Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Delegate count: Clinton 2,202, Sanders 1,455 181 from victory [View all]workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)48. Bernie math sucks
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yada yada yada. How many have voted at the National Dem Convention where the votes count?
Buzz Clik
May 2016
#58
They have already pledged their vote as THEY ARE ALLOWED TO DO IN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY.
KittyWampus
May 2016
#29
I haven't been following too closely since Iowa, but those numbers look faked to me.
stone space
May 2016
#7
It's stupid to count supers now. THe mantra is they will follow the pledged delegate winner.
morningfog
May 2016
#30
Without the word "superdelegates" appearing, your OP is a blatant and knowing lie. (nt)
stone space
May 2016
#40
It's absurd to not count super delegates because in the Democratic Party they may pledge
KittyWampus
May 2016
#31
Publishing these numbers in an OP without the word "superdelegates" even appearing is a lie.
stone space
May 2016
#39
That's unfortunate. The numbers are a blatant lie. Sad to see DU supporting knowing lies. (nt)
stone space
May 2016
#47
Here we go - Its mathematically impossible for Sanders to win more pledged delegates.
Gomez163
May 2016
#64