Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
"It is not just about me, it has never just been about me," salinsky Apr 2016 #1
Exactly. DURHAM D Apr 2016 #4
LOL. OK. think Apr 2016 #5
Clinton cannot agree to his platform, its barred by trade treaty Baobab Apr 2016 #162
Was that "Trade Treaty" approved by 3/4 of the Senate? IF not it is not a treaty. Vincardog Apr 2016 #218
"World Trade Organization" Baobab Apr 2016 #220
Would that be harder or easier to get out of than the Geneva Conventions W abrogated? Vincardog Apr 2016 #222
LOL!....Bernie, the candidate of 'US and WE' versus Hillary, the candidate of 'ME and I'.... Segami Apr 2016 #12
No. Another invention. We're not buying and not debating the pure fabrications. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #17
OK. Since neither side is likely to convince the other.... nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #132
It's not a fabrication Mnpaul Apr 2016 #207
When you have repukes reiterating this dishonesty bs with benghazi hearings wordpix Apr 2016 #209
Yes. And thanks for all your posts Segami. dinkytron Apr 2016 #46
Now that I have read Bernies interview... Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #160
I don't think it started out that way. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #15
Oh please. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #133
You have no clue Armstead Apr 2016 #19
You want to talk about message? ... salinsky Apr 2016 #44
so vote for the one that can get something passed, even 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #67
I donated to other Democratic candidates because Bernie's campaign sent an email asking me to. n/t femmedem Apr 2016 #85
There you go. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #134
I would rather have an outspoken advocate for these issues; bvar22 Apr 2016 #176
Then by all means, please vote for more of the same. It's been so great! Kittycat Apr 2016 #185
The only thing he promised is to try. Scuba Apr 2016 #211
He's doing no such thing. Chan790 Apr 2016 #224
+1 Exactly merrily Apr 2016 #71
Member since: Tue Mar 1, 2016, 04:10 PM = Welcome to Ignore. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #25
For the second time .... salinsky Apr 2016 #38
Lots of passive-aggressive here Dem2 Apr 2016 #53
Hey, cheer up, Dem2 senz Apr 2016 #123
No one expects you to stop Fairgo Apr 2016 #124
My mother taught me to Look Away when someone is making a fool of themselves in public. bvar22 Apr 2016 #177
exactly Fairgo Apr 2016 #181
IT's jsut a juvenile debating tactic anigbrowl Apr 2016 #129
So very different but TM99 Apr 2016 #204
Not really anigbrowl Apr 2016 #208
A swing and a miss ... salinsky Apr 2016 #213
Just because you say you support TM99 Apr 2016 #221
I never said I support Sanders ... salinsky Apr 2016 #223
Well then we were correct? TM99 Apr 2016 #225
Correct about what? salinsky Apr 2016 #227
Who said we were all Democrats? TM99 Apr 2016 #228
Thanks for confirming my suspicions ... salinsky Apr 2016 #229
You act like it is some sort of secret thing. TM99 Apr 2016 #232
So, what're you gonna do? Vote for Trump? salinsky Apr 2016 #233
Why in the fuck would I vote for Trump? TM99 Apr 2016 #234
That would put you firmly in the toilet flushing category ... salinsky Apr 2016 #235
No, kid, it does not. TM99 Apr 2016 #236
Pfffft ... salinsky Apr 2016 #237
Yes, you are TM99 Apr 2016 #238
Dude, I don't care who you vote for ... salinsky Apr 2016 #239
You obviously care way too much TM99 Apr 2016 #240
We just look at your start date and number of posts artislife Apr 2016 #167
Consider the name: "salinsky". A very popular online username among a certain set of voters. ieoeja Apr 2016 #70
timing is everything. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #206
Are you kidding? He didn't want to run for president and waited for a long time to see if Blue Meany Apr 2016 #35
Warren is not running because she has an important agenda that is better served ... salinsky Apr 2016 #49
You have no clue why Warren isn't running. Please stop pretending to read minds. merrily Apr 2016 #73
Warren said that was why she wasn't running. Do you disbelieve her? Squinch Apr 2016 #78
Link, please. merrily Apr 2016 #79
You can look it up. Google "Elizabeth Warren statement not running" Squinch Apr 2016 #83
Um, I did that before I asked for a link. Your turn. merrily Apr 2016 #89
Here are two of the many statements I found that essentially say the same thing. But anyway, Squinch Apr 2016 #96
I would have ended it with the one and only reply I made to the poster, if you had not chimed in. merrily Apr 2016 #98
OK, merrily. Whatever. Squinch Apr 2016 #99
“I’m not running and I’m not going to run,” she said. “I’m in Washington. I’ve got this really ... salinsky Apr 2016 #107
It is phatic. She had to say something. Do you think everyone who asks "How are you doing?" really merrily Apr 2016 #108
Let's review ... salinsky Apr 2016 #110
I stated my position, which is different from yours. That is no different from what you are merrily Apr 2016 #112
"I stated my position, which is different from yours." ... salinsky Apr 2016 #114
And you think this post will help your candidate (I'm assuming HRC) SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #137
+1,000! nt MADem Apr 2016 #42
Brings to mind: OilemFirchen Apr 2016 #77
It never has been just about him. liberalnarb Apr 2016 #86
And Bernie knows what's best for the American people, LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #125
Yass. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #104
Clinton people dont understand this because it does not compute. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #105
+++ frylock Apr 2016 #118
Yup, with that evil Hillary it's all about her annavictorious Apr 2016 #194
Welcome to DU. I trust you've enjoyed your first month? lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #198
#I'mWithHER frylock Apr 2016 #116
By what measure? Another slime if you can't come up with evidence of dishonesty? snowy owl Apr 2016 #117
He's being dishonest about his whole agenda ... salinsky Apr 2016 #121
Well, as things stand presently, SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #138
#Yourewithher shalafi Apr 2016 #119
It has never been about him, and the proof is if he wanted to profit off of Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #152
So Bernie plans to bring down the Democratic party and let the GOP win Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #158
Bring down the Democratic Party? No, that's Debbie's job ... Scuba Apr 2016 #212
Did you forget to add... Matt_R Apr 2016 #231
I just find it hard to believe that Bernie would believe anything Hillary says, at this point. djean111 Apr 2016 #2
Me either, she'll say anything to win. nt haikugal Apr 2016 #8
She would have to do more than adopt specific aspects of his platform to convince me swilton Apr 2016 #37
I don't think he does dana_b Apr 2016 #43
Well, yeah, but SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #139
Oh I agree and dana_b Apr 2016 #171
Well, Bernie stated that he would support Hillary if he only knew what she stood for. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #183
Yeah changing her platform won't help, not when you're known as a liar. Joob Apr 2016 #214
Exactly right eggman67 Apr 2016 #241
He's with us!! haikugal Apr 2016 #3
How profound: He's with Us Vs. I'm with Her FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #26
. haikugal Apr 2016 #31
He's starting to pivot. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #6
No he isn't, he was responding to a question designed to elicit that response. CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #10
Please. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #40
That's a fair point. Big picture, on careful review, I think you're right. MADem Apr 2016 #45
I think he's going to do that for his ... JoePhilly Apr 2016 #51
I think you've nailed it. My first reaction was "WHAT HUBRIS!" but looking through a longer lens MADem Apr 2016 #72
That's an interesting idea!! JoePhilly Apr 2016 #88
Makes sense, simply from an age and effort POV. MADem Apr 2016 #95
You may be right, SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #141
He can be "in it to the Convention" but if she wins on the first ballot, and it's likely that she MADem Apr 2016 #161
Well, I sincerely hope she surprises me, if it comes to that. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #169
It's not her turn. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #188
It's not the "stating" part that concerns me. She's stated plenty. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #193
I'm not concerned with what she said either. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #196
I'm not even thinking about that until it moves forward, if it does. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #199
Right! Losers don't make the demands. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #203
"It's a two-way street", says the guys not conceding anything. CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #7
It is good that you noticed. HubertHeaver Apr 2016 #16
So candidate Carpetbagger is going to play hard to get, eh? The people that voted during the SFnomad Apr 2016 #9
You are too funny. Hope you have a great weekend! think Apr 2016 #13
Before I saw your response, I almost posted the exact same thing you did Armstead Apr 2016 #21
Straight from that Hillary super PAC, well done. Broward Apr 2016 #20
Which policy stances of his don't fit within the Democratic Party? TCJ70 Apr 2016 #23
Third Way or New Deal? nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #142
Well he is a democrat but many people are finding the 'he's no democrat' a plus given their well haikugal Apr 2016 #33
When you said "candidate Carpetbagger" I thought you were referring to the former Senator from NY corkhead Apr 2016 #64
After 7 years you're hardly a carpetbagger anymore. How long has BS been a Democrat? 15-20 mins? n/t SFnomad Apr 2016 #68
Note to independents/third parties: don't caucus with Dems. Sounds like a winning strategy! n/t That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #93
Secretary Clinton has had a house in NY for 16 years now ... she has ties to NY SFnomad Apr 2016 #103
She did not have a house in NY before she decided to run for the Senate. That Guy 888 Apr 2016 #106
I'm glad there was a transcript BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #11
You mean Andrea Micthell -- her name isn't "Mrs. Greenspan": obamanut2012 Apr 2016 #29
She IS Ms. Greenspan.... haikugal Apr 2016 #34
No. It is Mrs. Alan Greenspan. Her husband was a key perpetrator of the Great Recession FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #36
Isn't it misogynist to imply that a woman can't think differently than her husband? Dem2 Apr 2016 #113
One can, but SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #143
Guilt by association Dem2 Apr 2016 #144
Well, I wouldn't marry someone SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #147
Mr. Andrea Greenspan Dem2 Apr 2016 #149
If you say so. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #153
You're simply justifying your political biases Dem2 Apr 2016 #155
If that's the way you see it, please carry on. Without me. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #156
Oh, and if you're going with my analogy, it would be Mr. Andrea Mitchell. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #154
Not only is she clueless, but she's offensive. Gregorian Apr 2016 #14
If he's already outlining the endorsement, then the primary is over Tarc Apr 2016 #18
That's right doesn't want or need Hillarys support Skink Apr 2016 #24
Sorry that you're having a hard time facing reality Tarc Apr 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author itsrobert Apr 2016 #22
I'm in the Tired of Unimaginative Parrots stage of grief Armstead Apr 2016 #27
LOL--He's saying "It's not about ME, but if you don't do what I WANT, I'm going to take all my MADem Apr 2016 #28
more threats dana_b Apr 2016 #47
You don't think he was making threats himself? Still the same old I'm-not-a-Dem gadfly... Hekate Apr 2016 #87
Threats? The one doing the "threatening" is Sanders. MADem Apr 2016 #90
OK then Pat Riots Apr 2016 #140
Thanks. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #148
I don't dispute that the Dems made a deal with him--they even put him on their ballot. MADem Apr 2016 #172
If you want my support you have to earn it. Sounds very reasonable to me. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #30
Most if not all of his goals are worthy DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #32
Why have they been criticized so much then? Armstead Apr 2016 #54
Really. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #145
Too bad. I was hoping he wouldn't go full tilt into the role of an angry and bitter old codger. procon Apr 2016 #39
more ageism dana_b Apr 2016 #48
Yeah, but it was alerted and allowed to stand. Punkingal Apr 2016 #56
I'm 70+, what is this 'agism' thou speaketh of? procon Apr 2016 #58
I'm no spring chicken so I do know that dana_b Apr 2016 #61
Sanders is just under six years older than Hillary. merrily Apr 2016 #75
Yeah, I bet you were hoping. I bet you might even vote for Bernie if it weren't for his supporters corkhead Apr 2016 #52
True. Very true. nt. procon Apr 2016 #59
LOL! Just under 6 years older than Hillary. merrily Apr 2016 #57
Terrible way to characterize this great American. Shame on you. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #62
You do know that Hill is almost as old as he is don't you? peace13 Apr 2016 #63
Stick with bitter and codger then. procon Apr 2016 #135
Sounds delicious. peace13 Apr 2016 #146
"evidently didn't interest enough voters to put him over the top" SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #151
Oh, my goodness, listen to you. procon Apr 2016 #184
Please. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #191
... "necessary for the country" ??? procon Apr 2016 #195
Working a lot better than you anticipated, I bet. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #197
lol,how about your old war horse screaming non stop? I like how her eye twitches when she's angry wendylaroux Apr 2016 #66
May I remind you that Hillary is ONLY 5 years younger than Bernie and Bernie is in better health. jillan Apr 2016 #101
She has angry old woman thing going, but we are not supposed to say it. artislife Apr 2016 #170
ageism is just as despicable as sexism. desmiller Apr 2016 #182
Try that message with the Superdelegates you need and let us know how it works out brooklynite Apr 2016 #50
Good I have been waiting for the this kind of statement. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #55
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #60
Give 'em hell, Bernie! closeupready Apr 2016 #65
Absolutely Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #163
When you lose it's a one-way street, and you ain't driving BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #69
A wise woman named Peggysue says, "The hitchhiker is demanding the car keys." Squinch Apr 2016 #82
Clinton is not stupid. If she becomes the nominee, you will see incorporation JimDandy Apr 2016 #131
Yeah, but what I'm worried about is a pivot *after* the GE..... nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #159
So tired of those myself, even when prepared for them. That's why I don't think I will even have it JimDandy Apr 2016 #164
Oh I (reluctantly) do. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #174
Who trusts HIllary to follow through on a promise? bvar22 Apr 2016 #200
This is pretty disappointing. He wants to run on the Democratic ticket, but Arkansas Granny Apr 2016 #74
How can anyone know her platform, sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #91
Correct. shalafi Apr 2016 #115
Her platforms have literally changed during the election Joob Apr 2016 #92
If I were Clinton Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #166
Any candidate who is for war and fracking and the TPP and means-testing Social Security djean111 Apr 2016 #205
YES! merrily Apr 2016 #76
If even 1% of Bernie's Ideals make it into a Clinton Platform it will probably have been worth The_Casual_Observer Apr 2016 #80
That's already happened. Clinton became his doppelganger months ago and has already appropriating JimDandy Apr 2016 #130
Wait? northernsouthern Apr 2016 #81
This was the best I apcalc Apr 2016 #84
She would have to demonstrate NOW that she is serious about election integrity. lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #97
"I 've got to find out what her platform is" Who the hell supports such ignorance? WOW. bettyellen Apr 2016 #100
That was a great side swipe by Sanders at the Weathervaner's weekly changes in policy. JimDandy Apr 2016 #127
Oh my, I think you're right! Great side swipe! SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #168
Well stated Bernie! pa28 Apr 2016 #102
Meh. Bernie will endorse Hillary. He's not going to end his career by helping Trump get elected. Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #109
That kind of vacuousness is not a trait of Sanders. n/t JimDandy Apr 2016 #128
I have no problem with Sanders staying in the race until all votes are cast, Beacool Apr 2016 #111
Polls show him consistently defeating Republicans by a much greater margin senz Apr 2016 #122
It's a moot point. She will be the nominee. Beacool Apr 2016 #173
You mean the will of the Party elite? senz Apr 2016 #175
Reality is something that you're not familiar with, right? Beacool Apr 2016 #178
The Hillary Group keeps floating this completely meaningless statistic bvar22 Apr 2016 #187
National GE polls this far out don't count either. nt Nonhlanhla Apr 2016 #226
I'm familiar with the reality of Hill's deck stacking, game rigging and string pulling. senz Apr 2016 #189
This post more than others has evoked the absence of integrity in Clinton supporters. snowy owl Apr 2016 #120
Nope... Buddyblazon Apr 2016 #126
She'd have to change her (political) DNA to earn my support. IOW, it's not possible for her. nt Romulox Apr 2016 #136
Hillary Clinton has proven herself to be not only a liar and a cheat, but incompetent to boot. AzDar Apr 2016 #150
This... deathrind Apr 2016 #157
Well, it keeps changing.... or "evolving" or something... bvar22 Apr 2016 #179
I think you... deathrind Apr 2016 #192
Yes!! The campaigns have shown themselves to be very far apart. artislife Apr 2016 #165
It's not just about me. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #190
Clintons platform is the win and what is getting the votes. So, Sanders renigs. Insists, demands seabeyond Apr 2016 #180
Then she will have to do it without the Bern. This sounds like a threat and not good to supers. nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #186
She sure does. If he doesn't win, he needs to move her as far to the left as he can silvershadow Apr 2016 #201
There is a limit to any demands Sanders makes of Clinton. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #202
Realistically, it is pretty much pointless to make any liberal or Progressive demands of Hillary, djean111 Apr 2016 #215
If Sanders makes those type of accusations like you are then LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #216
Brockwurst. djean111 Apr 2016 #217
If he askes his supporters to support Clinton, he will become-- eridani Apr 2016 #210
But is Clinton able to change at all? Orsino Apr 2016 #219
Its Unfortunate but Wake Up HRC supporters jimmy_crack_corn Apr 2016 #230
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders Returns: "It...»Reply #42