Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

onenote

(42,602 posts)

26. His testimony was given in 1991. It related to his opinion

Reply to leftynyc (Reply #21)

Thu Oct 25, 2012, 11:41 PM

Oct 2012

given in 1991 as to what the value of the stock was in 1987. In other words, he didn't testify about the stock's value before she got the stock or before she sold it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New details about Allred bombshell, Romney lied so divorcee would get almost nothing in settlement. [View all] imgbitepolitic Oct 2012 OP

Mitt The Shit oswaldactedalone Oct 2012 #1

Read on twitter.. BraKez2 Oct 2012 #2

If the court records were destroyed, then why are people headed to court to unseal them? GreenPartyVoter Oct 2012 #3

The parties (the ex wife) may still have the transcripts. Lex Oct 2012 #4

I want this to be true! texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #5

His ex wife had MS and multiple bouts of cancer, she was NOT some "lazy ex husband." progressivebydesign Oct 2012 #7

so the staples guy is a jerk texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #8

He lied during the divorce proceedings leftynyc Oct 2012 #10

she would have made 7.5 million texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #12

He claims he was leftynyc Oct 2012 #16

perjury texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #20

If the time between leftynyc Oct 2012 #21

not a few weeks texasmomof3 Oct 2012 #23

His testimony was given in 1991. It related to his opinion onenote Oct 2012 #26

So, both Maureen and Ann got MS. Ann got medical care and dressage; Maureen got the shaft. factsarenotfair Oct 2012 #19

From the link courseofhistory Oct 2012 #6

His response will be NewJeffCT Oct 2012 #13

Its on cnn.com imgbitepolitic Oct 2012 #9

and its on yahoo imgbitepolitic Oct 2012 #11

It hard to prove he lied. DCBob Oct 2012 #14

cnn imgbitepolitic Oct 2012 #15

Rmoney may not suffer legal consequences for his perjury meow2u3 Oct 2012 #17

+1 ProudProgressiveNow Oct 2012 #22

Just another instance of how Mitt really feels about women. nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #18

Revenge is a dish best served cold. She has waited for years to spring this one McCamy Taylor Oct 2012 #24

Having skimmed the actual testimony, onenote Oct 2012 #25