2016 Postmortem

delrem

(9,688 posts)

12. So David Brock's PAC counted it out. That's impressive.

Tue Apr 19, 2016, 03:08 AM

Apr 2016

You guys, I mean you, dispersing David Brock's PAC talking points, are very impressive.

You're like an energy bunny transformed into a roomba, set on its way by citizens united to do the work of idiots.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

27 TIMES: BERNIE SANDERS OR CAMPAIGN SAID THEY WOULD, COULD, OR MUST WIN NEW YORK PRIMARY [View all] Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 OP

And your point is?????????????????? KPN Apr 2016 #1

i'm confused too Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #3

Apparently we can add English to the list with math Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #16

math. Hillary is now LESS than 8% ahead in pledged delegates Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #18

math. There is now a 14% spread between Hillary and Sanders in delegate targets for the nom Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #22

are they including super delegates? please show the equation they used Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #35

Go to the link and do your own homework. Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #38

i did. i even showed the math in my post. where did you get the 14% you posted? Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #39

Hillary is +7% of her delegate target, Sanders is -7% of his target. The spread is then 14%. Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #40

i am not talking about targets. i am talking about actual real delegate counts. Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #42

You were responding to a post about delegate targets. Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #43

Nice work jcgoldie Apr 2016 #23

I don't even think the author had a point. A lot of wasted effort and words if you ask me. nt Live and Learn Apr 2016 #5

Correcting The Record of course Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #33

The point is meaningless shit stirring Armstead Apr 2016 #41

And? jmg257 Apr 2016 #2

What is the relevance of this post? Impedimentus Apr 2016 #4

This OP reminds me Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #6

At least I understand the relevance of month old bananas. No so with the OP. Impedimentus Apr 2016 #8

bananas shouldn't be refrigerated Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #34

Math, English Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #50

And ??? SamKnause Apr 2016 #7

YES, he NEEDS to win New York. NO, he won't win New York. That's why... Corporate666 Apr 2016 #9

At least catch up if you're presuming to be spouting "facts." JudyM Apr 2016 #19

Pay no mind to phantom DUer's. nt Snotcicles Apr 2016 #27

Catch up with what? Corporate666 Apr 2016 #52

Oh, my. So you think we all should just quit if he doesn't win NY? That IS what you are implying, djean111 Apr 2016 #10

So he DOESN'T need to win NY today? Corporate666 Apr 2016 #11

He needs to win NY, or come very close. delrem Apr 2016 #13

So David Brock's PAC counted it out. That's impressive. delrem Apr 2016 #12

since hc can not raise money from regular people she has to use brock the (insert evil name) questionseverything Apr 2016 #29

Is there something magic about 27? robbedvoter Apr 2016 #14

Well, its digits add up to 9 Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #15

$27 donations. NuclearDem Apr 2016 #26

Nice job they've done of expressing how important it is for Bernie's supporters... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #17

Nice job they've done of illustrating that a loss today will place the nomination out of reach Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #20

Why should I put any stock in 538? If I recall, Silver was wrong on Sanders' viability... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #21

You don't have to put any stock in gravity if you don't want to either Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #25

27 TIMES: LOSING TEAM'S PLAYERS GET CALLED OUT IN A BASEBALL GAME jmg257 Apr 2016 #24

27 times, Hillary said she'd release her speech transcripts. floriduck Apr 2016 #28

I posted evidence, you posted fantasy and blather Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #37

No, your OP cited David Brock's crap site. floriduck Apr 2016 #44

No, I posted direct quotes. You failed to do the same. Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #46

I'm not trivializing mental illness. floriduck Apr 2016 #48

So now you show yourself to be disingenuous as well as insensitive. Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #49

We don't need to win NY griffi94 Apr 2016 #30

He has to win closed primary states. apnu Apr 2016 #31

I think the relevant point here is firebrand80 Apr 2016 #32

I don't care what he says. MoonRiver Apr 2016 #36

The most inane threads are like zombies, they refuse to die. Impedimentus Apr 2016 #45

So what???? Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #47

New York is a must win for Sanders and he has to win by a large margin Gothmog Apr 2016 #51