lord Magus May 2016 #31
Common sense and objectivity doesn't go over well with some 'round these parts. randome May 2016 #73
What it means is 1884 pledged delegates for Hillary, vs 2344 pledged delegates for Bernie quaker bill May 2016 #83
K & R nt findrskeep May 2016 #32
k/r thanks 840high May 2016 #37
There must be an epidemic of people claiming Clinton will reach 2383 via pledged delegates alone. Garrett78 May 2016 #40
Clinton will win the nomination June 7 in California. baldguy May 2016 #41
Hillary cannot reach the required number of pledged delegates before the convention, B Calm May 2016 #42
Both pledged and superdelegates count equally toward the total needed. procon May 2016 #43
You are not making any sense what-so-ever! Supers don't even vote until the convention. B Calm May 2016 #44
And? procon May 2016 #45
You are wrong, I watched it and reported what he said here Samantha May 2016 #76
He's only talking about pledged delegates because that's what Sanders is trying to push. procon May 2016 #77
You are the one living in la-la land if you think you can count those SD votes before they are cast Samantha May 2016 #78
That's not even at issue, so why are you only looking at the pledged count, procon May 2016 #79
Take a look at the thread title and that will answer your question Samantha May 2016 #80
Um... that was your assertion, I simply questioned your erroneous conclusions. nt procon May 2016 #81
They're not pretending. okasha May 2016 #97
No delegates GulfCoast66 May 2016 #48
Everyone "pretends" the winner on election day has won the election onenote May 2016 #52
you do know they vote on the first ballot WhiteTara May 2016 #102
Supers commit Demsrule86 May 2016 #110
There is no "required" number of pledged delegates onenote May 2016 #51
Supers should not be bkkyosemite May 2016 #111
I don't disagree. onenote May 2016 #113
this is the truth, anything else is the big lie that camp HRC wants the public to swallow amborin May 2016 #92
All Hillary has to hit is 2,026, which is a guarantee that the supers will then vote for her Tarc May 2016 #46
Pretty much, and she'll far surpass 2026. Garrett78 May 2016 #47
Strawman: I don't know of anyone who has claimed that Clinton will have 2383 pledged delegates onenote May 2016 #49
Agreed. Garrett78 May 2016 #50
Clinton needs 78 delegates to clinch the nomination. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #55
1769 Pledged delegates and 540 Superdelegates = 2309 delegates Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #68
My bad. Thanks. I believe in math. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #69
Don't be silly - you might have seen a site with different figures Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #71
73. And the elected-super distinction is utterly irrelevant in this race. ucrdem May 2016 #85
A delegate is a delegate. There is no distinction between the too, I know. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #87
There is a distinction, though. Garrett78 May 2016 #88
Sanders will not win the majority of pledged delegates. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #90
Of course not. I've been saying that for months. Garrett78 May 2016 #91
Yawn leftynyc May 2016 #59
This video is extremely misleading. TeacherB87 May 2016 #60
Amborin says the MSM, especially MSNBC, doesn't want anyone to see that MSNBC video. Garrett78 May 2016 #61
It's really disheartening. TeacherB87 May 2016 #63
Remember that DU is not representative of the population at large. Garrett78 May 2016 #64
I know, but TeacherB87 May 2016 #65
That's interesting. I wasn't around back then. My theory: Garrett78 May 2016 #66
Also, progressives TeacherB87 May 2016 #75
That's certainly a factor, as well. Garrett78 May 2016 #82
I just listened to it Time for change May 2016 #62
How convenient Demsrule86 May 2016 #72
HERE'S WHAT STEVE SAID. senz May 2016 #74
Nobody disputes the idea that Clinton won't reach 2383 via pledged delegates alone. Garrett78 May 2016 #89
Exactly. And MSNBC took down the video because they knew it was misleading. eastwestdem May 2016 #93
Really Demsrule86 May 2016 #84
Hillary needs 73 more delegates to clinch. Bernie needs 841. ucrdem May 2016 #86
She needs 612 more pledged delegates (Kornacki's number) to make it to the magic number Samantha May 2016 #96
And Bernie would need nearly 1000. okasha May 2016 #98
He is 271 pledged delegates behind her right now Samantha May 2016 #99
So he would need that many plus ~600 more to get 2383 in pledged delegates alone. okasha May 2016 #100
Bernie was a Democratic Socialist for years and caucused with the Democratic Party Samantha May 2016 #103
It is perfectly possible to be a socialist and a Democrat at the same time. okasha May 2016 #105
No, he remains an honest broker and his campaign is doing well Samantha May 2016 #115
From what he said recently, he is shooting for a simple majority of pledged delegates over Hillary Samantha May 2016 #104
To get a majority of pledged delegates, he'll need about 75% of the California vote... brooklynite May 2016 #116
This is irrelevant as it was in 2008 underthematrix May 2016 #101
I saw it and the way Kornacki explains it, Bernie's got a real shot at the convention. ancianita May 2016 #107
You really don't understand the process Demsrule86 May 2016 #108
K & R lmbradford May 2016 #114
kornacki is an idiot....the nomination is based on pledge and supers...and hillary will have the beachbum bob May 2016 #117
Kickin' For The Dense And The Diehards... AzDar May 2016 #119
Kicking for the obtuse... AzDar Jun 2016 #121
Show me a post where someone claimed Clinton will reach 2383 via pledged delegates alone. Garrett78 Jun 2016 #123
If Hillary gets just 50% of the remaining pleaded delegates she will go into the convention needing Jitter65 Jun 2016 #125
She'd need about 115. Regardless, she'll get there quickly. Garrett78 Jun 2016 #127
It doesn't matter. Superdelegates DO count - regardless of Bernie insisting they don't. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #129
#BernieScience. ucrdem Jun 2016 #131
And how ironic that he wants to steal unpledged delegates that voted for Hillary in order to win. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #132
lol...again with the alternative reality....the nomiation is based on super delegates too beachbum bob Jun 2016 #133
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Steve Kornacki Explains W...»Reply #59