Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So says Bernie. The campaigns don't write the platform. The committees were named in January. LuvLoogie May 2016 #1
This scscholar May 2016 #10
Do you have a point? You don't address the complaint. DWS rhett o rick May 2016 #14
You mean she stacked them for the person winning? nt nolawarlock May 2016 #49
And this is your way of appealing to the voters that you need for Hillary to win in nov? Jemmons May 2016 #52
I'm not running for president. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #55
Yes. I can see why. nt Jemmons May 2016 #56
Yep. nolawarlock May 2016 #57
Thank you for using the word "Stacked" which impies unfairness and truedelphi May 2016 #77
LOL! nolawarlock May 2016 #83
Makes it even MORE unfair since most states hadn't even had a primary yet in January Triana May 2016 #85
You're begging the question. People are voting for the candidate... LuvLoogie May 2016 #88
The platform... Triana May 2016 #89
According to Kos, this happened in January though. LisaM May 2016 #2
How could they appoint the members of the committees in January when the JDPriestly May 2016 #76
JDPriestly—I will vote in November. (The powerful want us to not vote.) CobaltBlue May 2016 #91
Excellent griffi94 May 2016 #3
Bernie would have so much more clout now if he had run as an indy. You think having him in the Ed Suspicious May 2016 #4
No. If he were Indie griffi94 May 2016 #5
Don't judge until you see his behavior after the last primaries. moriah May 2016 #8
No thanks griffi94 May 2016 #9
Yeah. Kall May 2016 #26
too bad you have a vivid imagination. hollysmom May 2016 #50
What "RW smears"? snot May 2016 #20
Right haha. griffi94 May 2016 #22
She is laundering money through the Hillary Victory Fund. This is well-established fact. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #28
Haha Yeah Okay griffi94 May 2016 #30
You care about a lot less than I do. I care about the ultimate purpose of governance. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #32
Good luck griffi94 May 2016 #33
So Clinton won JimDandy May 2016 #45
Well she won griffi94 May 2016 #46
Thanks for exposing your true self Fairgo May 2016 #27
No idea what you're talking about griffi94 May 2016 #29
Of course Fairgo May 2016 #31
Petty and vindictive, just like your candidate. frylock May 2016 #36
Politics aint beanbag griffi94 May 2016 #37
Is that why Camp Weathervain is all wadded over a few fuck bombs? frylock May 2016 #38
I haven't seen an official position on that. griffi94 May 2016 #39
Let the hate flow through you. frylock May 2016 #40
It's less hate griffi94 May 2016 #42
So, griffi94—is your message to independents: FOAD with Bernie Sanders? CobaltBlue May 2016 #60
Yes griffi94 May 2016 #62
griffi94—Please let the DNC know. During the primaries. And, should Hillary be nominee, the general. CobaltBlue May 2016 #70
Having been a democrat as long as you... Buddyblazon May 2016 #73
This is the internet griffi94 May 2016 #74
Well... Buddyblazon May 2016 #80
How you vote makes no difference to me at all griffi94 May 2016 #81
Sen Sanders is a Democrat. But the Party Elite, funded by rhett o rick May 2016 #15
Bernie doesn't have the support griffi94 May 2016 #19
So you can win the general without the support from people under 45 Jemmons May 2016 #53
I don't think you speak griffi94 May 2016 #64
Well thanks for anecdotal evidence from your real life Jemmons May 2016 #67
Thanks and good luck griffi94 May 2016 #68
I prefer not to rely on luck as it seems to me to be a bit erratic Jemmons May 2016 #69
Oh, griffi! CobaltBlue May 2016 #61
Oh, CobaltBlue griffi94 May 2016 #66
Are you paid by the hour or by the post? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #71
I just do this for fun griffi94 May 2016 #72
that poster seems like a repub trying to make dems hate hc questionseverything May 2016 #78
It's a compromise solution for him to concede if he loses the popular vote... moriah May 2016 #6
Running as a Democrat was a kindness and a mistake mindwalker_i May 2016 #7
"EVERYONE under 30" - only in the bernie-verse is that true. nt msongs May 2016 #11
Clinton / DWS / Goldman-Sachs are corrupting our election process. rhett o rick May 2016 #16
They corrupted it to get one of their own in mindwalker_i May 2016 #34
We get you hate Sanders, but, again, I ask: which Democrats in this millenium have you been FOR? merrily May 2016 #25
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME???? HOLY SHIT! What a bunch of bullshit! ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #93
Um, excuse me? merrily Jun 2016 #94
After that poster's behavior during this primary to find that (s)he talked that much... ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #95
Ok. It looked as though you might have been commenting on my post. Yep. merrily Jun 2016 #97
Very telling. Thanks for the heads up on that, merrily! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #98
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily May 2016 #21
DWS has tipped the whole election process. oldandhappy May 2016 #12
I hate your corrupt party and don't want to be a part of it. ContinentalOp May 2016 #13
It's a wonder Bernie ever catches his plane. LuvLoogie May 2016 #18
He has always caucused with the Democrats, he is more a Democrat than most in the party re issues Dragonfli May 2016 #35
Maybe the best post ever !! pangaia May 2016 #44
Ah! But you just did thank me, not so hard after all! Dragonfli May 2016 #47
Yes, I guess I did. pangaia May 2016 #48
I thank you too! dreamnightwind May 2016 #79
He gave Senate Dems the majority in 2010, too. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #58
Close thread. Where should we mail your winners trophy? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #75
FUCK that noise! He's more of a Democrat than any number of DINOs! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2016 #96
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #17
3 - that is ridiculous! If anything the reps should be proportionate of the % of delegates earned. jillan May 2016 #23
The DNC's response. Beacool May 2016 #24
The DNC will never get another dime from me. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #41
Clinton has worked hard for decades to get her allies into official positions The Second Stone May 2016 #43
K&R silvershadow May 2016 #51
Timcanova.com Funtatlaguy May 2016 #54
Yep, she does have to go Duckhunter935 May 2016 #59
No, they didn't JUST rig anything. Playing the victim is getting old. Sheepshank May 2016 #63
By the time DWS "goes" it won't matter any more Ferd Berfel May 2016 #65
just as planned shanti May 2016 #82
It's going to get worse. progressoid May 2016 #84
The winner will have more influence. NCTraveler May 2016 #86
The losers don't get to dictate the terms. Renew Deal May 2016 #87
That is not very smart political strategy if you actually want to have a viable party Armstead Jun 2016 #92
Another crazy conspiracy theory. RBInMaine May 2016 #90
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How the DNC Just Rigged t...»Reply #25