2016 Postmortem

merrily

(45,251 posts)

53. Tell that to Hillary 2008. Also, counting them is one thing. An OP that

Wed May 4, 2016, 11:49 AM

May 2016

counts them without saying it is counting them is another thing entirely.

It seems to be a game Hillary's DU supporters have been playing for a while now and it's both dishonest and pointless.

No one is fooled.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Delegate count: Clinton 2,202, Sanders 1,455 181 from victory [View all] Gomez163 May 2016 OP

Bull shit...so you work for CNN or MSNBC ... bkkyosemite May 2016 #1

Link Gomez163 May 2016 #3

Bernie math sucks workinclasszero May 2016 #48

Woah! Clinton won an extra 600 delegates in Indiana last night? n/t TCJ70 May 2016 #2

The supers count. Just ask Bernie. He wants their support. Buzz Clik May 2016 #5

They don't count yet. TCJ70 May 2016 #10

How many delegates have voted so far? Buzz Clik May 2016 #12

We're talking about super delegates, right? TCJ70 May 2016 #14

No pledged delegates have voted yet either. nt Cali_Democrat May 2016 #18

That wasn't what we were talking about, but OK. n/t TCJ70 May 2016 #20

No delegates have voted. Not the pledged delegates, not the supers. Buzz Clik May 2016 #24

3,118 delegates have been pledged and cannot change. They are locked in. morningfog May 2016 #25

I am a pledged delegate CoffeeCat May 2016 #55

yada yada yada. How many have voted at the National Dem Convention where the votes count? Buzz Clik May 2016 #58

Pledged delegates are counted as the process moves forward CoffeeCat May 2016 #60

Nope. Buzz Clik May 2016 #61

I realize that you want different rules for your precious Hillary CoffeeCat May 2016 #63

Do you seriously not know how this stuff works? Matariki May 2016 #65

yes, they do. PROOF >>>> KittyWampus May 2016 #28

They are Hillary's! Bought and paid for! Human101948 May 2016 #57

The Superdelegates haven't voted yet (nt) CoffeeCat May 2016 #4

How's that flipping of superdelegates working out for you??? Gomez163 May 2016 #8

Did sanders even get one to flip yet? workinclasszero May 2016 #49

None of the delegates have voted. But, their preferences have been indicated. Buzz Clik May 2016 #9

They have already pledged their vote as THEY ARE ALLOWED TO DO IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY. KittyWampus May 2016 #29

Definitely not a math major casperthegm May 2016 #6

Actually am a math major. Gomez163 May 2016 #11

You should check your numbers. stone space May 2016 #16

Seriously casperthegm May 2016 #23

I've cited two sources already. You just refuse to believe because Gomez163 May 2016 #33

You're funny casperthegm May 2016 #41

SO YOU'RE SAYING THERE'S A CHANCE??????? Gomez163 May 2016 #42

Ever hear of John Paul Jones? casperthegm May 2016 #44

I haven't been following too closely since Iowa, but those numbers look faked to me. stone space May 2016 #7

Awesome. Bernie's only 181 from the win. nm floriduck May 2016 #13

How many Bernie supporters does it take to change a lightbulb???? Gomez163 May 2016 #15

One sparrow? workinclasszero May 2016 #50

After Indiana, not counting Supers.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #17

I count Supers. If you don't you're being delusional. Gomez163 May 2016 #19

Oh, great... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #22

It's stupid to count supers now. THe mantra is they will follow the pledged delegate winner. morningfog May 2016 #30

Your OP makes no mention of supers. As it stands, it is simply a lie. stone space May 2016 #35

I don't buy into the need to distinguish superdelegates. Gomez163 May 2016 #37

Without the word "superdelegates" appearing, your OP is a blatant and knowing lie. (nt) stone space May 2016 #40

It's absurd to not count super delegates because in the Democratic Party they may pledge KittyWampus May 2016 #31

Publishing these numbers in an OP without the word "superdelegates" even appearing is a lie. stone space May 2016 #39

Tell that to Hillary 2008. Also, counting them is one thing. An OP that merrily May 2016 #53

Real Clear Politics has the exact same count Gomez163 May 2016 #21

She is 322 pledged delegates from victory. morningfog May 2016 #26

Unfortunately, the jury has allowed your fake numbers to stand. stone space May 2016 #27

I was on this jury. Cali_Democrat May 2016 #43

Did you vote to let the blatant lie stand? (nt) stone space May 2016 #45

Of course I let the post stand. Cali_Democrat May 2016 #46

That's unfortunate. The numbers are a blatant lie. Sad to see DU supporting knowing lies. (nt) stone space May 2016 #47

Someone called the DU cops.... CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 #32

total bullshit. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #34

CNN to end Bernie's campaign soon dcbuckeye May 2016 #36

Its what happened in 2008. Obama had a way smaller lead. Gomez163 May 2016 #38

I just heard if Bernie gets 70% of CA vote he wins the nomination. Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #51

Wrong Gomez163 May 2016 #54

Allow me to quote Uponthegears May 2016 #52

If Bernie wants to be stubborn and hold his breath then they wait until Gomez163 May 2016 #56

Do you recall Uponthegears May 2016 #59

He's almost winning. She almost needs to drop out now. nt ucrdem May 2016 #62

Here we go - Its mathematically impossible for Sanders to win more pledged delegates. Gomez163 May 2016 #64