Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: If the FBI has the 30,000 emails that Hillary had deleted from her server, and just ONE [View all]elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)154. the buck stops offshore
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
161 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If the FBI has the 30,000 emails that Hillary had deleted from her server, and just ONE [View all]
rateyes
May 2016
OP
Not only would they be facing charges, there wouldn't be a need to have a year-long
Fawke Em
May 2016
#132
Reading RW smear Hillary stories leaves you in a Bernie Bubble way of thinking-->
riversedge
May 2016
#4
True, but she's under obligation to classify it and notify the U.S. Intelligence Community.
Fawke Em
May 2016
#135
Yup! That's why Mills walked out to confer with legal during the FBI investigation
NWCorona
May 2016
#70
As has been stated it doesn't matter if she knew, which she did. It's still a crime.
onecaliberal
May 2016
#57
Look, they can't prove intent, she's not going to be indicted. Forget that and move on.
Shrike47
May 2016
#13
I don't see you pointing out the "misinformation" and providing correction. nt
grasswire
May 2016
#159
Secs. 793 (e) and (f) are like DUI. You don't have to intend to violate the law
leveymg
May 2016
#61
Answer: Because of ill informed people, passing of CNN soundbites as "news". A certain demographic
insta8er
May 2016
#14
And Bridgegate...oh wait, wrong person...but I'm sure she was somehow involved. nt
eastwestdem
May 2016
#68
No, the question was regarding whether the existence and usage of private email was against the law.
tandem5
May 2016
#47
That's right she had a private email that she used. Unsecured is relative as a number of
tandem5
May 2016
#50
do you not understand the difference between a server and an email provider? nt
grasswire
May 2016
#52
I'm a computer scientist. I understand the concepts involved with this discussion.
tandem5
May 2016
#54
Maybe we differ on our respective interpretations of how she handled sensitive information.
tandem5
May 2016
#82
i thought they already discovered work-related among them? anyone know? sure I read this
amborin
May 2016
#75
We already know that emails were sent to David Petraeus that were not included...
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#77