Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: The Benghazi email story could prove to be devastating. [View all]chillfactor
(7,573 posts)20. guess I missed the "devastating" part....
mixed messages have been coming out of Libya since the attack....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Turn off Faux. Myths that the President didn't refer to the attack as a "terrorist" one immediately
mzmolly
Oct 2012
#3
Yes, the words Benghazi and emails are being reported on. But only one outlet is spinning.
mzmolly
Oct 2012
#12
Emails detail unfolding Benghazi attack on Sept. 11 October 23, 2012 Ambassador Chris Stevens (CBS
JRLeft
Oct 2012
#7
I don't really see the devastation. The WH has said all along there were mixed signals.
SweetieD
Oct 2012
#11
Also see this article from 9/12, the WH specifically mentioned that the group Ansar al Sharia
SweetieD
Oct 2012
#15
Many things "could" happen. Rick Santorum could show up naked on my doorstep tweaking on meth.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2012
#30
It annoys me when these panic threads aren't accompanied with links and research
octoberlib
Oct 2012
#33
I just saw this on my MSNBC feed, wondered what was going on glad I came here
demgrrrll
Oct 2012
#38
You vastly overstate the impact. It will be negligible. And won't "lead for the next 2 weeks."
morningfog
Oct 2012
#46
Benghazi is the ONLY topic on RW radio today...listened to two shows off and on for a bit. For the
wiggs
Oct 2012
#63
I HAVE YET TO HEAR WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION SAID THAT IS NOT ACCURATE. If journalists,
wiggs
Oct 2012
#65